CNAB – Congress of North American Bosniaks
Estimated at 350,000 in North America the number of this Muslim sect is not great, but “a little leaven leavens the whole lump” (Gal 5:9). The Bosniaks referred to are members of a people descended from Slavs in Bosnia who converted to Islam during the period of Ottoman rule. They would best undergo a further name change to Maniacs which are defined as ‘psychotic or otherwise mentally ill persons who exhibits violent or bizarre behavior’. All true followers of Islam exhibit such behavior. It is fact, the truly faithful to the Islamic faith Bosniaks embrace spreads poison in their midst and seeps its’ sewage throughout the rest. This blackened puss must be drained from North America, the wounds cauterized and then healed through their surrender to the lordship of Jesus Christ.
A general statement from their web site: “The Congress of North American Bosniaks (CNAB) is a National Umbrella Organization, representing at least 350,000 Americans and Canadians of Bosniaks descent and origin. Its membership is comprised of fraternal, educational, veteran, religious, cultural, social, business, political organizations and individual members. The Bosniak American – Canadian community prides itself on its deeply rooted commitment to the values of family, faith, democracy, hard work and fulfillment of the American and Canadian dreams. We are present in every state and virtually every community in America and Canada on various social, business and economic levels.”
Exhibiting a split spiritual personality because of their ‘deeply rooted commitment to the value of their faith’ they attempt to inaugurate and perpetuate practices in our society that can only turn the ‘American and Canadian dreams’ into a living nightmare. “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” (Amos 3:3) The Bosniak American/Canadian community states it prides itself on deeply rooted commitment to the values of family. If this is true they are not Canadian values for we do not believe in ‘honor killing’ of our family members as espoused and practiced by Islam. What are the true values of Islam in such a matter that are common with Canadian values? Do we believe in raising our children to be suicide bombers and that they are blessed by God for doing such horrendous acts? Canadians do not, but followers of Muhammad do. The evidence of male children used as jihad soldiers and suicide bombers is indisputable and we are seeing an increasing frequency of females being used in such manner as well. Girls as young as 10 years of age are being used in such fashion. This poses no problem to the Muslim faith that also employs girls of such an age as brides and sex slaves. The Qur’an and Hadith demand growing up of children to be utilized in such fashion when necessary to glorify their Allah. http://www.news.com.au/world/africa/militants-force-a-girl-10-to-become-a-suicide-bomber-in-sickening-market-attack-in-nigeria/story-fnh81gzi-1227181138127
The parents were raised as such children themselves and they are also prepared to kill their own children for not following the true tenants of Islam. This has been designated ‘honor killing’ and truly has nothing to do with ‘common Canadian goals’ that we should be embracing in any fashion domestically or looking to partner with in some fashion ‘internationally’. Given the evidence, ‘common sense’ clearly states that the only ‘common goals’ the Muslim community truly embraces is for your ultimate submission to following its faith.
I now quote from an article by Debbie Schlussel which hits Canada’s malaise surrounding ‘honor killing’ squarely on the head. We are the ones that let the killers in. It would do you good to read the entire article about three guilty Canadian honor killers. “Alia Hogben, executive director of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, believes “the system” failed the three because they were treated as “exotic minorities” rather than “ordinary” Canadians. “Exotic,” indeed. Um, sorry, but as much as Muslims–and their apologists like Wall Street Journal “reporter” Alistair MacDonald–would like to think of themselves as extraordinary and better than all of us, they are as “exotic” as “exotic dancers” and the poles around which they gyrate (with apologies to both the strippers and the herpes-infested pole for the degrading comparison). And even more phony: Ditto for Wall Street Journal apologist MacDonald’s pretense at reporting.
Canada lets these Muslims in. And so do we. Why, then, are we surprised that these honor killings go on? It’s obvious which religion brings this murderous practice to our shores. And it ain’t Buddhism. The problem in this case and so many others like it is not “immigrants,” it is MUSLIM immigrants. And, frankly, just plain Islam, native or foreign-born.”
Yes, Islam is the problem along with Canada’s religious community continuing a stance of not calling it for exactly what it is. Islam is evil as it brings up killers from one generation to the next as required of its true followers.
However, to end all debate surrounding the matter of ‘honor killing’ and its being sanctioned fully by Islam I am attaching one of the best and most complete coverage of the topic I have found. It is written in a manner that is superb in its format and easy to understand while giving all references in Qur’an and Hadith to prove the claims stated about Islam.
