Admonition: “For he whom God hath sent speaks the words of God: for God gives not the Spirit by measure unto him. The Father loves the Son, and hath given all things into his hand. He that believes on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believesnot the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abides on him.” (John 3:34-36)

It is best you familiarize yourself with Canadian Law. For many of you 2018 shall present the last opportunity to avoid eternal wrath; and your pathway of escape shall only be through seeing to correct application of Canadian hate/bias crime laws effecting your personal choices of existence.

While opinion is rampant on both sides of the hate/bias crimes fence, ultimately it shall be existing legislation and laws that will determine your future in Canada be you Christian or heathen. Opinions are of little value in an arena that ultimately demands the weaponry of fact, for while opinions are often “the beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing”; the Oxford dictionary states them to be “a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.” Pro or Con you need to be factually correct about hate/bias crime and cannot continue to swim in a cultural sea of ‘weasel opinions’.

So, what do we consider weasel opinions? Whether pro or con they are unsupported opinions often prefaced by such claims as… some people say, many scholars state, it is believed/regarded, many are of the opinion, most feel, experts declare, it is often reported, it is widely thought, research has shown, science says, it is often said … and blah, blah, blah.

Most persons automatically assume that referencing the OPP Hate/Bias Crimes statistics is more reliable than going to Wikipedia, but why do we assume this? “Weasel words are words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that something specific and meaningful has been said, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim has been communicated. A common form of weasel wording is through vague attribution, where a statement is dressed with authority, yet has no substantial basis. Phrases such as those above present the appearance of support for statements but can deny the reader the opportunity to assess the source of the viewpoint. They may disguise a biased view. Claims about what people say, think, feel, or believe, and what has been shown, demonstrated, or proved should be clearly attributed.”

Weasel opinions seep in through both OPP and Wiki sources that are affecting their results and it is an individual responsibility for all to distance themselves from whatever might be weasel opinion. For myself this is a simple process as whatever contradicts the written Word of God in the King James Bible is weasel opinion no matter how it is disguised.

Now, I consider the following to be factual and I will ultimately prove it so through the arena of hate/bias crimes I am dragging you into. It is fact there are special treatments given Gender-based crimes when considered as hate crime; and there are special treatments given perceived hate crimes toward Islamic based interest groups. These special status factors are clearly violating the Canadian hate propaganda legislation and laws as currently exist and are being deliberately manipulated by persons of ill cultural intents. And thus, the blah, blah war of weasel opinion wages onward about hate propaganda legislation.

In general, the arguments against existing hate propaganda legislation are centered around perceived threats to an individuals’ human rights and freedoms of expression. Some alarmists believe that it is too difficult to draw the lines of such legal restrictions, that once started down such pathway a societal crash is unavoidable through manipulations by special interest groups.

Once enacted, hate propaganda legislation may be abused and used against those to whom it was not originally intended to apply, but this does lessen the need for such legal parameters in our society. What has to be equally applied are the monitoring and legal checks against such abuses.

There was a time the purveyors of hate propaganda were only of marginal importance and generalized legislative measures appeared sufficient, but this is no longer so with the impact they now have on the body politic. Strengthened laws are probably needed to deal with them for society is being further divided as groups apply to have their critics silenced through charges of hate/bias crimes.  But, to hesitate prosecuting hate propagandists because it enables them to use the courtroom as the medium to further disseminate their ideas is sheer stupidity. And even more moronic is the psycho-drivel that claims the non-penalized distribution of hate propaganda has a cathartic or safety valve effect on our society.

However, what appears perhaps saner opposition to some hate crime laws states them in conflict with rights of free speech, because it selectively criminalized bias-motivated speech or symbolic speech for disfavored topics while permitting such speech for other topics. Some go so far as to assert that it conflicts with our more fundamental right of free thought. This is particularly evidenced when such fundamental Christian religious beliefs as surrounding sexuality are being classified as illegal.

Support for hate crime laws and many of the arguments in favor of hate propaganda legislation appear too generalized, such as “numerous reports and legislative enactments indicate a consensus as to the legitimacy of using the law against hate propaganda.” Or, “many other Western liberal democracies have anti-hate propaganda legislation.” And, “Canada must fulfill its international obligations by enacting hate propaganda legislation. The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, to all of which Canada is a signatory, oblige Canada to combat racism and the advocacy of genocide and racial superiority.” Such appeals have their elements of truth, but it is the reality of laws on the books and their evidence of application that pictures our present reality.

In advancing their causes the Pro Side makes repeated claims of justification due to claims of egalitarian legislation imbued in sections 15 and 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  This same Charter is claimed as basis for stating that Canada is a multicultural society and that this multiculturalism is accepted as a basic constitutional norm. We shall examine this Charter for the same article sources also state: “Rights are never absolute – in Canada they are exercised under law – legal intervention is justified in some circumstances.” Yes, legal intervention is justified in many circumstances! But, if not all citizens have an absolute right to the legislated Rights and Freedoms then Canada is in dire straits and must stop wandering about in the delusion that it somehow occupies a special legal cultural empowerment beneficial to every citizen and other nations should emulate.

This term empowerment can be duplicitous, often leading to acceptance of measures designed by self-interest groups to increase their own autonomy, self-determination and ability to act on their own authority. Such is the case in the Islamic thrust for sharia and Rainbow Coalition advance of all queer agendas.

The term empowerment is stated to originate from American psychology as if this somehow makes the claimed actions of empowerment truly beneficial.  Empowerment as action refers both to the process of self-empowerment and to the professional support of people by government and other agencies. This is supposed to enable them to overcome their sense of powerlessness and lack of influence in the society in general. This is supposed to be for the ultimate good of all, and people dependent upon tax dollars for their living push this idea as being a practical approach of resource-oriented intervention. This empowerment is supposedly good way to expend your tax dollars. And, an even more grandiose claim for such empowerment is that it is the best educational tool to increase the responsibility of the truly democratic, egalitarian, multi-cultural Canadian citizen. This claim is self-serving special interest group crap.

Such crap is proving disastrously true in the animatic mental aberrations called politics manifesting through Justin Trudeau. His watch continues to employ tactics ensuring that Blood Shall Flow In Canada as posted on February 11, 2018.  See to their removal from the Canadian public landscape as quickly as possible as our nation needs true healing.

 It is a righteous action with God that this take place.


Galatians 4:16    Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.