THE QUR’AN IS HATE PROPAGANDA

 

Note: This is Sector One: Citizenship Treason, 1 of 5 sectors of The Qur’an Is Hate Propaganda. The Sectors will be ultimately amalgamated into one document and presented as body of information showing necessity for legal prosecution of Islam and Islamists within Canada.

Due to the immensity of the information being given, with amalgamation the document will be placed into pdf and available for easier sharing.

Sector One will take you approximately 20 to 24 hours to encompass, dependent upon your personal rate of conscientious information analysis.

Phinehas

 

qImages, words and sarcastic content necessary to fully elucidate the gravity of this topical sector and the necessity of its immediate rectification.


THE QUR’AN IS HATE PROPAGANDA

q1“For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light: (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;) Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” (Ephesians 5:8-11)

“I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.” (2 Timothy 4:1-4)

q2Introduction

You can choose to depart from the days of fables or continue onward in deception under some format of fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness called Islam.

The sectors in the writing following prove that THE QU’RAN IS HATE PROPAGANDA.

Proof is clearly established through the current existing Canadian Hate/Bias Crime legislation and Criminal Code of Canada.

It is shown that Islam promotes the universal genocide of all non-believers by their Allah, Prophet Muhammad and Sharia law.

Based upon the evidences given I will detail what the demands of our current legislative enactments require be done to rectify our present social dysfunctionalism.

q3Hate Crime as Defined in Canada

I admonish you to be very careful in your judgments and to “be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour. “(1 Peter 5:8)

For your personal well being please act in the light of this Word: “Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour. But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” (Leviticus 19:15; 2 Corinthians 4:3-4)

q4I have discussed the topic of hate/bias crime in-depth in the postings:   Hate Crimes in Canada – Part One         Hate Crimes Canada – Round Two     

From these postings, we give you these legal definitions:

Hate propaganda is defined as “any communication, writing, sign or visible representation that advocates or promotes genocide or makes statements, other than in private, that promote hatred against an identifiable group”.  An identifiable group is any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national origin, ethnic origin, language, religion, age, mental disability, physical disability or sexual orientation.

The Criminal Code of Canada defines hate/bias crime as “A criminal offence committed against a person or property, where there is evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate, based on the victim’s race, national or ethnic origin, language, color, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor”.

q5Enacting “genocide” means any action committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group through (a) killing members of the group; or (b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction. An “identifiable group” means any section of the public distinguished by color, race, religion or ethnic origin.

Criminal Harassment entails persistently following, communicating, watching or threatening any person or anyone known to that person when the perpetrators know or ought to know that the other person might reasonably fear for their safety or safety of anyone known to the victim. Criminal harassment laws prohibit the transmission, or repeated transmission of false information by any means, directly or indirectly, which is intended to injure or alarm any person or identifiable group.

Public Incitement of Hatred is the wilful promotion of hatred against any identifiable group by anyone through communicating statements in a public place where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace if guilty. A “public place” includes any place to which the public have access as a right or by invitation, express or implied; and “statements” includes words spoken or written or recorded electronically or electromagnetically or otherwise, and gestures, signs or other visible representations.

Canadian hate speech laws are basically enacted under two generalized sectors against individuals designated as offenders against the same “identifiable group” as defined for hate propaganda.  For example, the first time someone was charged with hate speech employed over the internet occurred on 27 March 1996. “A Winnipeg teenager was arrested by the police for sending an email to a local political activist that contained the message ‘Death to homosexuals’ it’s prescribed in the Bible! Better watch out next Gay Pride Week.’ (Nairne, 1996).”

A website that uses hate speech is called a hate site. And, differentiation between hate propaganda and hate speech is truly negligible, but sentencing is affected by the variant sectors of the Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act that one may be potentially charged under.

Rest assured that all adherents and proponents of Islam are both indictable and convictable under all sectors of definition given above. Further, it is my full intent to do everything within the scope of my capability to see all adherents and proponents of Islam are brought to full justice within the Nation of Canada.

To truly eradicate hate/bias crime in Canada you must begin through eradication of the chief proponent of such crime worldwide and that is Islam. There can no longer be a focus upon this issue from the sidetracking stances such as this sampling of recent cases and reports continue to do.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/meat-windshield-manitoba-islamic-association-1.3888683

http://globalnews.ca/news/2186544/exclusive-hate-crime-charges-laid-against-passenger-in-calgary-taxi-abuse-video/

Edmonton police’s Hate Crimes unit investigates ongoing distribution …

https://ca.yahoo.com/news/b-c-man-charged-allegedly-160053644.html

Suspect in custody after women wearing hijabs threatened with noose 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/mcgill-canada-make-canada-great-again-1.3886871

Unfortunately, such ‘knee jerk’ reactions as these reports show our societal body desperately trying to fight off a misdiagnosed infection that in truth is creating a terminal cancer. This ‘carcino-genetic’ agent in Canada’s multicultural milieu is Islam and “our fear of calling terrorism “Islamic” is getting people killed”. This was quite evident with our Parliament Hill and War Memorial Attacker Michael Zihaf-Bibeau.

Now, get this clear or suffer the results in your personal social well being: There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, or a moderate Islam. Listen to this former Muslim. https://youtu.be/8i5EG_fd7jo

q6The Islamic Death Procession from Country to Country can not be permitted to proceed any further onward in or through Canada.

Thus, I have no intention of carrying forward with the endless debate surrounding the matter of Islam in Canada. Evidence will be given from Surah and Hadith in the following five areas and the sections under existing Canadian jurisprudence that all Islamists and their supporters are to undergo prosecution. Concurrent with commencement of this legal dealing with Islam shall be the recommended political actions that should expedite the reconciliation and social healing needed in our nation. This healing is needed for the propaganda of the Qur’an and hadith incites genocide, hate/bias crime, female oppression, pedophilia and citizenship treason

The ordering of the areas requiring our expediency are: 1) Citizenship Treason 2) Hate/Bias Crime 3) Genocide 4) Female Oppression and 5) Pedophilia.

q7SECTOR ONE: CITIZENSHIP TREASON

Introduction

We are going to enter this arena through the general heading of Citizenship Treason to elucidate why no follower of Islam can be permitted Canadian Citizenship.

All followers of Islam that have taken the Canadian Citizenship Oath of Allegiance are guilty of a deliberate act of fraud to gain the status of a Canadian citizen. Islam forbids the swearing of allegiance to any foreign government or agency that is not following Islam and Sharia.

When a follower of Islam does take the Canadian Oath of Allegiance theirs is truly a subversive action designed to ultimately bring down our legal system and subjugate our nation to Islam.

A renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East, Bernard Lewis, says Islam imposes, without limit of time or space, the duty to subjugate non-Muslims. He writes on p. 73 of The Political Language of Islam: “…it is the duty of those who have accepted them (Allah’s word and message) to strive unceasingly to convert or at least to subjugate those who have not. This obligation is without limit of time or space. It must continue until the whole world has either accepted the Islamic faith or submitted to the power of the Islamic state.”

And, as to Islamic methods of infidel subjugation we find in Sahih Muslim 19: 4294: “Muhammad says Muslims in a position of strength should impose three choices on non-Muslims: 1) become Muslim; or 2) pay protection money for the right to live precariously, as a second-class citizen; or 3) be killed.”

q8Democracy

A democracy is a system in which all people are equal before the law, regardless of race, religion or gender.  The vote of every individual counts as much as the vote of any other, and through voting the collective will of the people then determines the rules of society.

lslam is in no manner compatible with Democracy for Islamic law is absolutely adversarial with true democracy. It is a theocratic system with Allah alone at its head. Allah’s law is interpreted by a ruling body of clerics. They leave no room for a secular political system in which all people are treated as equals.