From the Introduction: “Honor Killing is the shocking cruelty committed by Muslim family members. The perpetrators in every case are the family members. Honor Killing is a family collaboration. And the victims who are killed are either the daughter or sister or other blood related young women. The crime is usually carried out by the father, brothers or uncles of the victims. However, mothers too have participated in Honor Killing. The victims are killed or slaughtered in a cold-blooded manner. These barbaric killings are executed for the single purpose of saving the honor of the family. Honor Killing is a manifestation of a global phenomenon among Muslims. The purpose of this article is to expose the myth that Honor Killing is not Islamic but a cultural practice. It will be proven conclusively that Honor Killing is not only Islamic but it is also based on the teachings of the Qur’an. In fact, it will be proven, step by step, how the Qur’an nurtures and grooms the Muslim mind to murder in the name of Honor. But more importantly, the purpose of this article is to alert those who are ignorant of Islam. Many are unaware that Islam is a cult of death. It is a blood-thirsty religion. It lives and grows by shedding blood. Islam teaches that by spilling blood as a sacred duty, Muslims can reap personal rewards. Please read this article carefully. Share it with those you know. Use it to educate your family and friends about Islam. Perhaps you may save a life. Silence in the face of evil is evil itself.” ISLAM SANCTIONS HONOR KILLING IN THE QUR’AN | STEALTH TEAM MEGIDDO
The Bosniaks who state that Islam does not call for ‘honor killing’ are simply demon infested liars. Further, when they claim to be the friends of the Jews as does ‘The Bosniak and Jewish Solidarity’ organization they expose themselves even further.
“The Bosniak and Jewish Solidarity is an NGO that promotes friendship between Jewish and Bosniak people. Jews and Bosnian Muslims have a common historical bond, they both suffered genocide at the hands of Serbian Nazi collaborators in the World War II. In the Bosnian war, Bosniak people suffered the first genocide in Europe since the Holocaust. We advocate peace and we stand against the denial of the Holocaust and the Bosnian Genocide.” Only a fool would claim that the Holocaust and Bosnian Genocide did not take place. But, only a bigger fool would claim that Islam advocates peace with all religions and that Islam condones friendship between its followers and Jews. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a fool sufficient proportion to deny the Holocaust, but certainly never a hypocrite to Islam by claiming the Muslims were to be friends of the Jews. He openly stated he wanted the Jews wiped from the face of the earth.
For the Jew or Christian, Islam means war, persecution and death and the Qur’an states to “fight and slay the pagans [Christians] wherever ye find them and seize them, confine them, and lie in wait for them in every place of ambush” (Surah 9:5) Islam is the same now as during the years Mohammad first turned to raiding caravans and attacking all who opposed him. At that time the Jews of the Arabian Peninsula saw Mohammed exactly for what he was, a demon possessed false prophet, and the Jewish-Muslim relations throughout his career were extremely hostile. The Jews tried to avoid Islamic domination but many of them like at An-Nadir and Medina were driven from their lands. Other suffered martyrdom such as over six hundred men at Banu Quraizah. All such activity was fully sanctioned by Muhammad and the Qur’an where many negative things are spoken about the Jews. They are called illogical, vile hard-hearted hypocrites that twisted their scriptures and murdered their prophets. They are warned of Hell fire if they reject Mohammed and the Qur’an, and for certain the Muslims have never been called to be friends of the Jews.
Read what Surah Al-Imran has to say about those who take Christians and Jews as friends. Read how the Jews are described by the Muslim Allah and how they are to be viewed by his followers of deception. Surah Al-Imran 51- 60 “O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust). “Say O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture: “Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allah: those Jews who incurred the Curse of Allah and His Wrath, those of whom He transformed into monkeys and swine, those who worshipped Taghut (false deities); such are worse in rank on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell-fire, and far more astray from the Right Path in the life of this world.” So, if a Muslim is a friend to the Christian or Jew he is ‘one of us’. I guess he would be better off as a Christian though for it is Jews that Allah transformed into monkeys and swine. Perhaps our friendly Bosniaks are really Jews in disguise and simply cannot reconcile themselves whether they prefer bananas or slop. I vote they are swine from the amount of ‘swill’ that comes out of their mouths. Whatever, they are at very best hypocrites to the book of hypocrisy they claim to believe if they state they are friends of the Jews!
What follows is the summary statement and a link to the Surah and Hadith that pertain explicitly to the befriending of Christians and Jews where “unbelievers are described by Muhammad (in the Qur’an) as ‘the vilest of animals’ and ‘losers.’ Christians and Jews are hated by Allah to the extent that they are destined for eternal doom as a result of their beliefs. It would make no sense for Muhammad to then recommend them to be taken in as friends by Muslims. In fact, the Qur’an plainly commands believers not to take unbelievers as friends.”
