LOYALTY TO A NON-MUSLIM GOVERNMENT – NOT PERMISSIBLE
As was seen through the Islamic notion of hudna, Muslims do not feel themselves bound to respect any pact which they might sign with non-Muslims, and they will break such agreements as soon as they feel it is to their advantage to do so. And they are certain they will ultimately gain advantage for An-Nisa 4:141 tells them “never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way to triumphs over the believers.”
Loyalty to a non-Muslim government simply is not possible for followers of Islam. If Muslims claim they are loyal to the non-Muslim countries in which they live it is in spite of Islamic teachings and they are apostate to Islam. Unlike other faiths, Islam is not just a religion but a political system as well. Their State is to be inseparable from Islamic religious rule. Islamic law, or Sharia, is claimed complete and not designed to coexist with or be subordinate to any other legal system. So once again: Wake Up Kaffir Canada!
The Muslims you embrace are truly vultures in chicken feathers and not the birds you think have flown into your coop. For, genuine loyalty to Canada and its core values simply is not possible for adherents to the Qur’an.
Now, to sort out the chickens that should be allowed to strut around the Canadian barnyard is not an impossible task, and it truly is one that must be addressed in timely fashion by our government. In our ‘ball game’ of Canadian national security I will give you three examples why all Muslims have struck out and why they should be returned to the ‘dugouts’ they straggled in from.
One: Muslims are not to show honor or loyalty to Canada by standing for our national anthem. If unable to avoid such action they are commanded to act in a duplicitous manner as Fatwas # 85728 and others indicate. “So, it is unlawful to stand up for such a thing and Muslims should make sure that anything they do conforms with these rules. Blind imitation of disbelievers is rejected. It is reported from Abu Dawood that the Prophet said: “Whoever imitates some people, he is one of them.” So, the Muslim should not commit this Haram unless there is dire necessity like fearing to be jailed or beaten. In this case, he may make believe that he is standing for the anthem but keeps on remembering Allah and should feel deep sorrow for doing such a thing. Indeed, standing for these flags and anthems is a glorification of them. And if the person intends by such act any glorification of these things similar to glorifying Allah, then he becomes a Kafir, and moves away from Islamic religion. Allah knows best.”
It does not matter whether it is in spiritual, civil or social matters, the Qur’an is very clear that Muslims are to resist unbelievers by any means until Islam establishes political supremacy. They are not to follow the ways of the democratic society nor be tricked into doing so.
Al-Maida 5:49: “So judge between them by that which Allah hath revealed, and follow not their desires, but beware of them lest they seduce thee from some part of that which Allah hath revealed unto thee”
Muslim loyalty belongs to Allah’s Qur’an not to any government or its rituals of allegiance or obedience. A Muslim ‘citizen’ is in a position of divided loyalty if he in sincerity were to swear an oath of allegiance to our nation, or with a genuine heart to sing the National Anthem. He would in fact be accused of failing to submit to the theocracy of Allah, cast into the ranks of the hypocrites and defined as Muslim in name only. As a hypocrite and apostate, she can then be murdered.
Two: Muslims are not to obtain citizenship of a non-Muslim country, nor to make a pledge of allegiance to such country without dire necessity. Fatwas # 202420 is but one stating this, and again we see the command to act in a fraudulent manner so they can achieve their ends. “We have explained in them that in case of dire necessity, a Muslim who gives the pledge of allegiance to one of these governments may conceal his intention and use Tawriyah by saying something which has more than one meaning and intending a meaning different from what the listener is likely to understand, like to intend his allegiance only to the Muslims in those lands and to benefit that country by guiding its people to enter Islam. However, the Muslim does not become a disbeliever by merely repeating these words which contain allegiance to the people of Kufr, as long as his heart remains at rest with faith.” Khiyar al-tarwiyah literally means the option to consider, similar to the option given a buyer to rescind a contract of sale after some consideration. In our circumstance discussed the fatwas declares some means of how to enter the fraudulent agreement in safe Islamic manner.
Three: As a general rule the Muslim is forbidden to live among us because it can have many negative effects on his practice of Islam. As Fatwas # 82552 states “Living in a non-Muslim country or migration to it is permissible only if a person cannot find a Muslim country where he can earn a livelihood and can practice his religion freely. It is also permissible for Muslim scholars to live in non-Muslim countries for the purpose of Da’wah i.e., calling non-Muslims to Islam and teaching Muslims sharia rules, provided they can do so freely and would not be subjected to trials or would have to compromise or leave their religion.”
In the above are some details related to the rule of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries. But the rules for applying and accepting citizenship of those countries is much more restricted. A Muslim is not permitted to apply for citizenship of non-Muslim countries except in a dire need, such as not being able to practice his religion in his own country, in fear of or being in danger for his life, or facing the threat of imprisonment or torture in his homeland. As well, he must be unable to situate to an Islamic country where he can live. In such circumstances one can apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country. If he is obliged to take an oath for getting citizenship, at that moment of speaking he must be mentally alluding to a loyalty toward Islam in such manner as to be free of the stated allegiance to the host country.
