86             CHAOS

89                Political Hacks

91                Liberals – Justin Trudeau

94                Conservative – Andrew Scheer

97                    Glam Star – Party Hackette Kenzie Potter

98                    The Hack Hamish Marshall

103               Mandatory Check Time

104               Political Lunacy Through Scheer Negatives

105                  Yo Homey!

109                  Scheer Loser Reactions

111                  Name Calling – Media Attacks

115                  Posturing Piously

121                  The Full-Blown Conservative Rot 2016

126                  Is Scheer A Closet Racist?

129                  Will The Climate Change With Scheer?

131                  Migrants – Immigration

135                  Time Is Not Scheer’s Friend

137                   Scheered Off Conclusion

138              NDP – Jangatte Singh – “The Turbanator”

143              Green With Envy – Elizabeth May

147              The Lunatic Fringe

147                   Tim Moen – Libertarian Party of Canada

148                    Steven J Garvey – National Citizens Alliance

149               Travis Patron’s Wild Goose Chase

153               Bernier – Patron and Media Associates

154               Patron’s Use of Media Associates

154                   Council of European Canadians

156                   The Disappearing Cameron

157                   The Mr. Poutine NO-GO Show

159                   Hiding Out Heroically?

162                   In The CBC Enemy Camp?

164                   The Final Headshot

166                   In Sound and Print

171              Bernier and The Media

173                   Perhaps The CBC Can Simply Flee?

175              My Big Questions

176                   First Nations Concerns

177              Three Strikes To His Home Run

178                   One Good Woman

180                   One Bad Bitch

187                   One Refining Gem

189                   Always Correct?

190                   Condoning Anarchy – In The Company of Racists?

191              Conclusions About Mad Max

195               Playoff Standings of The Kids




The simple definition of chaos is given as ‘complete disorder and confusion’, but no State, society or individual life can disintegrate to such a ‘complete being’ spontaneously. There always has to be ‘incendiary events’ that lead to chaos. Sometimes these events appear seemingly evolutionary in that they convey the impression of a ‘natural patterned growth’, but such ‘insinuations’ are most often errant. Chaos requires the deliberate action or inaction on the part of States, societies or individuals to fully explode into awareness.

The journey from a ‘serene or equitable’ status to one of chaos, no matter the feet trudging it that one may be observing at any particular point, all have one recognizable feature in common. They all have the personal stench of mental fungal decay eating away at legitimate authority in some form or another.

There is no earthly existing Utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without some form of government being evidenced. You simply cannot have a complete absence of government without being in chaos. And government requires recognizable forms and abilities to implement authority in the lives of States, societies and individuals.

A highly visible sign of entering the arena of chaos is the state of anarchy. Anarchy is recognized as being a state of disorder due to the absence or the nonrecognition of authority. This state we have observed prevailing in many formats of ghettos worldwide or societies in dystopia like conditions.

Take note, the state of anarchy with its descent to absolute chaos due to lawlessness or political disorder, can be checked and corrected only through the actions or choices first made by individuals.

We know that France is in state of walking the pathway of anarchy in observing the Yellow Vests protests underway. Let us listen to an individual from amid the ‘common French citizens’ and see if we can garner anything that will keep Canada from further following France along the disastrous pathway to where they now are. December 5,2018 >

The reasons given for the Yellow Vest protest clearly shows that Canada is on the same pathway as France:

You can casually observe burnt out vehicles, looting and other scenes of destruction as we are told why. “In France the stated reasons are hypocrisy of an unfair tax system, manipulative environmental laws, the funding of large corporations, furthering mass immigration, the general corruption of the country, corrupt politicians in particular and to get together with other people who are angry for similar reasons.”

We observe the same conditions in Canada, but are yet to feel the full effects of the rising anarchy in the nation. What will be ‘the straw which breaks the camels back’? And who might be the individual’s intent upon dropping the final straw with incendiary actions attached to achieve the chaos they desire? Are we not already seeing graffiti, burning, hate crime killing and looting by ‘anarchists and people from the suburbs’ in minor ways across Canada? But when will that final straw be dropped that erupts to the chaos of large-scale blood flow in our streets?

As with France we Canadians have arrogance of leadership, new parties forming, taxes with the worst effects for the poor, the middle classes and the elderly. We also hear great French doubts that the leadership will change for the better and that they only respond when they are forced to. And, when reacting they do so in manners that only further exposes their incompetence as they have no genuine qualifications for office. These claims sound like government under the leadership of Justine Trudeau.

Before we depart from the ‘common man’ of the French Yellow Vest protests look at the variety of faces and laments in this CBC report of December 9,2018 >

In the Yellow Vest report of December 5th, we hear the claim about big-media coverage of the protesters, comparing them to small independent media sources.