Under Islamic law, only Muslim males are entitled to full rights.  The standing of women is stated as half that of men and often even less.  Non-Muslims have no equal standing with Muslims.  In fact, a Muslim cannot be put to death for killing an unbeliever.

An Islamic state is guided by Islamic law (Sharia) derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah (hadith).  A body of clerics interprets this law and applies it to all Muslim circumstances social, cultural and political.  The flowers of Islam are never to be placed above the Qur’an and Sunnah any more than man should be placed above Allah.

q9Tolerant Verses

Many contemporary Muslims claim that traditional Islamic practice is out of step with modern tastes and make very imaginative efforts to reinterpret the long-held traditions of their religion.

However, one of the core principals of Islam is Naskh (Nasikh) which ensconces their understanding that newer revelation cancels older revelation.  “None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Know thou not that Allah hath power over all things?” Al-Baqarah 2:106

Muslims who truly understand the principle of Nasikh deceptively quote the Qur’an, attempting to trick the media and non-Muslims into thinking Islam is peaceful and tolerant of non-Muslims. But, there is a dividing point in the life of Muhammad where the substitution of ‘something better or similar’ took place. That point comes after what are called the Medina verses, written at a time when Muhammad was telling his disciples to pray toward towards Jerusalem in an effort to sway Jews to convert to Islam. The Jews did not fall victim to his manipulative ploy and thus suddenly he slaughtered the Jews, instructing his followers to forget praying towards Jerusalem and to start praying towards Mecca.

Muhammad taught toleration towards non-Muslims during the Medina phase, then substituted ‘something better or similar’ and during the Meccan phase started teaching ‘death to non-Muslims’. Muslim leaders (Imams) deliberately quote from the abolished Medina sections of the Qur’an claiming Muhammad preached tolerance. These Imams clearly know that the later sections of the Qur’an when Muhammad was at Mecca, the ones preaching death to non-Muslims are the better way of Islam as demanded by their prophet, Qur’an and hadith.

To comprehend why Islam is free to create unlimited warfare, havoc and death you need to understand that Surah 9 of the Qur’an is the last major chapter revealed to Muslims and it is filled with commands and exhortations to fight and kill non-Muslims.  And as shown in the Qur’an and hadith the commands in Surah 9 supersede all other commands in the Qur’an.

The Muslim cry for death is due to their burning hatred of Jews, Christians and all they claim hypocritical towards Islam. This is explicit in the Qur’an.  This fact is going to be fully exemplified to facilitate the charges that shall be ultimately leveled for prosecution regarding Hate/Bias Crime and Genocide that is espoused in our nation.

 q10Muslims Are Blessed for Lying

Islam teaches that Muslims are to fight when they have sufficient strength to win, and that fighting (jihad) for Allah is obligatory. When not strong enough to vanquish their enemies, Islamists are told to lay low until such a time as they can. And, through jihad they are free to employ any tactic necessary to win. Thus, all Muslims are potential liars for the sake of Allah in achieving their demanded goal of ultimate global domination. Allah calls them to be liars and promises great blessings for being such.

Al-Bukhari, the compiler of the most respected canonical hadith collection, recorded that Abu Ad-Darda, a close companion and pupil of Muhammad, said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Further, Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah or taqiyyah (deception on behalf of Islam), is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.”

Leaders in the Arab world often say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic. Yasser Arafat was famous for whipping Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews right after telling Western newspapers about his desire for peace with Israel.

The Liar Through Speech

There are two forms of lying to unbelievers that Muslims are to employ in order to defeat their enemies. One is al-Taqiyya: Saying something that isn’t true if it relates to preserving the true Muslim identity and intent. By definition Taqiyya means deception; the Islamic word for concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies.

Two is Kitman: lying by omission through deliberately leaving something out. An example is when Muslims quote only a fragment of a verse such as from Al-Ma’idah 5:32 that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”. They try to insinuate that Islam does not condone murder while neglecting to state that the rest of verse 5:32 and verse 5:33 mandate murder in undefined cases of ‘corruption’ and ‘mischief.’

Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection and advances sharia.

The Liar Through Action

Further, Muslims also practice both Tawriyah, which is intentionally creating a false impression, and Muruna, which is ‘blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others. These were practices employed by the 9/11 hijackers through going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well that the host of a popular American television show, John Walsh, claimed well after the events of 9/11 that their bar trips were evidence of ‘hypocrisy’. No, there was no hypocrisy in the 9/11 twin towers boys. They were simply following the Qur’anic directives for jihad.

An-Nahl 16:106 establishes there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.  Whoever disbelieved in Allah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a great torment.” The Muslim may renounce his religion, or participate in actions that deny his religion, while his heart remains secure in his faith. There is no sin on those who say or do things which are contrary to what they believe in their hearts if it achieves the goal of Islamic domination. They can lie without any guilt or fear of accountability or retribution when it is in their interest to do so and it is beneficial to the cause of Islam. For devout Muslims, the concealment of a truth in any manner, is not an abandonment of Allah’s truth in any manner, if it benefits Islam in any manner.

These people do not lie because they are simply liars by nature, they are Allah ordained systematic liars by choice. The overall principle guiding the Muslim is that one should consider the bad consequences entailed by lying to the consequences entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging to Islam, one is entitled to lie.

There are many circumstances when a Muslim may be compelled to deceive others for the greater purpose of ensconcing sharia. And the Quran and hadith state this unequivocally.

Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman to have sex and (4) to facilitate one on his journey of advancing Islam.

I will provide you a few examples and you can examine an in-depth outline of all pertinent scripture and hadith showing Taqiyya (lying, deceiving, illusion) is Islam’s most important ideological …  war tool. This is a fairly massive resource base surrounding taqiyya in all its aspects. So first watch the next video link.

It will probably help you to accept the truth through listening to an Arabic speaking former Muslim carefully explain to you Ale-Imran 3:28, and just why a Muslim can lie to you with impunity.

{ لاَّ يَتَّخِذِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ ٱلْكَافِرِينَ أَوْلِيَآءَ مِن دُونِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَمَن يَفْعَلْ ذٰلِكَ فَلَيْسَ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ فِي شَيْءٍ إِلاَّ أَن تَتَّقُواْ مِنْهُمْ تُقَـٰةً وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ ٱللَّهُ نَفْسَهُ وَإِلَىٰ ٱللَّهِ ٱلْمَصِيرُ }

 “(Let not the believers take) the believers ought not to take [the hypocrites:] ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy and his companions [and] (disbelievers) the Jews (for their friends) so as to become mighty and honourable (in preference to believers) who are sincere. (Whoso doeth that) seeking might and honour [by taking the hypocrites and disbelievers as friends] (hath no connection with Allah) has no honour, mercy or protection from Allah (unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them) save yourselves from them, (taking (as it were) security) saving yourselves from them by speaking in a friendly way towards them with, while your hearts dislikes this. (Allah bideth you beware (only) of Himself) regarding the shunning of unlawful killing, unlawful sex, unlawful property, consuming intoxicants, false testimony and associating partners with Allah. (Unto Allah is the journeying) the return after death.” Ale-Imran 3:28

https://youtu.be/xHzFkky1qZI

Employing deceit is no problem to the Islamic mind. As just witnessed we see Allah telling Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to ‘guard themselves’ against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not, and do not feel that way.   U.S. Islamist Group: Fake Friendship with Non-Believers 

The heart’s intent.

Found amid the instructions surrounding marriage are instructions explaining why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good. The context of these verses is clear in that Allah calls you to account only for the intention in your hearts.

Al-Baqarah 2:225: “Allah does not impose blame upon you for what is unintentional in your oaths, but He imposes blame upon you for what your hearts have earned. And Allah is Forgiving and Forbearing.”