TheReligionofPeace – Islam: Befriending Christians and Jews
These people need a serious wake-up call for neither the country nor the color of the man it comes out of changes the stench, as all hypocrisy smells the same in the nostrils of God! Stoke up the flames for our Bosniaks are headed for the lake of fire as hypocrites of Islam or being cast there by the Lord Jesus Christ as God denying liars! You cannot hide from the truth Bosniaks and the day of your exposure is fully here! “For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.” (Luke 12:2-3) Why carry on doing your verbal hypocritical tap dance of the devil when you could know absolute freedom through admitting that Islam is based upon darkness, deceit and death to all that oppose it? Not to do so is to lie and to lie is a sin, but “if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” (1 John 1:9) Simply admit you are a sinner and ask Jesus Christ to be the Lord of your life. God will instantly bind you to Him in a personal relationship based on love and freedom from all fear of having to please Him through submission demanding the death of your family members. I must warn you that not to do so entails eternal separation from the God that created you and I am called to personally address this appeal for redemption to the Bosniak leadership listed following. I must also tell all others: “Do they not err that devise evil? but mercy and truth shall be to them that devise good. Cease, my son, to hear the instruction that causes to err from the words of knowledge. An ungodly witness scorns judgment: and the mouth of the wicked devours iniquity. Judgments are prepared for scorners, and stripes for the back of fools.” (Proverbs 14:22; 19:27-29) Come out from the midst of the foolish ones for as spoken to the Jew is now spoken to you: “O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths. The LORD stands up to plead, and stands to judge the people.” (Isaiah 3:12-13) Acknowledge sin and accept Jesus Christ for there is no need for your fear of judgment by a God that loves you.
You here listed are being called to repentance to lead your people to freedom and not damnation: (Prof. Emir Ramic, President, C NAB, Canadian Branch and Chairman, Institute for Genocide Research Canada http://www.instituteforgenocide.ca) (Imam Sabahudin Ćeman, firstname.lastname@example.org) (S.S. Schwartz , Center for Islamic Pluralism email@example.com) (Haris Alibasic, MPA, President, CNAB) (Hamdija Custovic, Spokesman, CNAB http://www.bosniak.org) (Sanja Drnovsek, Director, Bosnian-American Genocide Institute and Education Center http://www.Instituteforgenocide.org)
We start toward closing by looking at a group of people within our Canadian government that must in some manner believe the lie that Muslims are friends of Jews. ‘The Friends of Bosnia and Herzegovina Group’ in the Canadian Parliament is such and supposedly comprised of 26 members under the following leadership.
Chair: Mr. Dave Mackenzie, Conservative MP, firstname.lastname@example.org
Vice Chair: Mr. Brian Masse, NDP MP, email@example.com
Vice Chair: Mr. Bernard Trottier, Conservative MP, Bernard.Trottier@parl.gc.ca
Executive Member, (Treasurer) Mrs. Nina Grewal, CMP, firstname.lastname@example.org
Executive Member: Sen. Raynell Andreychuk, email@example.com
This is ‘Group’ policy as extracted from their web: “Strong relations between our motherland and Canada is our priority, and the process of lobbying for the interests of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Canadian cultural mosaic must continue. The special assembly on Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Canadian Parliament will provide support to the Canadian Parliament with the necessary political and economic reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina, to improve cooperation between the two states. With this new establishment there is an aim to also improve cooperation between the two parliaments, and the present the values of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Canadian society.”
The Group currently has 26 members and there is nothing humorous about the evil intent at the core of the Bosniak-Maniacs. So, listen up ‘groupies’ for what you support determines personal eternal results for you….you cannot support people who are agents of the devil in his activities and escape unscathed. It is stated that ‘special credit’ for the formation of the Group must be given to MP Nina Grewal. Did Grewal ensure her parliamentary associates were aware the Quran’s ‘Law of Equality’ assigns human value and rights based on gender, religion and status? This is the polar opposite of equality in the sense intended by Canadian political-social tradition which makes no such distinction. The Qur’an devaluation of non-Muslims is so foul that it teaches that while a Muslim may be punished with death for murdering a fellow Muslim (Bukhari 83:17), no Muslim can be put to death for killing a non-Muslim (Bukhari 83:50, 3:111 . Muhammad flatly stated: “No Muslim can be killed for killing a kafir”. Grewal and Group leadership you are what the Qur’an defines as a kafir, so it is time to clear your heads and start to right the wrong you perpetuate within the Canadian Parliamentary system. I am going to let the words of Bill Walker aptly tell you how the Muslim truly views you ‘kafir groupies’.