‘Big-media coverage portrays them as ultra-right and destructive while small independents portray them as normal people. It is stated that most of the time the press is now afraid of protesters because many press personalities are being murdered and mugged’ as we see nowadays.

But the 9th report is by the big-media outlet of the CBC. Is this report a possible propaganda attempt to offset an increasing public concern over media in general? It is a fact that ‘normal thinking people’ are really fed up with the media and trust little of what comes through it. They see all media as being systematically employed to enact an information control that will leave them under domination of the State and globalist agendas.

The UN Global Compact is designed to implement total Control of Media: The UN Global Compact stipulates that, “media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants” should not receive “public funding or material support.”

Already, it is clear what this stipulation means in practice. The UN recently banned the Canadian outlet Rebel Media from attending the Conference for the Adoption of the UN Global Migration Compact. When Rebel Media asked for an explanation, they were told that the UN, “reserves the right to deny or withdraw accreditation of journalists from media organizations whose activities run counter to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, or who abuse the privileges so extended or put the accreditation to improper use or act in a way not consistent with the principles of the Organization. The decisions are final”.

This form of totalitarian behavior on the part of the UN should encourage more states that still value democracy to immediately back out of the Compact. But Canada ran right to the front of the line to sign on through Trudeau.

What does the ‘common Canadian’ think of this media Compact and migration issue?

December 7, 2018 – GIUSEPPE VALENTE commented: 

“This is the way Britain started out slowly but surely they infiltrate. Ha, slowly but surely, what am I saying, we have Muslim Immigration and foreign affairs ministers. We are at war, wake the hell up people. Post signs on bridges, better yet on public signs so it will take longer to take down. Inform your fellow citizens because the media is against us.

We are not asked to lay down our lives like children have in the past wars. So, show some courage and fight, fight, fight for your country, children and family.”

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” Hosea 4:6”

But, who will Giuseppe’s appeal reach in time to stop our further tumble into anarchy and chaos? Are there any among the political hacks of Ottawa that have enough ‘common sense’ left to listen? Have we already traveled so far that personages like Travis Patron can twist informational contexts to their advantage surrounding migration and the Global Compact?


Political Hacks

Not every Nation is blind, numbed or brain dead to reality. Yesterday, December 7, 2018 at 5:00 am Italy showed a ‘common sense approach’ to the migrants flooding the free nations of the earth. > Italy Adopts Hardline Immigration Law

“Italy will not sign the United Nations Global Compact for Migration, nor will Italian officials attend a conference in Marrakesh, Morocco, on December 10 and 11 to adopt the agreement. The Global Compact not only aims to establish migration as a human right, but also to outlaw criticism of migration through hate crimes legislation.

And, the Italian Parliament has approved a tough new immigration and security law that will make it easier to deport migrants who commit crimes and strip those convicted of terrorism of their Italian citizenship. Under the new law, the Italian government will only grant asylum to legitimate refugees of war or victims of political persecution. Asylum seekers may now lose their protection if they are convicted of crimes including: threat or violence to a public official; physical assault; female genital mutilation; and a variety of theft charges.”

Canada under Trudeau chooses to sign to the Compact in his ongoing efforts to usher us further into the political cauldron of anarchy and complete chaos he desires. He appears to be achieving some degree of success in moving us toward chaos, for we see the Yellow Vests protest pop up in Alberta on December 8, 2018. The protests were jointly against the provincial and federal carbon taxes, and Canada’s plan to endorse the United Nations’ migration pact. >

“Alberta yellow vest protests lack violence seen in Paris, but anti-immigration anger simmers.

The protest movement has now spread across the globe, but in Alberta, which may be Canada’s center of anti-carbon-tax discontent, the yellow vest protests Saturday were free from physical violence.

“We are Canadian, we’re not anywhere close to that kind of radical,” said Allison Prentice, who was clad in a yellow vest at the Calgary protest. “I’m proud to be here and represent people who care about Canadians first.”

The burning anger, which seemed to be lit by multiple fuses, still meant threats of violence were on the lips of attendees who linked frustration over economic woes caused by low oil prices to the country’s immigration policies — a sharp departure from the wide-ranging motivations of French protesters who appear to be primarily concerned with wealth inequality.

In Calgary, more than 200 protesters, some accompanied by dogs also decked out in yellow vests, chanted “No Trudeau. No Trudeau” outside of city hall. Some yelled “String him up,” others yelled “traitor.”

And, Allison Prentice is wrong for we already are “close to that kind of radical” as seen in Paris. There were multiple posts on Canada’s Yellow Jackets Facebook page calling for more drastic action, such as that written by Rob Kerr following. 