An-Nahl 16:106: “Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced to renounce his religion while his heart is secure in faith. But those who willingly open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah, and for them is a great punishment;”

Makara

From Lane’s Lexicon, the most revered and scholarly English dictionary of the Arabic language, we find our definition of makara. Makara literally means deception, deceit: to practice deceit or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to exercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice stratagem.

So, prepare to bow down to Allah as the King of Makara, for Allah is the chief of deceivers and schemers.  In the following Qur’an verses, Allah reveals to us that he is the ‘best deceiver and schemer’.

Ali ‘Imran 3:54 “And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers (makir*).” Literal translation.

Al-Anfal 8:30 “And when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you, or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive, and God deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers (makir*). Literal translation.

*This word makir (schemer) is a very strong disparaging word and Abdel-Nour defines such persons as “sly, dishonest, cunning, wily, deceivers” who set out to cheat you by deception. Such is the nature of Allah and his devout adherents.

q11The Great Deceiver and Hudna

For certain Allah is the best deceiver. Watch as ex-Muslim Wally Shoebat tells us Walid Shoebat – Why muslims deceive us 1 of 2  This will help edify as to why Allah is the great deceiver. It will also clarify why peace negotiations, dialog or “hudna” with Muslims is an illusion they use to deceive and destroy. You can round it off with reading Allah the Best Deceiver – WikiIslam  should you desire.

And these Allah induced liars, cheaters, schemers and killers are the people Trudeau and crew are trying so strongly to embrace. Trudeau wants a renewed relationship with Iran. Any ‘peace pacts’ made with Iranians or any other Muslim creeps is simply written on the sand. They can say, fabricate or agree to whatever they believe you desire to hear with no intent of honoring anything. Under Islam all forms of lying are permitted for the end justifies the means in enabling sharia.

Muhammad even admits he is a liar, breaking his oaths when it suits him and advises that it is acceptable for Muslims to do the same. Expiate means to offer a sacrifice for sinning. Muhammad says just sin as you desire and then offer a sacrifice for doing so.

Sahih al-Bukhari 7: 67:427: “Narrated Zahdam: We were in the company of Abu Musa Al-Ash’ari and there were friendly relations between us and this tribe of Jarm.  Abu Musa was presented with a dish containing chicken. Among the people there was sitting a red-faced man who did not come near the food. Abu Musa said to him, “Come on and eat, for I have seen Allah’s Apostle eating chicken.” He said, “I have seen it eating something dirty and since then I have disliked it, and have taken an oath that I shall not eat it ‘ Abu Musa said, “Come on, I will narrate to you. Once I went to Allah’s Apostle with a group of Al-Ash’ariyin, and met him while he was angry, distributing some camels of Rakat. We asked for mounts but he took an oath that he would not give us any mounts, and added, ‘I have nothing to mount you on’ In the meantime some camels of booty were brought to Allah’s Apostle and he asked twice, ‘Where are Al-Ash’ariyin?” So, he gave us five white camels with big humps. We stayed for a short while and after we had covered a little distance, then I said to my companions, “Allah’s Apostle has forgotten his oath. By Allah, if we do not remind Allah’s Apostle of his oath, we will never be successful.” So, we returned to the Prophet and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We asked you for mounts, but you took an oath that you would not give us any mounts; we think that you have forgotten your oath.’ He said, ‘It is Allah Who has given you mounts. By Allah, and Allah willing, if I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.’ “

Hudna

These people even try to project themselves as the true ‘peace makers’, bringing the duped into pacts and alliances to enable their ultimate domination.  Sahih Bukhari 49:857:  “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.”  He is simply a good Muslim.

Hudna from the Arabic هدنة meaning “calm” or “quiet” is a truce, armistice or intermission. It is sometimes mistranslated as “cease-fire for a fixed duration”, but do not complicate the meaning for hudna when in reality, its definition is simple: it is a temporary treaty, a pause to regroup, to rearm and to prepare for the next fight.

The term hudna is loaded with implicit religious inferences, but in essence it is nothing more than an Islamic code-word signifying they have entered into an agreement they mean to violate. It is any agreement that the Muslim is obligated by the Qur’an to abrogate.

A display of Muhammad employing hudna is in his dealing with the Quraysh tribe in 628 C.E.  Some six years prior Muhammad and his group had abandoned Mecca to locate to Yathrib, today’s Medina. Desiring to return to Mecca to perform a pilgrimage he marched till he reached al-Hudaybiyya which lay at the limit of the Haram, the sacred territory of Mecca, and at a distance of nine miles from Mecca. The prophet had been born into the Banu Hashim clan of the Quraysh tribe who controlled Mecca, but to this point Mecca had staunchly resisted the prophet, so here he ground to a halt.

At al-Hudaybiyya his small band was forced to negotiate a false peace treaty through the Quraysh rulers of Mecca for the majority of Arabs had yet to convert to Islam, and to high degree Mecca was under economic control of mercantile Jews. The agreement (hudna) called the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was to be in effect for 10 years and was to permit Muhammad’s unarmed returns for pilgrimages during such time. Some two years after its enactment Muhammad had built up his force sufficient to return with more men and force of arms to take over the city of Mecca.

The authoritative Islamic Encyclopedia of London (1922) defines hudna as a temporary treaty which can be approved or abrogated by Islamic religious leaders, depending on whether or not it serves the interests of Islam; a hudna cannot last for more than 10 years.

This event of 628 is of enormous significance for the classical understanding of jihad, for it set a pattern of duplicitous peaceful retreat followed by regrouping and rearming, which permits an attack on territory previously left behind. Through the course of history, hudna became the standard term to describe a cessation of hostilities during jihad. The Hudaybiyyah Treaty, made by the Prophet Mohammad with the unbelievers of Mecca in 628, set the precedent for subsequent treaties which the Prophet’s successors made with non-Muslims. And the precedent remains intact to date for all true followers of the Prophet.

Muslims distinguish the hudna from other forms of disengagement, such as that termed fitna which is the process applied to end sedition or civil strife. As well, they employ the term tahadia to describe a temporary halt in hostile activity which they feel free to violate at any time in any manner. It is fully as deceitful as hudna, but there is no signatory action or documentation involved. But if you hear the expression Hudaybiyyah mentioned in your agreements kaffirs, you can rest assured that you have agreed to a treaty that is meant to be broken.

Today’s jihad is war waged against the entire world, but Israel remains its focus. There will be no end to the religiously-inspired struggle until Messiah returns for jihad is unending to this point. Most Westerners appear still unable to fully grasp the fact that Islam is not a religion in either the Judeo-Christian or Far Eastern sense. In particular, understanding is difficult for Islam has embedded so many erroneous Jewish and Christian personalities and events in its Qur’an and hadith. Islam can be a very confusing territory to enter into.

The term Islam itself means ‘submission’ and applies both to you as an individual’s submitting to God and to a society in totals acceptance of their conquest by Muslim forces. A territory ruled or once ruled by Muslims is called dar al-Islam. All territory ruled by unbelievers is called dar al-Harb which means the realm of war. For Islam, Canada is the realm of war outwardly allowing its adherents to worship freely and perform other religious duties on their pathway to absolute dar al-Islam worldwide. There is a standard format being practiced in bringing this about.

Invasion and Conquest within our land.

q12Stage 1: Infiltration
Stage 2: Concentration of Power
Stage 3: Open War with Leadership and Culture
Stage 4: Totalitarian Islamic “Theocracy”
https://civilusdefendus.wordpress.com/2010/01/10/4-stages-of-islamic-conquest/

The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest is also available in pdf format as part of Liberty vs Shariafor easy sharing.

q13Allah even states he created a deceiving Jesus for Christianity, taking the real one to be with him. The real Islamic Jesus at the direction of Allah will return on the Day of Resurrection to be a witness against those that believed he was the son of God. This is why the boys grin and snicker for they know why Christians think that Jesus was crucified. They know it simply because Allah admits that he made it appear so:

An-Nisa 4:157-159: “And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise. And there is none from the People of the Scripture but that he will surely believe in Jesus before his death. And on the Day of Resurrection he will be against them a witness.”