“The Koran defines kafirs. The word “unbeliever” does not remotely carry the meaning of kafir. A kafir is less than human. The word “kafir” is the worst word in the human language. Kafirs can be hated, assassinated, deceived, enslaved, robbed, plotted against, raped, tortured, mocked and demeaned in every way.
Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive the kafir in order to advance Islam. Deceiving kafirs is Sunna, in the way of Mohammed, the perfect Muslim. A Muslim is to tell the truth to another brother Muslim, but, if it will advance Islam, they can deceive the kafir. Does this mean that a Muslim deceives kafirs all the time? Of course not, but if it advances Islam, deception is ethical. Mohammed said: war is deception. Who is the war with? Kafirs are the only enemy of Islam. Mohammed was at a state of permanent war with them. During the last 9 years of his life, he launched and led a violent event on the average of every 6 weeks. He employed deception against the kafirs again and again. Deception is Sunna.
Jihad against the kafir is Sunna. Jihad is also successful. In brief: Mohammed preached the religion of Islam for 13 years in Mecca. He was driven out of Mecca and went to Medina. In Medina he became a politician and a warrior. Islam then grew from a religion to a political force, and Mohammed died without an enemy left standing. Jihad brought him total success. Jihad can be any action or word that brings pressure against the kafir. Jihad is by the sword, pen, speech and money. A jihadist does not have to kill kafirs. This means that deception-jihad, can be practiced in many areas to advance Islam. For instance, a Muslim translator or FBI agent can “shade” their work to conceal facts from the kafirs.”
To sum up Groupies, the message of the Qur’an is a blatant statement of arrogance and personal superiority that in today’s world is manifesting a pattern of violent, aggressive disregard for human suffering that our government claims to want to eradicate. In its supremacist ideology Islam totally subordinates the role of non-believers to that of Muslims, and all who resist them are to be fought until they are either killed, convert to Islam or surrender by paying a poll-tax subjugating their own religion. When circumstance places them in control the Qur’an demand for ‘Muslim dominance’ displays their oppression and discrimination of all non-Muslims. But, when comprising a minority in a society they are distinguished through variant degrees of petulant whining demands, discord and ultimately armed rebellion.
The general indifference of the broader Muslim community toward condemning and dehumanizing those who merely choose not to follow their dogma is what is demanded of them by the Qur’an. It is not a lack of adapting into the larger societal values, or applying more social programing, they simply cannot adapt and be Muslim as the surah dictate. Apologists are correct when stating that Islam has surah about love and kindness, but they fail to disclose the Qur’an only applies this to those within the Muslim community. The Qur’an truly qualifies as a message of ‘hate speech’ for the text mandates the superiority of Islam, and it gives the means of establishing this superiority through violent force based on loathing and disregard of others. The Quran meets every criterion by which we define hate speech with its message based on such loathing and disregard for others. Mohammad started this mess and set in motion the pattern of aggressive military campaigns that we see manifested by ISIS and the other jihad groups loosed upon the world stage now. How can the Canadian government permit and cooperate with any Group to remain lodged within it whose core values are those of Islam? Groupies, the ‘chickens you hatched are coming home to roost’ and lay even fouler eggs in our midst! They are truly vultures in chicken feathers and not the birds you may think have flown into your coop!
Genuine loyalty to Canada and its values simply is not possible for adherents to the Qur’an. Surah and hadith are in the link following, but more importantly read the statements by top Islamic leaders that state this fact I just uttered. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/014-loyalty-to-non-muslim-government.htm
Now, to sort out the chickens that should be allowed to strut around the Canadian barnyard is not an impossible task, and truly it is one that must be addressed in timely fashion by our government. In our ‘ball game’ of Canadian national security I will give you three examples why all Muslims have struck out and should be returned to the ‘dugouts’ they straggled in from.
One: Muslims are not to show honor or loyalty to Canada by standing for our national anthem. But, if unable to avoid this they are commanded to act in a duplicitous manner as Fatwas # 85728 and others indicate. “So, it is unlawful to stand up for such a thing and Muslims should make sure that anything they do conforms with these rules. Blind imitation of disbelievers is rejected. It is reported from Abu Dawood that the Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) said: “Whoever imitates some people, he is one of them” . So, the Muslim should not commit this Haram unless there is dire necessity like fearing to be jailed or beaten. In this case, he may make believe that he is standing for the anthem but keeps on remembering Allah and should feel deep sorrow for doing such a thing. Indeed standing for these flags and anthems is a glorification of them. And if the person intends by such act any glorification of these things similar to glorifying Allah, then he becomes a Kafir, i.e. moves away from Islamic religion. Allah knows best.”