“Look at France today. After four weeks of burning the cities, the French government cut the carbon tax. So, what do we want? 90 years or four weeks until something changes. If you want to crush a government, you have to play their game … You want to see them jump? Then burn down City Hall.”

And, the same day antifa and others shows up at the anti- Compact Day Rally in Ottawa with something a little more “close to that kind of radical”. The first video gives the ‘speaking of facts and feelings’ expressed on the 8th >

The second video gives a more generalized view of the violence that erupted this day. Watch it as well Allison. Fights had already broken out before the ‘official start up protest time’. Wake up Allison for this level of ‘violence and sentiment expression’ has been taking place to an even greater level in Ontario ad Quebec for a number of years. >

It is only the recent UN Global Compact and carbon tax eruptions in France so closely linked to the Alberta economy that has brought you into the streets. I commend you for coming out at all, but wake up Allison.

You can find a good summation of the Global Compact enactment ‘threats’ at >

“The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration — which seeks to criminalize criticism of migration — is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, to normalize mass migration, to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and to bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot.

One thing about the agreement, in any event, is irrefutable: almost nobody in the Western world has been clamoring for this. It is, quite simply, a project of the globalist elites. It is a UN power-grab.

It is something else, too: it is an effort to enhance the clout of the UN’s largest and most influential power bloc — namely, the Arab and Muslim states. Briefly put, whatever this deal is or is not, it is definitely not good news for the West, for freedom, or for national identity and security.”

Political Hacks?

A Political hack is ……..a politician who belongs to a small clique that controls a political party for his private desires and ends, rather than what is in the best interest or desires as expressed by the public electorate as their requirements, ends and perceived needs.

The political hack resides at many different levels in a political party apparatus, but their intentions are always more aligned with victory than personal moral convictions. They can be so morally bankrupt that they become labeled even within their own ranks as “hired guns” and they are often simply employed in such manner.

It is obvious Canada is in the hands of political hacks and their International ‘handlers’.

A Party Hack is a member of a political party who is not particularly brilliant, but who can be relied upon for loyalty to the party and its leadership.

It is obvious Ottawa is full of party hacks and Gerald Butts, Trudeau’s senior adviser, who blasted all critics of Trudeau on Twitter as being alt-right Nazis is a prime example.

Well, I am not a politician, a political hack, a party hack nor a Global Compact International Handler speaking to you. So, listen carefully.

If we elect anyone other than Maxime Bernier as the next Prime Minister of Canada this nation shall descend further into anarchy and absolute chaos far more quickly than what you have seen erupt in Europe and on the streets of France. 



Why This Man Is Best as Our Next Prime Minister of Canada

His was the first voice of warning to rise up in the House of Commons against the specter of the UN Global Compact now facing us and his positions surrounding the curbing of big Government have been made quite clear. Any refinements necessary to more fully clarify ‘exactly how this man will precede’ when assuming office will be made public knowledge as he simply is not a ‘political hack’. Further, he has thus far done all possible as he has come forward to ensure that no ‘party hacks’ nor ‘racist white supremacists’ can embed themselves in his rank and file. As such he is the juxtaposition to Justin Trudeau and Travis Patron.

And morally, the man appears to tower above any of the other leadership candidates pushing themselves forward to the dais to seek our Prime Minister Office and director’s status for the Nation. 

It may be the poor Caliber of His Opposition more than anything else that recommends Maxime Bernier to deserve your vote in 2019. But Bernier is not simply the best out of a selection of bad choices available. Maxime Bernier is what Canadians used to simply describe with three small words as ‘a good man’, ‘a good neighbor’… ‘a true Canadian’. They never used to mutter any explanation for stating such sentiments. They simply knew it was true. Whatever fool may have wanted to argue was left alone to argue with himself.

I would not designate the man Saint Maxime but I certainly will be using him as comparison in many matters as I carry forward in the issue of Travis Patron that I have brought before you. It is unavoidable as Maxime Bernier is the man that is burning hotly in the minds of all political party hacks.


 Liberals – Justin Trudeau

Trudeau’s peoplekind, fancy socks, bhangra buddy Butts will have to continue to hack it up for his top Canadian economic oil ‘white-gloved’ moron. Our silver spoon snow boarding silly has nothing in common with the working man other than his occasional slip from rabid feminism into groping an unsuspecting journalist. > 4:20     >

For certain Trudeau and Bernier never went to the same ophthalmologist when acquiring a ‘gender lens’. Maxime Bernier says he has ‘no need’ to be a feminist because “I believe in people.”  > 16:40

Our rabid feminist leads a pack of unethical miscreants, and the closer you get to the center of the pack the more unethical they become. Three senior members of Justin Trudeau’s cabinet have been found in violation of ethics rules in the past year, and the list includes the prime minister himself. September 15,2018 >

The common theme of Liberal arrogance and a sense of entitlement that permeates Ottawa and Canadian politics in general seems an aroma the makes Bernier somewhat nauseous. Oh, Maxime is completely honest when he states that he “believes in humanity and men will always find new ways to answer the challenges that are coming in life”. He also knows that you cannot ‘legislate integrity’ and there needs to be more serious consequences than ‘naming and shaming’ political hacks who genuinely have no ability to be affected by such ‘shaming’. He thus appears to be fully prepared to flip the switch on the fan necessary to start blowing the stench of corruption out of the Nations capitol. This once again I believe justly entitles him as Mad Max.