So, we see Allah admits to making it appear to people that Jesus was crucified and died on the cross, fully admitting to deceiving people for the next 600 years. With Christianity evolving from Judaism, both were allowed to become distorted packs of deception and lies, before he sent Muhammad with the Qur’an to sort out the mess that he himself had created.

With this Allah, so supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, and his Prophet the perfect example of Allah in employing deception, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. In fact, they are required to do the same or suffer for not doing so.

They conduct their jihad, their warfare for Allah, based in deceit from start to finish. Sahih Bukhari 52:269: “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.” The true man of Islam is fully prepared to lie to trick his enemies and he is also instructed to kill those who will not follow such instructions from Allah and his prophet.  Sahih Bukhari 84:64-65: “Narrated ‘Ali: Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah’s Apostle, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you that is not a Hadith then it was indeed a trick.  I may say things just to cheat my enemy. No doubt I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection.”

Are not over 1400 years of Islamic barbaric war history enough? We know that the “Dar al-harb” means that Islam is in constant war with all countries and areas that are not subject to Islam. The goal today remains as it was when Islam was birthed.  All Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhist, atheists and infidels of any sort shall be subject to Islam through infiltration, conversion, murder, lying, confusion, dupes and deception. Islam will destroy all other countries’ religion, culture and history worldwide to ensconce its sharia.

Watch this video for a short taste of the actual reality of the immensity of Islamic jihad and how it advanced during its first 548 offensive battles. Then grasp the reality about the handful of defensive battles that were fought and labeled as the Crusades.  Bill Warner, PhD: Jihad vs Crusades – YouTube

Islam has remained, and shall remain at constant war with all Western democracies built on foundations of Judaism and Christianity. Thus, Islam must be driven out of Canada.

 q14KAFFIRS: No problem, tell them anything you need to until they submit or you can kill them.

The Quran’s ‘laws surrounding equality’ assigns human values and rights based on gender, religion and social status. This is the polar opposite of equality in the sense intended by Canadian political-social tradition which makes no such distinctions. The Qur’an devaluation of non-Muslims is so foul that it teaches that while a Muslim may be punished with death for murdering a fellow Muslim, no Muslim can be put to death for killing a non-Muslim.

Bukhari 83:17: “Narrated `Abdullah: Allah’s Messenger said, “The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshiped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam, an apostate that and leaves the Muslims.”

Bukhari 83:50: “Narrated Abu Juhaifa: I asked ‘Ali “Do you have anything Divine literature besides what is in the Qur’an?” Or, as Uyaina once said, “Apart from what the people have?” ‘Ali said, “By Him Who made the grain germinate and created the soul, we have nothing except what is in the Quran and the ability of understanding Allah’s Book which He may endow a man with, and what is written in this sheet of paper.” I asked, “What is on this paper?” He replied, “The legal regulations of Diya (Blood-money) and the ransom for releasing of the captives, and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever).”

Bukhari 3:111: “Narrated Ash-Sha’bi: Abu Juhaifa said, “I asked Ali, ‘Have you got any book which has been revealed to the Prophet apart from the Qur’an?’ ‘Ali replied, ‘Nothing, except Allah’s Book or the power of understanding which has been bestowed by Allah upon a Muslim, or what is written on this sheet of paper with me.’ Abu Juhaifa said, “I asked, ‘What is written on this sheet of paper?’ Ali replied, it deals with The Diyya, (blood money) the compensation paid by the killer to the relatives of the victim, the ransom for the releasing of the captives from the hands of the enemies, and the law that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for the killing of a disbeliever.

It is clearly claimed Muhammad flatly stated: “No Muslim can be killed for killing a kafir”.

q15If you are not a Muslim you are what the Qur’an defines as a kafir, so it is time to clear your heads and start to right the wrongs you perpetuate within this nation and our Canadian Parliamentary system. I am going to let the words of Bill Warner aptly tell you how the Muslim truly views you ‘kafir groupies’.

“The Koran defines kafirs. The word “unbeliever” does not remotely carry the meaning of kafir. A kafir is less than human. The word “kafir” is the worst word in the human language. Kafirs can be hated, assassinated, deceived, enslaved, robbed, plotted against, raped, tortured, mocked and demeaned in every way.

Mohammed repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive the kafir in order to advance Islam. Deceiving kafirs is Sunna, in the way of Mohammed, the perfect Muslim. A Muslim is to tell the truth to another brother Muslim, but, if it will advance Islam, they can deceive the kafir. Does this mean that a Muslim deceives kafirs all the time? Of course not, but if it advances Islam, deception is ethical. Mohammed said: war is deception. Who is the war with? Kafirs are the only enemy of Islam. Mohammed was at a state of permanent war with them. During the last 9 years of his life, he launched and led a violent event on the average of every 6 weeks. He employed deception against the kafirs again and again. Deception is Sunna.

Jihad against the kafir is Sunna. Jihad is also successful. In brief: Mohammed preached the religion of Islam for 13 years in Mecca. He was driven out of Mecca and went to Medina. In Medina he became a politician and a warrior. Islam then grew from a religion to a political force, and Mohammed died without an enemy left standing. Jihad brought him total success. Jihad can be any action or word that brings pressure against the kafir. Jihad is by the sword, pen, speech and money. A jihadist does not always have to kill kafirs. This means that deception-jihad, can be practiced in many areas to advance Islam. For instance, a Muslim translator or FBI agent can “shade” their work to conceal facts from the kafirs”.

This first video provides some very pertinent insights as to the Muslim way of thinking about the kaffir     3:46 >    Bill Warner, PhD: No Sympathy for Kafirs  And the following  states ways in which North Americans are already under aspects of sharia law.  4:54 >   Bill Warner, PhD: Sharia and Kafirs  The final video is by a Muslim cleric vehemently proclaiming from the Qur’an why no Muslim is to befriend a kaffir.  https://youtu.be/VXBWM6oOBFc    

Kaffir is a highly insulting Arabic term used to refer to all non-Muslims. But to black South Africans living in the African heat of surrounding rabid Islamic incursions its vocalization has more vehement results. While many South Africans are Muslims, to the general black South African population it has evolved to the equivalent of using the ‘Nigger slur’ of the true red neck in North America. So, watch this you kaffirs:  ▶ 1:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xTmU4UJYsY

This should have given you something to think about, you who run around shooting your mouths off believing you can do so with impunity. Jews and Christians are the ultimate kaffirs and you disparage them endlessly in your mindless embrace of Islam. The Muslim welcomes and embraces you for doing so, but the day fast approaches when it shall be you being kicked senseless you foolish kaffirs. I posted you this warning nearly a year ago on February 24, 2016 as HATI-HATI KAFIR  and the tide of Islamic terrorism has only increased in Canada and more so worldwide .

When the brunt of the Muslim wrath starts to personally fall on you, do not look for help from those you helped among them.

Al-Qasas 28:17: “O my Lord! For that Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace on me, never shall I be a help to those who sin!” All kaffirs are sinners to the Muslim.

“Against kaffirs make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war to strike terror into the hearts of the Enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides, whom you may not know, but whom Allah does know. Whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah, shall be repaid to you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.” Al-Anfal 8:60

q16The following verse states that the kaffirs are to be killed or crucified for making ‘corruption in the land’.

Verse 5:33 says:   “The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Here after theirs will be an awful doom.”