Two: Muslims are not to obtain citizenship of a non-Muslim country, nor to make a pledge of allegiance without dire necessity. Fatwas # 202420 is but one stating this, and again we see the command to act in a fraudulent manner so they can achieve their ends. “We have explained in them that in case of dire necessity, a Muslim who gives the pledge of allegiance to one of these governments may conceal his intention and use Tawriyah (i.e. saying something which has more than one meaning and intending a meaning different from what the listener is likely to understand), like to intend his allegiance only to the Muslims in those lands and to benefit that country by guiding its people to enter Islam. However, the Muslim does not become a disbeliever by merely repeating these words which contain allegiance to the people of Kufr, as long as his heart remains at rest with faith.”
Three: As a general rule the Muslim is forbidden to live among us because it has many negative effects on the practice of Islam. As Fatwas # 82552 states “Living in a non-Muslim country or migration to it is permissible only if a person cannot find a Muslim country where he can earn a livelihood and can practice his religion freely. It is also permissible for Muslim scholars to live in non-Muslim countries for the purpose of Da’wah i.e., calling non-Muslims to Islam and teaching Muslims Sharee’ah rules, provided they can do so freely and would not be subjected to trials or would have to compromise or leave their religion.
All the above mentioned details are related to the rule of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries. But the rule for applying and accepting citizenship of those countries is much restricted. A Muslim is not permitted to apply for citizenship of non-Muslim countries except in a dire need, such as not being able to practice his religion in his own country or fear of oppression or being in danger for his life or the threat of imprisonment or torture in his homeland and there is no Islamic country where he can live. In such circumstances one can apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country. If he is obliged to take an oath for getting citizenship, at that moment one should try to allude to the words of oath as much as possible to escape their intended point.
However, if he is able to live harmlessly in the non-Muslim country without taking the citizenship then applying for citizenship is not permissible for him. It is forbidden for him to apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country if he is simply aspiring to material comforts or financial gain.”
It is quite clear that the Citizenship Oath or Oath of Allegiance is something the Muslim is to try to avoid, and if participating they are to do so from a fraudulent mindset. This is why you hear the Muslim whine about the matter of not wearing the niqab in ‘legal circumstances’. It is also the reason behind the issues surrounding Obama’s swearing in ceremony as President. So what is the worth of an oath of any kind from someone who practices deception because his ‘religion tells him to do so when it advances his agenda? Zero! Muslims owe their alliance to the umma, the Muslim community, and not to any kafir nation. Thus he serves the umma before our country and deceives kafirs when it advances Islam. Believing that jihad in all of its forms is the true relationship between Muslims and kafirs, why would a Muslim defend Canada from an Islamic threat or protect the Canadian Constitution? The Bill of Rights offers all peoples freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Islamic Sharia law denies these rights to any human. The apostate of Islam can be killed without redress and freedom of speech is specifically denied as both Mohammed and the Koran may not be criticized. The doctrine of Islam makes a Muslim’s oath meaningless when made to kafirs, and Canada, if you are not a Muslim you are a kafir.
Summation: All Muslims are clearly commanded by their faith to enter a process of ‘naturalization fraud’ when they seek Citizenship of our nation. Case closed and time to start enacting sentence!
The Loss of Canadian Citizenship
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29, Canadian citizenship can be lost for specific reasons listed in the statute. One such reason for loss is by Order in cases of fraud: 10. (1). Subject to section 18 but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, where the Governor in Council, on a report from the Minister, is satisfied that any person has obtained, retained, renounced or resumed citizenship under this Act by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances, (a) the person ceases to be a citizen, or (b) the renunciation of citizenship by the person shall be deemed to have had no effect, as of such date as may be fixed by order of the Governor in Council with respect thereto. Presumption: (2) A person shall be deemed to have obtained citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances if the person was lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances and, because of that admission, the person subsequently obtained citizenship. 1974-75-76, c. 108, s. 9.