“Trudeau insists Canada’s conflict laws are among the toughest in the world, and that he and his ministers always follow the conflict commissioner’s recommendations.” This is pure political crap and Bernier has nothing in common with the man. Pressed in the Power Lunch interview as to ‘common ground with Trudeau’ he stated they were both involved in sports. Other than that, a straight forward: No! That about sums it up in most ways for Mad Maxime Bernier is largely a moral and political juxtaposition to Justin Trudeau. That in and of itself entitles him to your support does it not?

The laws surrounding enforcement of ethical rules governing politicians are in a shamble and as Conflict of Interest commissioner Mario Dion has pointed out in The Canadian Press “he doesn’t have the legislative authority to recommend anything, and that the Trudeau government has shown no inclination to change the law.” Hang in there Mario as Bernier is about to ‘flick the switch’ according to Canadian popularity polls. 

Justin Trudeau’s long-time friend, college colleague and chief political hack Gerald Butts is about to be butted out. “Butts is widely acknowledged as the architect of Trudeau’s leadership win and of the party’s convincing electoral victory subsequent. At the first meeting of the Liberal caucus after the election, Trudeau made Butts’ role crystal clear. He told his MPs and cabinet ministers that when Butts speaks to them, he is speaking for Trudeau.”

Get rid of the hack and you get rid of Trudeau. Could Trudeau make it alone without Butts? Butts was there when Justin Trudeau wrote his famous eulogy to Pierre. They were in each other’s wedding parties. Butts fingerprints are evident on a range of Trudeau policies, from Senate reform and marijuana legalization to the Northern Gateway pipeline.

Can Trudeau even fathom being alone to face the criminal prosecution that is moving in his direction? As Trudeau has stated about his handler: “Trudeau looked at his friend squarely. “Gerry,” he replied, “won’t let that happen.”

Do not be as dumb as you appear Baby-T. When they prosecute Butts to the fullest extent of the law for his ‘ethical violations’ as applicable under the Criminal Code of Canada as brought down through the Magna Carta you will find him no longer around. You will be alone and unable to even don your checkered socks as your ‘twisted cult of diversity destroying the nation’ comes to a grinding halt.


Conservatives – Andrew Scheer

“Hi mom and dad. I should make it home by supper time tonight.”

“Don’t fret Andy. We love to wait up and keep your supper in the warmer. Remember, peanut butter cookies tonight.”

“Aw, shucks! And, traffic is congested! But I guess I better hang around for Question Period unless I can get Kenzie to cover for me. Aw, shucks!”

As Max has stated, in many ways Scheer ‘is a good guy and a family man’. But Scheer is also leading a Conservative Party that Max has clearly qualified. “I have come to realize over the past year that this party is too intellectually and morally corrupt to be reformed,” he said. This is a fact and like other matters surrounding Andrew ‘Peter Principle’ Scheer must be taken into full account.

The Canadian birthed ‘Peter Principle’ of organizational structure is that members of a hierarchy are promoted until they reach and remain at the level at which they are no longer competent.

Usually taken facetiously or satirical, it should not be as it is a highly visible phenomena on the Canadian political-economic and spiritual landscapes. It is a primary reason that truly competent leadership is in scarcity and in such high demand. It is also a primary reason that we see truly competent and skilled leadership too often simply ‘retiring’ in disgust or some form of ‘burn-out’ from their generally hard worked for and once coveted positions. 

Highly skilled people can enter an organization and rise through promotion to their own ultimate level of incompetence. In all sectors of our society we find job vacancies continually arise and need to be filled. The criteria for promotion from within is usually successful performance in current and previous posts. For a variety of reasons at some point individuals are promoted to posts which are simply beyond the range of their abilities. From this point their job performance is characterized by incompetence and their promotions will cease. This has a continuing negative effect in that Individuals are now permanently planted in positions which they cannot adequately perform. Thus, has arisen the generalized principle statement that ‘every employee tends to move to their level of incompetence’ in corporate structures.

Over time as ‘each additional post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent’ we find the entire organizational performance will virtually always become increasingly dysfunctional through performing at sub-optimum levels.