Truly the Qur’an Sanctifies Lying: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” This matter is covered fully under Genocide. (Section Three) of this documentation. Christians and Jews as portrayed in the Quran and hadith and spoken to in the mosques in a manner that qualifies all Islamists as indictable under the Incitement of Public hatred. Muslims in essence state the Christians and Jews to be the Ultimate Kafirs deserving extinction under their beliefs of Islam.

 

q17LOYALTY TO A NON-MUSLIM GOVERNMENT is not permissible for followers of Islam.

Indeed, as can be seen through the Islamic notion of hudna, radical Muslims do not feel themselves bound to respect any pact which they might sign with non-Muslims, and they will break such agreements as soon as they feel it is to their advantage to do so. And they are certain they will ultimately gain advantage for An-Nisa 4:141 tells them “never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way to triumphs over the believers.”

If Muslims are loyal to the non-Muslim countries in which they live it is in spite of Islamic teachings and they are apostate to Islam. Unlike other faiths, Islam is not just a religion but a political system as well. The state is to be inseparable from Islamic religious rule. Islamic law, or Sharia, is claimed complete and not designed to coexist with or be subordinate to any other legal systems. 

q18The Muslims you embrace are truly vultures in chicken feathers and not the birds you think have flown into your coop. For, genuine loyalty to Canada and its values simply is not possible for adherents to the Qur’an.

Now, to sort out the chickens that should be allowed to strut around the Canadian barnyard is not an impossible task, and it truly is one that must be addressed in timely fashion by our government. In our ‘ball game’ of Canadian national security I will give you three examples why all Muslims have struck out and why they should be returned to the ‘dugouts’ they straggled in from.

One: Muslims are not to show honor or loyalty to Canada by standing for our national anthem. If unable to avoid such action they are commanded to act in a duplicitous manner as Fatwas # 85728 and others indicate. “So, it is unlawful to stand up for such a thing and Muslims should make sure that anything they do conforms with these rules. Blind imitation of disbelievers is rejected. It is reported from Abu Dawood that the Prophet said: “Whoever imitates some people, he is one of them.” So, the Muslim should not commit this Haram unless there is dire necessity like fearing to be jailed or beaten. In this case, he may make believe that he is standing for the anthem but keeps on remembering Allah and should feel deep sorrow for doing such a thing. Indeed, standing for these flags and anthems is a glorification of them. And if the person intends by such act any glorification of these things similar to glorifying Allah, then he becomes a Kafir, and moves away from Islamic religion. Allah knows best.”

It does not matter whether it is in spiritual, civil or social matters, the Qur’an is very clear that Muslims are to resist unbelievers by any means until Islam establishes political supremacy. They are not to follow the ways of the democratic society nor be tricked into doing so.

Al-Maida 5:49: “So judge between them by that which Allah hath revealed, and follow not their desires, but beware of them lest they seduce thee from some part of that which Allah hath revealed unto thee”

Muslim loyalty belongs to Allah’s Qur’an not to any government or its rituals of allegiance or obedience.  A Muslim ‘citizen’ is in a position of divided loyalty if he in sincerity were to swear an oath of allegiance to our nation, or with a genuine heart to sing the National Anthem. He would in fact be accused of failing to submit to the theocracy of Allah, cast into the ranks of the hypocrites and defined as Muslim in name only. As a hypocrite and apostate he can be murdered.

Two: Muslims are not to obtain citizenship of a non-Muslim country, nor to make a pledge of allegiance to such country without dire necessity. Fatwas # 202420 is but one stating this, and again we see the command to act in a fraudulent manner so they can achieve their ends. “We have explained in them that in case of dire necessity, a Muslim who gives the pledge of allegiance to one of these governments may conceal his intention and use Tawriyah by saying something which has more than one meaning and intending a meaning different from what the listener is likely to understand, like to intend his allegiance only to the Muslims in those lands and to benefit that country by guiding its people to enter Islam. However, the Muslim does not become a disbeliever by merely repeating these words which contain allegiance to the people of Kufr, as long as his heart remains at rest with faith.”  Khiyar al-tarwiyah literally means the option to consider, similar to the option given a buyer to rescind a contract of sale after some consideration. In our circumstance discussed the fatwas declares some means of how to enter the fraudulent agreement in safe Islamic manner.

Three: As a general rule the Muslim is forbidden to live among us because it can have many negative effects on his practice of Islam. As Fatwas # 82552 states “Living in a non-Muslim country or migration to it is permissible only if a person cannot find a Muslim country where he can earn a livelihood and can practice his religion freely. It is also permissible for Muslim scholars to live in non-Muslim countries for the purpose of Da’wah i.e., calling non-Muslims to Islam and teaching Muslims sharia rules, provided they can do so freely and would not be subjected to trials or would have to compromise or leave their religion.”

In the above are some details related to the rule of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries. But the rules for applying and accepting citizenship of those countries is much more restricted. A Muslim is not permitted to apply for citizenship of non-Muslim countries except in a dire need, such as not being able to practice his religion in his own country, in fear of or being in danger for his life, or facing the threat of imprisonment or torture in his homeland. As well, he must be unable to situate to an Islamic country where he can live. In such circumstances one can apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country. If he is obliged to take an oath for getting citizenship, at that moment of speaking he must be mentally alluding to a loyalty toward Islam in such manner as to be free of the stated allegiance to the host country.

However, if he is able to live harmlessly in the non-Muslim country without taking the citizenship oath then applying for citizenship is not permissible for him. It is also forbidden for him to apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country if he is simply aspiring to material comforts or financial gain.

It is quite clear that the Citizenship Oath or Oath of Allegiance is something the Muslim is to try to avoid, and if participating they are to do so from a fraudulent mindset. This is why you hear the Muslim whine about the matter of not wearing the niqab in ‘legal circumstances’.

But what is the worth of an oath of any kind from someone who practices deception because his ‘religion tells him to do so when it advances his agenda? Zero! Muslims owe their alliance to the umma, the Muslim community, and not to any kafir nation. Thus, the Muslim serves the umma before our country and deceives kafirs when it advances Islam. Believing that jihad in all of its forms is the true relationship between Muslims and kafirs, why would a Muslim defend Canada from an Islamic threat or protect the Canadian Constitution? The Bill of Rights offers all peoples freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Islamic Sharia law denies these same rights to any human. The apostate of Islam can be killed without redress and freedom of speech is specifically denied as both Mohammed and the Qur’an may not be criticized. The doctrine of Islam makes a Muslim’s oath meaningless when made to kafirs, and Canada is a kaffir nation. To all in Canada: If you are not a Muslim you are a kafir.

Summation: All Muslims are clearly commanded by their faith to enter a process of ‘naturalization fraud’ when they seek Citizenship of our nation. The case is closed and it is time to start enacting appropriate sentence for this duplicity. To do so you must be familiar with the Canadian Citizenship Act:  https://zoupio.lexum.com/calegis/rsc-1985-c-c-29-en

 

q19The Loss of Canadian Citizenship

Pursuant to Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29, Canadian citizenship can be lost for specific reasons listed in the statute. One such reason for loss is by Order in cases of fraud: 10. (1). Subject to section 18 but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, where the Governor in Council, on a report from the Minister, is satisfied that any person has obtained, retained, renounced or resumed citizenship under this Act by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances, (a) the person ceases to be a citizen, or (b) the renunciation of citizenship by the person shall be deemed to have had no effect, as of such date as may be fixed by order of the Governor in Council with respect thereto. Presumption: (2) A person shall be deemed to have obtained citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances if the person was lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances and, because of that admission, the person subsequently obtained citizenship. 1974-75-76, c. 108, s. 9.