Note: Knowingly concealing of the true Islamic position with respect to ‘citizenship application and oaths’ has been proven, thus all Muslims are eligible to have their citizenship status immediately revoked. And, belief in the radical Islamic ideology itself should be grounds enough to deport immigrants, even after they have been naturalized. People are not to support totalitarian groups or affiliate with any that engage in advocating violence or ideologies that overthrow Canadian governance. The Islamic communities clearly comprise totalitarian entities for under Islam it is impossible to separate ‘church and state: “All civil authority bows to the wisdom of religious clerics in a theocracy. The best existing example (if one can use that descriptor loosely) of such a theocracy in action is the Islamic Republic of Iran. The worst example in recent memory is the Taliban when it ruled Afghanistan. Can one doubt that both examples point clearly to a totalitarian form of government in which no form of peaceful dissension or religious liberty is tolerated? In fact, dissension and religious differences are dealt with brutally.”
I believe necessary legislation or ‘order in council’ needs be enacted that bans anyone from becoming a citizen if he or she is a follower of Islam. This is but a necessary first step to ensure that Islam and sharia law can never supersede secular law and liberty in Canada. Further, the process must be started now of stripping all citizenship rights from Muslims for their failure to disclose their beliefs and true intents in the initial circumstance. As shown in the fatwas all practicing Muslims have been involved in naturalization fraud and their citizenship should be immediately rescinded or the laws of Canada become a bad joke! Immigration laws allowing Muslims into Canada should be immediately repealed for the protection of the Canadian public.
Denaturalized people usually revert to their prior immigration status, which is often as a permanent resident alien. Simple reverting to prior status is not sufficient for Muslims, for it still allows the perpetrators of deception and terrorism to wander our society at will. But resident aliens convicted of certain crimes, particularly national security crimes should be subject to immediate deportation. Even in the absence of a criminal conviction, permanent residents can be deported if they obtained that status through fraud or misrepresentation. It would seem quite clear that our Muslim miscreants should stand for deportation due to their fraudulent conduct. This cannot be a case by case, drawn out process but one of immediate enactment if those adhering to the Islamic faith do not renounce the commandments of the Qur’an that demands their pursuit of sharia law and the hate crimes perpetuated through their beliefs. It does not matter what generation of Muslims you are dealing with for they have all lied during the naturalization process. As a group, they should be forced to, either, vocally renounce their belief in the practice of undemocratic Islamic law or have their citizenship immediately revoked. This would not infringe on their civil liberties or human rights as they have no Canadian entitlement to such given their initial actions and faith based convictions. As to taking such an oath of renunciation, it is probably best along with the use of a polygraph as you are dealing with ‘faith justified liars’.
Do we have a catch 22 situation? Not really, it is simply a matter of Canada being the first nation to justifiably enforce its laws and become a Muslim free zone. This circumstance, whether you like it or not, is ultimately the only way you end the terrorist threats and Muslim foment from ‘sea to shining sea’. The federal government should require new immigrants to take an oath of loyalty to Canada and its values, deporting them if they breach it. They must take an oath swearing that they will give their complete allegiance and loyalty to Canada. Too much emphasis has been placed on the rights of newcomers rather than on their obligations as citizens of Canada. As well Canada’s official multiculturalism policy encourages immigrants to place the ‘loyalties and enmities’ of their homelands before their duty to Canada. These have been strong contributing factors in encouraging Muslims to treat our country as a convenient and generous platform from which to engage in or mount support for their favorite conflicts abroad.
It is time that all immigrants be made to understand it is their responsibility and not the governments that they comprehend what are core Canadian values. Clear notice of the expectation must be given that they earnestly strive to live up to Canadian values, not Islamic values, and if they violate them they shall be quickly ejected from Canada in the direction they came from. There is not much I just raised that was not already stressed on March 01, 2006 when former senior Foreign Affairs official Martin Collacott released a Fraser Institute report stressing ‘radical Islamic terrorists are currently the greatest danger to Canada’s security.’ This is the same catch-phrase statement that Blaney has just made. The Collacott advice and warnings were given 8 years ago from this publishing date. We would not be ‘hurried in dealing’ with Islamic extremism to the degree we are today if Harper had been elected to govern this nation before 2006!
Canadian politicians and all ‘groupies’: to procrastinate any further, you truly do so to your own peril, for “all faithful Muslims fundamentally agree on one basic precept in the Koran; that is, jihad or holy war against the infidel. Many millions of Muslims, both Sunni and Shiite, however, disagree on how to violently wage jihad. That is, whether to seize power politically by population density (as it was done in the UK) in order to get sharia law imposed, or to kill, bomb, and terrorize the infidel into submission. Once sharia law is declared legal by a democratic regime, it assumes its inexorably fascist form and is can only be stopped by that democratic host regime abolishing the law and holding Muslim’s accountable for their crimes against natural law, liberty and freedom of religion.”