Every large organization will contain a number of people in this situation, but the visibly prospering structures have not been overtaken by them. But, eventually, if the Peter Principle is not checked and plays itself out, all major positions in an organization could be held by individuals who are incapable of fulfilling their roles.

This does not always happen but it has become a too frequent occurrence. And the frequency exacerbates to the degree at which the organizational structure is already permeated by the Peter Principle. Why? Because the people who select them to move onward are too often already at their own highest level of complete incompetence.

But, a great number of people enter corporations with zeal for success and genuine concern for healthy corporate welfare which they view as demanding polished, conscientious work skills be performed adequately. But, particularly within Government corporate structures it has only acerbated our perceived declines. Groups with genuine ‘work ethics’ see the functioning of their own unit as a priority and thus cleanse themselves for such by what is described as the tendency to “kick employees upstairs”. The professional term for such action is Percussive Sublimation: This is a method by which a group rids itself of individuals hampering more productive workers by recommending them, voting for them and assisting them through promotion to management positions. This leaves the group under effective leadership of the ‘go getter they desire’, but the process is a viscous cycle as the ‘management fungal rot’ continues to rise in the overall body corporate. 

People may also be justifiably promoted until they enter a job that they are truly no good at, and there they will stay forever. That is, unless the ‘volcanic sewage’ that originally allowed them to rise has built pressures to the degree that it continues to explosively thrust them upward. Such is the case for too many people within recognized party ranks. They may at one time have had aptitudes or proven skills for the roles they were considered for and which moved them onward. But such aptitudes and skills are not applicable to where they are now ensconced.

Good performance in one job sector does not guarantee similar performance in another supposedly somehow parallel and equally as important a sector. Thus, within the political arena we see the continual shuffling of ‘cabinet cronies’ in desperate bids to find the original talent positioning from which they may have at some time been birthed. 

This must be brought to an end.

Do you think this Peter Principle is only theoretic? I wish it were. Workers will keep getting promotions and extra responsibilities till they can’t adequately perform their tasks anymore, both in and outside of Government. And you can study the Psychology that has arisen around the phenomena until you reach your own ‘level of highest personal incompetence’ should you desire. You can get on your way through the following entering points if you desire: Wage Compression, Turnover, Voluntary Turnover, Barthel Index, Participative Decision-Making (Pdm), Union, Outplacement Counseling, Organizational Effectiveness, Valence-Instrumentality-Expectancy Theory or Street Intelligence.

The list is endless and just another reason why we constantly see another ‘Parliamentary Committee’ being struck.

What I have been stating are observable facts, not simply a part of some ‘satirical theory’. And, from this basis I unequivocally state it is Scheer Lunacy to remain within the current Conservative Party ranks if you truly believe in traditional Conservative Values.

To understand where the “Conservatives” are now and why in such need of reform you need a bit of Wiki-Info about The Canadian Alliance Party (The Reform Party of Canada)

The Reform Party of Canada (FrenchParti réformiste du Canada) was a right-wing populist federal political party in Canada that existed from 1987 to 2000. Reform was founded as a Western Canada -based protest movement and eventually became a populist conservative party, with strong social conservative elements. It was initially motivated by the perceived need for democratic reforms and by profound Western Canadian discontent with the Progressive Conservative (PC) federal government of Prime Minister Brian ‘Looney’ Mulroney.

Led by its founder Preston Manning, Reform rapidly gained momentum in western Canada, and successfully supplanted the PCs as the largest party in Western Canada after the 1993 election. In opposition, the party advocated for spending restraint and democratic reform. In the leadup to the 1997 election, the party attempted to make a national breakthrough and replace the ailing PCs. However, a Liberal victory and disappointment with the lack of Eastern seats led many members to question the future direction of the party.

The party was directly succeeded by the Canadian Alliance in 2000, which merged with the Progressive Conservative Party in 2003 to form the modern-day Conservative Party of Canada.

Maxime Bernier has a strong base among Conservative men knowing the necessity of reform of the amalgamated conservatives. Men such as George Richardson, former Canadian Alliance Party president, and Adam Richardson the former Canadian Alliance candidate and staffer openly backed his policies. 49% of Conservatives did back Bernier at the time of his leadership race with PP Scheer and still do. Given the passage of time and events the 51% are in likelihood coming to realization now of the error of supporting Scheer. But as Bernier has stated, he is not soliciting them but will let his policies and groundswell of support let them determine their course of actions now. Pride will cause some to commit ‘political suicide’, but pride always rises before a fall. All the true Conservative can hope for is that they can keep the projected need for ‘body bags’ low. As Mad Max stated, this Scheer Conservative Party is “too intellectually and morally corrupt.” Here is his full speech in Calgary on Why a new Conservative Based party is necessary. >


Glam Star Party Hackette Kenzie Potter was named Principal Secretary to Scheer in June of 2017. This is an important and influential position in relationship to the Prime Ministers Office.