Note: Knowingly concealing of the true Islamic position with respect to ‘citizenship application and oaths’ has been proven, thus all Muslims are eligible to have their citizenship status immediately revoked. And, belief in the radical Islamic ideology itself should be grounds enough to deport immigrants, even after they have been naturalized. People are not to support totalitarian groups or affiliate with any that engage in advocating violence or ideologies that overthrow Canadian governance. The Islamic communities clearly comprise totalitarian entities for under Islam it is impossible to separate their church and state.

 “All civil authority bows to the wisdom of religious clerics in a theocracy. The best existing example (if one can use that descriptor loosely) of such a theocracy in action is the Islamic Republic of Iran. The worst example in recent memory is the Taliban when it ruled Afghanistan. Can one doubt that both examples point clearly to a totalitarian form of government in which no form of peaceful dissension or religious liberty is tolerated? In fact, dissension and religious differences are dealt with brutally.”

I believe necessary legislation or ‘order in council’ needs be enacted that bans anyone from becoming a Canadian citizen if he or she is a follower of Islam. This is but a necessary first step to ensure that Islam and sharia law can never supersede secular law and liberty in Canada. Further, the process must be started now of stripping all citizenship rights from Muslims for their failure to disclose their beliefs and true intents in the initial circumstance. As shown in the fatwas all practicing Muslims have been involved in naturalization fraud and their citizenship should be immediately rescinded or the laws of Canada continue onward as a bad joke. Immigration laws allowing Muslims into Canada should be immediately repealed for the protection of the Canadian public.

Denaturalized people usually revert to their prior immigration status, which is often as a permanent resident alien. Simple reverting to prior status is not sufficient for Muslims, for it still allows the perpetrators of deception and terrorism to wander our society at will. All resident aliens convicted of certain crimes, particularly national security crimes should be subject to immediate deportation.

But, even in the absence of a criminal conviction, permanent residents can be deported if they obtained that status through fraud or misrepresentation. It would seem quite clear that our Muslim miscreants should stand for deportation due to their fraudulent conduct. This cannot be a case by case, drawn out process but one of immediate enactment if those adhering to the Islamic faith do not renounce the commandments of the Qur’an that demands their pursuit of sharia law and the hate crimes perpetuated through their beliefs.

It does not matter what generation of Muslims you are dealing with for they have all lied during the naturalization process. As a group, they should be forced to, either, vocally renounce their belief in the practice of undemocratic Islamic law or have their citizenship immediately revoked. This would not infringe on their civil liberties or human rights as they have no Canadian entitlement to such given their initial fraudulent actions and faith based convictions. As to taking such an oath of renunciation, it is probably best along with the use of a polygraph process of sorts as you are dealing with ‘faith justified liars’.

THE KING OF CATCH 22

In ways, the term Catch 22 can be a hindering expression, one giving an illusion a situation exists that a person has no way out of. The Cambridge English Dictionary defines it as “a situation in which there are only two possibilities, and you cannot do either one because each depends on you having done the other one first”.

It is a condition also come to be known as a vicious cycle, where the circumstance is also construed to entail that both possibilities of choice also imply there are negative ramifications for you within them. It is a no-win senseless absurdity of a mind saying “I’m damned if I do, and damned if I don’t.”

Why an absurdity? Because God tells us “there hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.” (1 Corinthians 10:13)

To escape the absurdity, it still remains that you have to stand against the temptation and it is still you that has to find the way of escape. You cannot do so burying your head in mental aberrations birthed on Fantasy Island and that is exactly where Catch 22 was born for mental midgets and spiritual half breeds of all descriptions.

 

q20Now, here is your King of Catch 22 singing his version of ‘no way out’.   Elvis Presley Suspicious Minds HD Official Vídeo

Listen carefully because he was truly trapped, seeing no way out and how he ended his life proved it.  By the time of death “Elvis was in terrible health. His weight was estimated at 350 pounds and he was virtually non-functional at the end, being mostly bed-ridden and requiring permanent nursing care.”

 

q21Think carefully about this delusional Catch 22 mindset, for you do not want to end up impersonating Elvis in any manner and unnecessarily going to a messy and perhaps early death.

Messy? Yep! But we shall try to help you escape this through looking at the stupidity of the Catch 22 Mindset that Canadians are using in approaching the solution to the problems our nation faces because of Islam.

Step one is to unclouded the mind. With vision clear it is easy to see that Step Two is the immediate spreading of a blanket legal prosecution for all Muslims and Islamists in general due to their participation in Citizenship Treason within Canada.

The legal actions to be taken are being delineated, documented and assigned appropriate Charter statutes for leveling of charges through the RCMP in mid year. They will be presented to you along with petitions regarding the same upon completion.

q22Now, he’s been dead a long time, so give a final wave goodbye to fatty and let’s see if we can help you remain in the land of the living, eh?

The base of Catch 22 is absolute fantasy grown to be accepted by many as their reality.

The idea was germinated within a satirical novel by Joseph Heller called Catch-22. It was a humorous satire about WWII pilots looking for a loophole in government regulations so they would not have to go on bombing missions. You might equate it to Trudeau looking for some government loophole that will allow the Liberals not to have to charge Maryam Monsef for her fraud in attaining Canadian citizenship and subsequent steps in gaining electoral status as Member of our Parliament. https://youtu.be/8t7GHrgFCgg

In Catch-22 it is military law that anyone judged to be insane is allowed to be ejected from the army on ‘honorary-leave’. However, as shown in the Catch-22 scene, if the pilot asks to be ejected claiming in some manner he is insane and unfit to go on bombing missions, then he is essentially showing a personal concern for his own safety as well, and thus he must not be insane if he can express such concern. Why? Because you would only be insane if you were not concerned about your personal safety going on bombing missions.  This ensured that all the Catch-22 pilots could not get out of the military on charges of insanity, even if they were legitimate charges and they were truly insane.

So, Catch-22 germinated ideas that situations existed in which it was hopeless for you even to try get out of, that there were situations you should not enter into ever because the cards are completely stacked against you. And, this attitude has permeated our collective mentality to the degree that it is considered futile to challenge government in its insane decisions. That it is futile to stand against the insanity of Islam and such things as charges of Islamophobia which are essentially a creation of Islamists for their own ends.

So, we now have a generational mindset that to large degree has become embedded through our society being progressively exposed to irrational logic both within and outside government. Anyone dealing with our modern bureaucratic organizations should understand the bureaucratic logic of Catch-22. Particularly when it comes to the government we have elected and the legal system we allowed to be ensconced.

And through our educational system the principle of Catch-22 and its imprint on the psyche is further engrained. In high school or college, students are told to participate in forms of Student Government. This is supposed to be a form of practicing self-government and germinating democracy through allowing them to decide democratically whatever they perceive as being just. But this is bogus for their decisions only have any validity so long as the principal or dean of students approves of them. For many this bogus democracy is perhaps a citizen’s first encounter with organizations that may profess ‘open and libertarian values’, while in fact they are closed and hierarchical systems. Thus, the cloud of Catch-22 projects itself as being the organizational assumption, the unwritten law of informal power that exempts the organization from responsibility and accountability, while placing the participating individuals in the absurd position of being only token and show piece decision makers. The democratic process is thus made to look foul and fouled it has become in many ways, with the Catch-22 mentality in reality emerging as supreme. The genuine citizen and civil libertarian is left with the mental condition of “I will ultimately have to deal with negative results for myself no matter what choice I make.” This mental state places one in stress that has been likened to the Cornelian dilemma. In classical drama, a Cornelian dilemma is one in which someone is obliged to choose between two courses of action either of which will have a detrimental effect on themselves or on someone near to them. They experience intense inner conflict through trying to choose between such things as love or honor, natural inclinations or duty and self preservation or moral obligation.