“Millions of seemingly peaceful and loving Muslims regularly go to their Mosques, located in many cities, to worship their Islamic god and to earnestly pray that all infidels will eventually be forced to submit to Islam. In their scheduled meetings, these Muslims plan ways to make this happen, either violently or by subtle political subterfuge. It is wise to remember that all devout Muslims who render the Koran as the divine word of their god, Allah, have been commanded by their prophet, Mohammed, to lie, cheat, and deceive the infidel, by behaving in ways that Allah has forbidden them to do with other Muslims. Thus, they may do such things as drinking alcohol, eating pork and other foods they regard as unclean, cheating, and lying. The end result of the infidels’ submission to Allah, justifies any, and all means used to make that end result occur. This makes negotiating with Islam and compromising with it in any manner a truly suicidal affair.”
Three Necessary Political Actions to Be Taken Now
1. Removal of all Muslims from any position within government organizations that may be determined strategic to national security in any form.
2. Place an immediate moratorium on Muslim immigration.
3. Establish and fully enforce ‘The Criteria of Qualification for Immediate Arrest, Seizure and Deportation for Citizenship Fraud’
The Canadian Islamic Identity Crisis
The wearing of the niqab was disallowed for Canadian citizenship candidates in 2011 when reciting the Oath of Citizenship. This action taken by then Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney sparked confused people to debates and allowed duplicitous actions by sharia driven interest groups to advance their cause.
The matter reached another juncture through the actions of Toronto resident Zunera Ishaq who challenged the ruling that those taking the oath to do so without any face covering. Zunera Ishaq, a Pakistani national and Sunni Muslim who wears a niqab when in public, came to Canada in 2008 and passed her citizenship test at the end of 2013. She expressed willingness to unveil herself and recite the oath in private, but refused the demand she remove her niqāb in a public ceremony. After learning that she would have to remove her niqab in public for the oath-taking she wrote a letter asking that her ceremony be postponed, and filed an application for a review of the policy with the Federal Court in Jan. 2014. She was supported in her actions by the National Council of Canadian Muslims, the radicalized name change group discussed in Evil Times. And, as we know from the facts presented in my article there were and are serious ‘Islamic identity crisis issues’ at stake affecting our national security at play here. Yet, Federal Court Judge Keith M. Boswell who was appointed by Harper in 2014 ruled in Ishaq’s favor.
The following extracts come from the posting by Morgan Lowrie – CP February 12, 2015. Ishaq ‘had sued the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration claiming the government’s policy on veils violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” “A federal judge ruled in Ottawa last week that a portion of the law requiring citizenship candidates to remove their face coverings while taking the oath was unlawful.” “Speaking at an event in Quebec on Thursday, Harper said the government intends to appeal the ruling.” Harper stated: “I believe, and I think most Canadians believe that it is offensive that someone would hide their identity at the very moment where they are committing to join the Canadian family,” he said in Victoriaville, Que. “This is a society that is transparent, open, and where people are equal.”
Do not get caught into the bickering-legal debate about processes of oath taking for the issues at stake are what I have stated. Also, there is a general confusion as to the reality of the circumstance in many ongoing media sideshows that are out of contact with the reality of what Canadians truly think. Three of Canada’s major papers: the Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, and the National Post, all applauded the judge’s decision with editorials explaining how religious freedoms must prevail. This out to lunch bunch appear oblivious to the fact that the Islamic dress of the niqab and burka comprise a part of the Muslim sharia designed to subjugate and silence women. Of those who comprehend this, most appear to unfortunately see this matter as simply about the openness and the equality of men and women in Canada and not the intended Islamic political designs. However, as to the donning of the niqab for the Oath at issue: “An Angus Reid poll last year found 90% of Quebecers and nearly 70% of Canadians outside Quebec supported a proposed provincial ban on the niqab in government offices, schools, and publicly funded institutions.”
Nearly 70% of Canadians have already indicated that they would not support the decision reached by Keith M. Boswell as was stated. “To the extent that the Policy interferes with a citizenship judge’s duty to allow candidates for citizenship the greatest possible freedom in the solemnization or the solemn affirmation of the oath, it is unlawful,” he wrote.” Boswell, wake up and rescind your decision for there is no restriction of freedom in prevention of fraudulent actions. So do not get side-tracked nearly 70% of Canada and look to the security of the nation.