I do not know what truly qualified her for any position when she found her way into the Political Scene. But I do know what she rapidly evolved to and the following report pretty much sums it up.

“The ‘social lives’ of many in the Conservative party took a nosedive when Speaker Andrew Scheer hired Tory glam staffer Kenzie Potter as his chief of staff. The Speaker’s office is non-partisan, which means Potter can no longer be ‘head of the Conservatives social committee’, where she previously organized events like their Halloween party and the Tories’ five-year anniversary bash at Ottawa’s Hard Rock Cafe”-

“One of Potter’s previous jobs included working for Jay Hill when he was government whip and House leader; that’s where she mastered her parliamentary procedure. –

Potter’s big challenge will be the annual Speaker’s BBQ for MPs and the media held at the Farm at Kingsmere, his official residence. Under the Previous Speaker, Peter Milliken, the centerpiece was always a huge leg of beef. Asked why he never switched the food up, Milliken said he would have been happy to try different things but he left the food choices to his staff. There seems to have been a communication problem; his staff countered that that was the menu Milliken always liked, so they never dared change it.”

So, this is the wonderful world of the evolutionary Political Patricia Principled Kenzie Potter. A few months past I made visitation to the Regina offices of our ‘glam queen’ and off somewhere Blushing Scheer. The woman did not even have the common sense to employ a breast pump to ensure her own infant daughter could be fed when she was closeted with ‘visiting favor seeking Conservative hacks’ of one form or another. It was hilarious watching the ‘phone lady receptionist at the front desk with the big boobs and low-cut top panic as ‘Rosie’ repeatedly tried to pull down her top to get a drink. This continued until I finally left the office chuckling to myself as you never know how long party hacks and patronage pukes will stay closeted. I didn’t really consider Principle Secretary Glam Pot quite worth the wait.

However, it is not so hilarious watching such people as Potter trying to further ensconce themselves in Ottawa to the detriment of one and all.  Political hacks, party hacks and ‘hired guns’ are flocking about PP Scheer. It is not that Potter is not astute at making arrangements But, the work performance of Kenzie Potter reeks of what the Bible references as “the work of an imperious politically whorish woman”.

I would hope that in the midst of all the ‘jiggling and juggling’ of Andy’s affairs she might somehow teach Rosie enough common sense to pack a breast pump when heading to the office.

One of Andrew Sheer’s shallow vows was that “he would always fight for and protect the rights of parents as first educators to their children.” When the chips are down, he will never keep it and you shall know such life results personally. Glam Queen I believe that “every one that uses proverbs shall use this proverb against thee, saying, as is the mother, so is her daughter.” (Ezekiel 16:44) This is truly a crying shame as Rosie certainly was one ‘cute looking kid’. But then so was the cute Kid from Redvers and take a look at him now.


The Hack Hamish Marshall –   This man has definitely been elevated to the upper echelon of current CCP Hacks. He was hired from amid Scheer’s stated media bad guys, those sources Scheer needed to deem unfit to be spoken to and thus ensure ‘composure in his own camp”. Hamish is a former Rebel under Ezra Levant and a true ‘hired gun’ for Scheer appointed him the 2019 Conservative campaign chairman. >

 It is good that Ezra no longer has an employee of such caliber for it lowers the level of the ‘Peter Principle People’ that are evidenced in Ezra’s own ranks. 

This Hamish certainly casts an image similar to his current master, both physically and morally. Neither one is worth the powder to blow their hypocritical hides to hell. On second thought, they both have earned the right to the powder through their own actions and most certainly they will find a way to pad their tax payer expense accounts to pay for the explosions. 

“The man the federal Conservatives have hired to run their next election campaign comes with baggage that Scheer himself now wants to avoid — a connection to media outlet The Rebel. 

If most Canadians know Marshall’s name at all, it’s probably because of that Rebel link. Like most campaign managers, the bespectacled and baby-faced Marshall stayed behind the scenes during Scheer’s leadership race.”

But the desk he stayed behind for most of the race was located in Rebel offices. I wonder if he was billing Scheer for his office provision and reimbursing Ezra for the cost? Ask Ezra, it was his space. Also, ask Ezra if he was pushing Marshall toward ‘sheer conservative assistance’ for his own business ends and ongoing battle with the CBC. After all, Marshall is a ‘hired gun’ that will fire in whatever direction the cash rattles.