However, if he is able to live harmlessly in the non-Muslim country without taking the citizenship oath then applying for citizenship is not permissible for him. It is also forbidden for him to apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country if he is simply aspiring to material comforts or financial gain.
It is quite clear that the Citizenship Oath or Oath of Allegiance is something the Muslim is to try to avoid, and if participating they are to do so from a fraudulent mindset. This is why you hear the Muslim whine about the matter of not wearing the niqab in ‘legal circumstances’.
But what is the worth of an oath of any kind from someone who practices deception because his ‘religion tells him to do so when it advances his agenda? Zero! Muslims owe their alliance to the umma, the Muslim community, and not to any kafir nation. Thus, the Muslim serves the umma before our country and deceives kafirs when it advances Islam. Believing that jihad in all of its forms is the true relationship between Muslims and kafirs, why would a Muslim defend Canada from an Islamic threat or protect the Canadian Constitution? The Bill of Rights offers all peoples freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Islamic Sharia law denies these same rights to any human. The apostate of Islam can be killed without redress and freedom of speech is specifically denied as both Mohammed and the Qur’an may not be criticized. The doctrine of Islam makes a Muslim’s oath meaningless when made to kafirs, and Canada is a kaffir nation. To all in Canada: If you are not a Muslim you are a kafir.
Summation: All Muslims are clearly commanded by their faith to enter a process of ‘naturalization fraud’ when they seek Citizenship of our nation. The case is closed and it is time to start enacting appropriate sentence for this duplicity. To do so you must be familiar with the Canadian Citizenship Act:
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29, Canadian citizenship can be lost for specific reasons listed in the statute. One such reason for loss is by Order in cases of fraud: 10. (1). Subject to section 18 but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, where the Governor in Council, on a report from the Minister, is satisfied that any person has obtained, retained, renounced or resumed citizenship under this Act by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances, (a) the person ceases to be a citizen, or (b) the renunciation of citizenship by the person shall be deemed to have had no effect, as of such date as may be fixed by order of the Governor in Council with respect thereto. Presumption: (2) A person shall be deemed to have obtained citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances if the person was lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances and, because of that admission, the person subsequently obtained citizenship. 1974-75-76, c. 108, s. 9.
Note: Knowingly concealing of the true Islamic position with respect to ‘citizenship application and oaths’ has been proven in this Series, thus all Muslims are eligible to have their citizenship status immediately revoked. And, belief in the radical Islamic ideology itself should be grounds enough to deport immigrants, even after they have been naturalized. People are not to support totalitarian groups or affiliate with any that engage in advocating violence or ideologies that overthrow Canadian governance. The Islamic communities clearly comprise totalitarian entities for under Islam it is impossible to separate their church and state.
“All civil authority bows to the wisdom of religious clerics in their theocracy. The best existing example (if one can use that descriptor loosely) of such a theocracy in action is the Islamic Republic of Iran. The worst example in recent memory is the Taliban when it ruled Afghanistan. Can one doubt that both examples point clearly to a totalitarian form of government in which no form of peaceful dissension or religious liberty is tolerated? In fact, dissension and religious differences are dealt with brutally.”
I believe necessary legislation or ‘order in council’ needs be enacted that bans anyone from becoming a Canadian citizen if he or she is a follower of Islam. This is but a necessary first step to ensure that Islam and sharia law can never supersede secular law and liberty in Canada. Further, the process must be started now of stripping all citizenship rights from Muslims for their failure to disclose their beliefs and true intents in the initial circumstance. As shown in the fatwas all practicing Muslims have been involved in naturalization fraud and their citizenship should be immediately rescinded or the laws of Canada continue onward as a bad joke. Immigration laws allowing Muslims into Canada should be immediately repealed for the protection of the Canadian public.
Denaturalized people usually revert to their prior immigration status, which is often as a permanent resident alien. Simply reverting to prior status is not sufficient for Muslims, for it still allows the perpetrators of deception and terrorism to wander our society at will. All resident aliens convicted of certain crimes, particularly national security crimes should be subject to immediate deportation.
But, even in the absence of a criminal conviction, permanent residents can be deported if they obtained that status through fraud or misrepresentation. It would seem quite clear that our Muslim miscreants should stand for deportation due to their fraudulent conduct. This cannot be a case by case, drawn out process but one of immediate enactment if those adhering to the Islamic faith do not renounce the commandments of the Qur’an that demands their pursuit of sharia law and the hate crimes perpetuated through their beliefs.
It does not matter what generation of Muslims you are dealing with for they have all lied during the naturalization process. As a group, they should be forced to, either, vocally renounce their belief in the practice of undemocratic Islamic law or have their citizenship immediately revoked. This would not infringe on their civil liberties or human rights as they have no Canadian entitlement to such given their initial fraudulent actions and faith-based convictions. As to taking such an oath of renunciation, it is probably best used along with some format of a polygraph process. In all this one has to remember they are dealing with ‘faith justified liars’, thus a blanket expulsion of all followers of Islam remains the most expedient for cleansing the Nation of their evil. The case against them is already 100% confirmed through their documented beliefs in Qu’ran and hadith.
It is a righteous action with God that this take place.
Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?