Many individuals and a nation we are experiencing these inner conflicts now surrounding our Canadian Armed Forces. I exemplified this in MY FINAL RUN and THE CANADIAN MILITARY  posted on September 2, 2016  Then in PERISCOPES DOWN BOYS  posted on March 10, 2016 it was shown to what depths we have sunk through this Catch-22 mentality enveloping our nation. Why have we allowed a fictional mindset to condition us to where we allowed these events to occur?

q23There are many factors, but I am heading you toward a Hobson’s Choice surrounding our military and the Citizenship Treason that is shown within it due to both homosexuality and Islam.

A Hobson’s Choice is basically a situation of one choice only…a take it or leave it circumstance.  But, a Hobson’s choice is still a free choice in which one thing only appears to be offered. Because a person may refuse to accept what is offered, there are two options of taking it or taking nothing. In other words, one may “take it or leave it.” The phrase is said to have originated with Thomas Hobson (1544–1631), a livery stable owner in Cambridge, England, who offered rental customers the choice of either taking the horse in his stall nearest the door or taking none at all. This effectively allowed him to control the rotation of his animals and ensure they did not get run down by customers freely selecting the better-looking ones.

 q24So, what is a Hobson’s Choice now facing you? One is that the ‘good name’ of the Canadian Military and Prison Chaplains has become a deceptive blackened branding of Islam and playground for spiritual perverts. For our CANADIAN MILITARY IS WEARING ISIS SYMBOL  as I posted on August 31, 2015

You can stand against this or you can walk away leaving Islam to further invade our military and government. Take it or leave it, but in reaching your decision do not accept the defeatist Merriam-Webster definition of catch22 being a difficult situation for which there is no easy or possible solution.

You certainly are in a Hobson’s Choice, but you are not in a Catch-22, for there is both a possible and easy solution to the problem. The solution is within the very nature of the elemental cause of the problem itself and laws already existing in Canada enacted to end it.

Do not think you are in a position of some free choice delusion, nor in a choice dilemma between two undesirable options. One of your options is totally desirable, and that is to remove the shame our soldiers have to face and the further invasion of Islam in our land.

However, you may be a semblance of a false dilemma where only two choices are considered, when in fact there are others. But, in our case we come right back to Hobson’s Choice for all other considerations other than the two are simply stalling shadows of the Catch-22 mentality. And this mentality will result in not taking direct legal actions against Islam that will see blood flow in our streets.

q25Complications and immensities of an issue are made to appear insurmountable by the Catch-22 mentality.

Faced with the challenges of a problem, ideas are generated that it is impossible to locate the correct starting point to deal with the issue at hand. Tension is often created through feeling there simply is not sufficient time for all matters to be prepared properly so victory can be attained. Particularly in dealing with Government and Courts, many individuals feel that no matter how hard they strive they will never be fully prepared at mandatory presentation dates. These attitudes do genuinely make a mountain out of a molehill, but we have in many cases generated a set of inherently illogical rules or conditions that reinforce the Catch-22 mindset.

q26When you come to such a rules juncture in seeking justice do not fall victim to the Urban Dictionary Catch-22 definition: in which a desired outcome or solution is impossible to attain because of an illogical, unreasonable, or senseless situation created by measures or policies whose effect is often the polar opposite of what was intended. Within our nation there truly are contradictory rules that must be overcome, but in engaging the process of overcoming there always remains a simple solution. You may not always like the solution, but it is there. Keep it all simple and consume your elephant of opposition one mouth full at a time. Do not start at the rectum, start at the trunk on which it feeds and in short order the animal will die of its own accord.

Interfering with religious practices?

To claim someone is interfering with religious practices in a negative manner by restricting Islam is lunacy of immense proportions. The traditional basis for invalidating laws that prohibit the exercise of an obligatory religious practice is that it confronts the adherents with a Hobson’s choice between observance of their faith and adherence to the law. In curtailing Islam through protection of Canadian law, you certainly do not place the Muslim in a Hobson’s Choice for you cannot adhere to Islam in Canada if you have not first violated its Law. Our laws actually demand the prohibition of the practice of Islam for a multitude of reasons.

In Canada, when it comes to your protection of religious and cultural practices that save believers from facing hard choices, you are actually in violation of the law through standing for Islam. Religious and cultural practices are to be protected only when they are central to human identity and hence to human dignity, which is in turn central to equality. The multitude of violations of Human dignity and Human equality by Islam are exactly why all Islamists are wide open to prosecution and eviction from Canada and why you are facing a Hobson’s Choice in bringing them to prosecution at this time.

Do you still feel like you are missing the key to solution of the crisis of Islam? Are you still trying to open doors that you have closed? It is you that left the key behind the door, the key you still believe you now need to open the door so you can get back into the room for your perceived solutions to Islam. And, in that room you believe is your peace, your security and your safety of mind.

In frustration, you mutter “damn it, this is one big Catch 22.”  Not so fool.  Check the backdoor and windows of your mind for it is you that forgot the key to begin with. What else have you mistakenly assumed secure as you strutted out the door? What did you arrogantly and nobly assume you were correct about before the reality of ISIS and Islam went click upon you worldwide? Why does the Hobson’s Choice now facing you seemingly darken the forlorn cloud of Catch-22 birthed on your Fantasy Island?  There is no need for any of this in enacting the solution to Islam in Canada, as a God given window has been left wide open for you in our existing legal enactments.

The solution to dealing correctly with Islamists and ending the problems they embody always has been within the very nature of the problem itself and laws already existing in Canada.

“If any man has ears to hear, let him hear.”       Mark 4:23

 

q27Do we have a Catch-22 situation?

Not in the world of reality. It is simply a matter of picking up the first shovel full of Canadian law surrounding Citizenship Fraud and tossing it into the rat holes Islam crawled in through initially. It is simply a matter of Canada being the first nation to justifiably enforce its existing laws and become a Muslim free zone. And, I believe that amid the nations of this earth only Canada currently has an established set of laws that makes such action possible. This circumstance, whether you like it or not, is ultimately the only way you end the terrorist threats and Muslim foment from our ‘sea to shining sea’.

For certain, the Federal government should require new immigrants to take an oath of loyalty to Canada and its values, deporting them if they breach it. For certain the Federal government should ensure the Provinces and all other levels of government come into full compliance with the law surrounding such an oath of loyalty. The leadership of any level of government that fails to ensure such compliance should be fully prosecutable under Canadian laws surrounding treason, fined and jailed for a mandatory period of time.

All immigrants must take an oath swearing that they will give their complete allegiance and loyalty to Canada. Too much emphasis has been placed on the rights of newcomers rather than on their obligations to be citizens of Canada. As such, there are also changes necessary for Canada’s official multiculturalism policy. The laxness of the policy effectively encourages immigrants to place the ‘loyalties and enmities’ of their homelands before their duty to Canada. These have been strong contributing factors in encouraging sectarian Muslims to treat our country as a convenient and generous platform from which to engage in their personal feuds here, or to mount support for their favorite conflicts abroad.

 Canadian politicians and all ‘groupies’: procrastinate any further and you do so to your own peril.

(1) While they are sectarian “all faithful Muslims fundamentally agree on one basic precept in the Qur’an; that is, jihad or holy war against the infidel. Many millions of Muslims, both Sunni and Shiite, however, disagree on how to violently wage jihad. That is, whether to seize power politically by population density as it was done in the UK in order to get sharia law imposed, or to kill, bomb, and terrorize the infidel into submission. However, once sharia law is declared legal in any form by a democratic regime, Islam assumes its inexorably fascist form and is can only be stopped by that democratic host regime abolishing the law and holding Muslim’s accountable for their crimes against natural law, liberty and freedom of religion.”