“In August 2018, as growing controversy swirled around The Rebel’s coverage of neo-Nazis and white nationalists in Charlottesville, Va., Scheer began to face questions about Marshall’s role as a director of Rebel Media Ltd. and Scheer’s own willingness to grant interviews to the outlet. This was at the time when the Faith Goudy Girl was caught with her verbal pants somewhat down in making what sounded like white supremacist comments doing a Rebel interview, which ultimately led to her firing. Always looking for ‘political footage’ and another inch up in lapping from the bowl of ‘public popularity’ Scheer hastily jumped to the opportunity of rebuking the Rebel as somehow endorsing white supremacism and himself a champion against such. He must have been on a phone call to mom and dad, or perhaps 4 of his five kids were screaming at the same time distracting him for he plumb forgot that his leadership campaign manager was/had been an employee of the Rebel at the same time they were partnering up together. So, the fool fired off his mouth canon and effectively shot himself in the foot.

Scheer is dishonest and he periodically exposes himself as such in statements that go back a long way.

But, back to PP Scheer himself.

“So as long as the editorial direction of that particular institution remains as it is … I won’t be granting those types of interviews,” Scheer told reporters in mid-August, insisting that he wanted to focus on providing a positive vision that would bring Canadians together. And it’s precisely that tension that could prove a challenge for Scheer. Marshall helped him run a positivity-themed campaign during the leadership, focusing largely on party unity.”

These two birds certainly have party unity and will remain so united until one seriously threatens the ‘cash flow’ of the other in some manner. Marshall was a duplicitous thief while working for the Rebel and Scheer just cannot help padding his accounts as his days with good old mom and day in Ottawa have shown.

The other hacks around them prove little better and no more intelligent.

“He’s not involved with The Rebel,” said Cory Hann.

But Marshall was involved and his main involvement speaks for itself. Back in 2015, Marshall told the National Observer, “I am not involved at all in the content production and editorial side of things. My involvement is on the business side.”

And, in an article, Marshall told Maclean’s that he was “in the process” of severing ties with The Rebel, though he didn’t provide a precise date for his departure, citing “some business issues that need to be resolved.”

Here, the key word in Marshall’s dictionary is “business”, and this remains the business of making Marshall money. And the most money comes in ‘propaganda content production’ in the world Marshall dwells in.

During the leadership race, Scheer and Marshall teamed up to run a campaign based on keeping the party united and amid their series of targeted pitches the ‘Scheer – Marshall – Rebel glitch’ occasioned. There was an attempt at the time to show Scheer as being prepared to save the tax payer money through removing federal grant funding from universities that did not champion free speech in his stated manner of doing so. And, lo and behold they were even able to hold our boy Travis Patron up as one of the extreme examples of white supremacism that they said could not deter them. It all would sound quite good politically press wise if they had not been caught in the ‘hired gun hack a doodle do-do mess’ of Rebel media employment of Marshall they had been placed in.

Scheer, the championing of ‘free speech’ sates: “No one likes when debate gets stifled, when these events get cancelled, whether it’s a former president or prime minister of Israel, whether it’s a discussion on a panel.”

“The foundation of our democracy is the ability to have a debate about any subject,” Scheer said at the time.

“That is why I am so committed to defending free speech. I will withhold federal funding from universities that shut down debate and can’t stand different points of view.”

The man is a hypocrite and totally incapable of debating the truth spoken by Maxime Bernier surrounding the immoral bipartisan corruption he represents. When confronted with it on August 23,2018 all he could do was screech out some standard party hack appeals designed for his own safety and defence…..‘he’s gonna split the vote, he is a sore loser, he just wants his own ends’…Was this Scheer or Marshall speaking as Maxime Bernier is certainly the greatest threat they face to continuance of padding their expense accounts. 

Whatever. Marshall describes himself online as “a strategist, pollster and demographic expert who tells stories with numbers.” Another bio puts it more succinctly: “Hamish helps clients win.” And, it doesn’t matter about the client, the paycheck is the reason he helps them win. He did not leave the Rebel over ‘purist conservatist ideals’, in fact we know he did work on Scheer’s leadership campaign from Rebel offices.

“The issue re-emerged this week when a Globe and Mail reporter asked Scheer whether he was aware that Marshall had worked out of The Rebel offices during Scheer’s leadership run.

“I didn’t ask Hamish about every client he had,” said Scheer, before ending the media availability session.”

Scheer is good at refusing interview if he knows he will have to face questions that show him for what he truly is.

Whether he hires an Aussie hack, or Canadian hack it is all the same with Scheer in any strategy session about winning the federal race in 2019.

Cory Hann notes that Marshall “has shown he thrives in underdog campaigns.” Well, the money hungry little puke should really thrive in this one. He possibly will be able to collect cash from multiple clients. For certain Scheer will see Marshall gets every bag he can carry in Scheer’s desperate bid to even save his own money-grubbing expense padding ass.