On Feb 26, 2015 Steve Rukavina posted the story of Quebec Judge Eliana Marengo telling mouthy Muslim El-Alloul, who appeared in her Montreal courtroom she would not hear her case until she removed her hijab. This created both a ‘garner your brownie points political muttering by Federal opposition parties’ and ‘standard Islamic whines’ orchestrated by the NCCM. But it also garnered a very simple response from PM Turner: “If someone is not covering their face, we believe they should be allowed to testify,” Harper spokesman Stephen Lecce said in a one-line statement.” http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-judge-wouldn-t-hear-case-of-woman-wearing-hijab-1.2974282 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/hijab-wearing-woman-should-be-allowed-to-testify-harper-spokesman-says-1.2975582
And, this one liner shows quite simply that Harper will not be drawn into useless bickering as the issue is not one about ‘head covering at all’ …it is about “face covering, concealment and values not conducive to the free and open society he espouses”. Wearing a turban does not conceal your identity whether you don it in the soccer field or serve in the RCMP. But, take a look at the Muslim dress shown in ascending order of concealment that follows. You will see quite clearly why Stephen Harper does not care about the hijab any more than the turban or the babushka worn by an old woman painting Easter Eggs! His genuine concern is about national security to a degree that few seem to have the courage to emulate.
Hijab is the noun form of the Arabic verb meaning “to cover” or “to shelter.” In general, hijab refers to any clothing a Muslim woman wears to fulfil the religion’s requirement for modest dress. However, the word has come to describe this headscarf that covers most of the hair and neck, and sometimes the shoulders. While this garment normally identifies the wearer as a follower of Islam the facial recognition identity is not hindered that would enable easier criminal behavior or security breaching. However, being ‘face free’ does not alter the fact that these individuals will deliberately lie to advance the cause of Islam.
A khemar is a headscarf that covers the head, neck, shoulders, upper body and arms, leaving only the face exposed. Khemar is the word used in the Qur’an when it refers to a veil or headscarf. Once again we see the general factors as with the hijab. However, being face free does not alter the fact that these individuals will deliberately lie to advance the cause of Islam.
The chador is a full-length garment made from a semi-circle of cloth draped over the head and open in the front. It is held shut with the hands or teeth and tied at the waist. The chador doesn’t have openings for the hands. It is usually associated with Muslim dress in Iran. A greater degree to concealment is evident. Does the Qur’an demand closure with the teeth so the hands can be free to carry a concealed bomb or to ensure the woman cannot clearly speak out? If held closed to such position with the hands the men have double protection of the girls not speaking rebellion in any form. I call this the ‘chador bomb free closure hold position’. It is bomb free as long as granny does not have it strapped to her torso. In any case, none of this alters the fact that this individual will deliberately lie to advance the cause of Islam.
Our notorious niqab is a headscarf that covers not only the hair, but also most of the face, leaving only the eyes exposed. You have already assumed this is a woman shown. Why? This could be an effeminate, homosexual or cross dressing transgender Muslim convert-pervert of some sort. In any case, none of this alters the fact that this individual will deliberately lie to advance the cause of Islam. And this is exactly what defines Zunera Ishaq: just another died in the wool liar advancing the cause of Islam. It is time to get your ‘head out of the bag babe’ at our public Citizen Oath ceremony or prepare to get out of Canada. The NCCM will be dragging their tails outward soon so simply latch onto one of lizards and continue to follow them.
The bulky burka is a head-to-toe covering seen often in Afghanistan. Women appearing in public were required to wear this covering, usually coloured grey or blue, during the country’s Taliban rule. The entire body is concealed, including the eyes, which are covered with a fabric net that allows the wearer to see. In Canada you normally run into these covered in black. Whatever the color does not alter the fact that these girls (if they are girls) will deliberately lie to advance the cause of Islam. Someone named this garb ‘La Bomba Bag Express’ which could be kind of appropriate given the increasing numbers of Islamic female suicide bombers.
Has the connection sunk in? This garb is not a ‘cultural or civil rights issue’, it is about, and represents a basic belief system that is at war with the Constitution and traditional values of Canada. And, Stephen Harper is not anti-any-culture, he simply is about ensuring Canada’s national security. National security is the #1 concern Canada faces and I believe a good Harper ad campaign could be taken from the successful Dollar Bill Clinton blurb coined by James Carville: “It’s the economy, stupid.”
So Canada, “It’s about national security, stupid!” And, Canada, I think you can rest assured that Harper will not be found in some Clinton-Monica Lewinsky style sexual posture in his office or elsewhere. The evidence of his personal convictions displayed in public office show some belief that “a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold. The rich and poor meet together: the Lord is the maker of them all. A prudent man foresees the evil, and hides himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22:1-3)
Phinehas/ Kenneth A Gran