(2) Outward appearances are deceitful for “Millions of seemingly peaceful and loving Muslims regularly go to their Mosques to worship their Islamic god and to earnestly pray that all infidels will eventually be forced to submit to Islam. In their scheduled meetings, these Muslims plan ways to make this happen, either violently or by subtle political subterfuge. It is wise to remember that all devout Muslims who render the Qur’an as the divine word of their god, Allah, have been commanded by their prophet, Mohammed, to lie, cheat, and deceive the infidel, by behaving in ways that Allah has forbidden them to do with other Muslims. Thus, they may do such things as drinking alcohol, eating pork and other foods they regard as unclean, as well as cheating and lying. The end result of the infidels’ submission to Allah, justifies any, and all means used to make that end result occur. This makes negotiating with Islam and compromising with it in any manner a truly suicidal social affair.” Thus, there is a required closure of all Islamic gathering centers and mandate against any public gatherings of Islamists.

(3) Canadian Immigration policy is in too many ways a farce, one that is simply promoting increasing Islamic unrest and destruction to our society. It is a farce, just as the statement that Islam is the fastest growing religion in Canada is a farce being stated as if this was somehow by Canadian acceptance through conversions. Islam is not foremost growing by conversion but through immigration. Muslims don’t actually convert many non-Muslim people, unless they put a knife to their throat. The Muslims grow within any host nation through immigration and by spawning as many babies as they can.

Consider this analogy. Essentially every baby aborted in Canada is replaced by a Muslim immigrant on an almost one to one basis. Every year in Canada, there are approximately 330,000 live births and the abortion rate in Canada is 30% of live births. This makes thus roughly 99,000 abortions by our home-grown Canadians. There are approximately 210,000 immigrants each year into Canada. At the time of these findings Muslims were believed to be the second largest supplier of immigrants to Canada. If abortion was banned and Canadian families had just one more kid, we would not need any immigrants coming into Canada at all to keep the economy afloat. And, it is keeping the economy afloat through all the so called valuable immigrants being brought in that is the justification for the irrational immigration policies.  If Canada would ban abortion and increase incentives for families to have an additional child it would totally eliminate the pretense that immigrants were an economic necessity to spur on the economy.

However, you may wish to look at this, the fact remains that all immigration by Muslims into Canada must be terminated.

(4) It is already past the time that all potential immigrants were made to understand it is their responsibility and not the governments that they comprehend what are core Canadian values. This must take place before they are ever considered worthy of even seeking immigrant status in any form.  In the initial transition to Canada as a Muslim Free Zone, clear notice of the expectation must be given that one and all must earnestly strive to live up to Canadian values, not Islamic values. And if any immigrant violates our laws in any manner they shall be quickly ejected from Canada in the direction they came from. Cultural differences of no kind can be acceptable as an excuse for leniency or a second chance.

There is not much I just raised that was not conjectured prior to March 01, 2006 when former senior Foreign Affairs official Martin Collacott released a Fraser Institute report stressing ‘radical Islamic terrorists are currently the greatest danger to Canada’s security.’ The Collacott advice and warnings were given 11 years ago, from this March of 2017.

And this same catch-phrase statement that ‘radical Islamic terrorists are currently the greatest danger to Canada’s security’ emerged loudly again through Stephen Blaney, our Minister of Public Safety Canada from July 15, 2013 to November 4, 2015. It was during such time we were further thrust into the Canadian Islamic Identity Crisis that had been germinating: The wearing of the niqab was disallowed for Canadian citizenship candidates in 2011 when reciting the Oath of Citizenship. This action taken by then Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney sparked confused people to debates and allowed duplicitous actions by sharia driven interest groups to advance their cause. This is dealt with in detail in Section Four: Female Oppression Under Islam.

Since the days mentioned the Islamic terrorist threats to Canada have only worsened. While it is always nice to know how you got into a mess, such knowledge is of little value if it does not show you how to get out of the mess.

q28In the scene from the movie The Matrix,  https://youtu.be/gDadfh0ZdBM  Lawrence Fishburne (Morpheus) gives Keanu Reeves (Neo) a Hobson’s choice, a chance to learn the truth or reject it. If Keanu takes the “red pill,” he gets to see the truth of how the world really works, or in the words of Fishburne, “you see how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

If Keanu takes the “blue pill,” he wakes up and life goes on as normal, and he remembers nothing of what happened. However, on the Fantasy Island of the millennial mentality, being ‘Red Pilled’ is claimed to be necessary to cure a state of mind enveloping someone who revels in their own ignorance.

However, fur ball, being ‘Red Pilled’ is the definition of a state of mind that simply makes your Cloud of Catch-22 brain waves set like super dried dog dung. You daily swallow the medias Catch-22 Red Pills in your endless search for Truth amid seemingly social chaos. And your gobbling and regurgitating what you are fed remains nothing more than ongoing evidence of your desperate need to remain lodged in your own ignorant opinions. You hunt for what you want to believe, in desperate need to hide from Truth.

Both your ignorant opinions and hackles are probably rising to the fore once again, as I doubt your mental capability to comprehend the reality of either Hobson’s Choice or Catch-22 as I referred to them.

All of it is fantasy: Catch-22 and the Red Pill cures. But the biggest fantasy is denial that Islam is not Hate Propaganda issuing from Qur’an, hadith and mosques. Islam simply is Hate Propaganda.

Learning about and accepting the hard truths of life is many times an ugly, scary thing when the Truth is polar opposite to your point of view. It is normal not to want to deal with the discomfort that following truth may eventually demand through actions required by its standards. But we have been given free will by God. And, even if you do not believe in God, you believe that in a democracy you somehow have the freedom of choice to decide for yourself what truth is and to act upon it. So, if you make an asinine decision resulting in negative social actions that make you look like a fool, remember you have done so through your own free will.

Do not carry on giving answers for your wrong opinions, or continue making  excuses for your heinous actions and face up to the fact that events are dictating you change the path you are on.  No matter how painful it may be, the life of Canada can only further disintegrate if you do not accept the truth and act upon it. “As my Lord has spoken: And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32) There is genuine freedom in coming to truly know yourself and progressively changing what shows itself as blatantly wrong.

Our leaders must quit playing a game of “Let’s Stop the Terrorists” and get serious by going straight to the heart of the matter. The war on terror is a religious matter that necessitates stopping Islam. Whether comfortable or not, terrorism will only end in Canada within the manners I ascribe.

You can fully trust Muslims to be Muslims as they continue systematically lying and killing their way to world domination. 1400 years of your fears and such Islamic activity is enough. It is time to end it.     Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner – YouTube    ▶ 44:50

The Days of Fear are over. But the systematic lying as a religious policy of Islam is a deadly deception, and if our politicians and religious leaders do not understand this many thousands of people will die in our streets and country side.

This completes documentation given as The Qur’an Is Hate Propaganda – Sector One: Citizenship Treason 

 ______

At this point you need to watch the VIRAL VIDEO: “The Truth About Justin Trudeau …  and give heed to the knowledge you should have analyzed prior to electing a very dangerous man.

The video raises concerns about Trudeau’s associations with various Islamic groups and individuals in Canada; his recitation of the Muslim convert’s “shahada” prayer during a visit to a particular mosque; and much more. We’ll let the video speak for itself and let you make up your own minds about it!

I will continue to share with you all salient issues in the manner called to. And now I ask you to watch these two videos:  > Canada Defiance Part 1mysticgatekeeper10,157 views       > Canada Defiance Part 2mysticgatekeeper1,887 views

Send Justin Trudeau the message that he does not represent you anymore and demand that he resigns from the office of Prime Minister. Include in you demand that all Muslim MP’s resign as well, for there is no place for Islam in the Canadian government.

The safety and well-being of Canada and its citizens must be the first priority of the federal government, not the advance of Trudeau’s Islamic invasion.

Thank you.

Phinehas

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s