Scheer got caught in his ‘public purse theft’ through issues that were raised about discrepancies in his expense claims through an interview away back in 2010. The Huffington Post – Canada was sniffing around and they found that in an interview with CPAC in 2010, host Catherine Clark had asked Scheer where he lives when he stays in Ottawa.

“I sleep in the same bed I slept in when I was in high school and elementary school. I stay with Mum and Dad,” Scheer said, laughing and blushing. “Sometimes,” he said, “his parents wait up for him.”

“It’s funny. I like it,” he told Clark, who agreed that the scenario sounded lovely.

“It’s great on a lot of levels,” Scheer added. “It saves the taxpayers money, because I’m staying with Mom and Dad, not at hotels…. I’m living off my parents,” he said, laughing.

Except Scheer wasn’t saving the taxpayers money according to Huffington Post – Canada findings.

“During the time period discussed in the interview, Scheer claimed close to the limit MP’s are allowed for accommodation and per diem expenses. (The cap in 2010 was $25,850 and is currently $30,000).

In 2009-2010, he claimed $23,231 in MP accommodation and per diems.

In 2010-2011, he expended $19,310.44 for accommodation, meals and incidental expenses incurred while travel status in Ottawa.

When HuffPost approached Scheer’s office about the expense claims, his chief of staff, Kenzie Potter, said Scheer happened to be staying at his parents “a fair bit” around that time but that he was also staying in hotels.”

Was it between arranging table settings and preparing menu options for the next get together at tax payer expense our ‘breast pumpless glam queen’ rose to the rescue?

2016/12/06/ > Andrew Scheer’s Office Says He Exaggerated his 2010 Story About…

“Conservative leadership candidate Andrew Scheer exaggerated a cute story of sleeping at his parents’ home while working in Ottawa, his office said Monday after The Huffington Post – Canada raised questions about potential discrepancies in his expense claims.”

 “I think he was just adding color to the story about having curfew. His parents house was, and still is a bit of a home base for him,” she wrote in an email. “It was more just a cute story he was telling her.”

Not quite ‘cute enough’ to hide the truth of the documentation Glam Queen. Scheer was raiding the public purse then and is just as fraudulent in his self-serving activities now.

In the House of Commons on January 31st, 2018 he rose to state: “Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister forced a minister to pay back more than $3,000 for inappropriate expenses. He forced his chief of staff and his principal secretary to pay back more than $64,000 for inappropriate moving expenses. Before he became prime minister, he himself had to pay back nearly $1,000 in expenses.

When will the Prime Minister follow his own rules and give Canadians back the $200,000 that he charged them for his illegal trips?”

PP Scheer, the record shows you to be a lying hypocritical bastard in launching accusations for crimes which you are guilty of yourself. And, being you are a hypocrite is part of why you so greatly feared Maxime Bernier’s demand for policy changes.

The ludicrousness of Scheer in his desperation of Bernier coming after him policy wise is best summed up in this Rebel presentation of August 24,2018 > But it was notable, Ezra blames both Scheer and Bernier as both being much smaller as true conservative leaders for their respective roles.

But Ezra, in fashioning yourself as the ‘champion of true conservatism and media purity’ we must remind you this is what Scheer was paying Marshall the Rebel Media Mutt for at the time. >  He was busy taking care of such business to ensure his paycheck. This propaganda production was ready for posting immediately after the Mad Max announcement. Hamish must have been in extreme haste preparing it.  But perhaps his associated Australian hired guns were shooting with both barrels at the same time.

Scheer could never fulfill the necessary requirement of anyone to be considered capable of the great leadership Canada now needs. Such leadership is evidenced in the ability of being able to Stand Alone in the face of all opposition when it comes to providing people with what is genuinely needed for their well being. Jesus Christ was the greatest exponent of this quality that has ever walked on the face of this earth.

Maxime Bernier has emulated him to a high degree in how and why he chose to leave the Conservative Party. I pray he is not crucified for doing so by the confused Canadian Political body tweeting their ‘bird brains’ on August 23 >

But, as events have transpired it does not look like his political blood will be shed from coast to coast, it looks like the haemorrhage will be that of his opponents.  Unfortunately, Hamish cannot be hired to ensure they bleed to death as it does not appear Bernier believes in employing straight forward political hacks.

When asked what he hoped to achieve, Mad Max responded “I hope we could have the balance of power, that would be great.”

I think the very poor caliber of his opposition ensures he shall reform a government in which he has much more than the balance of power. And this will be in spite of all the political and party hacks snuggled somewhere in the not so hallowed halls of Ottawa.




How will you be identified if the international chaos entering upon us comes to full blossom in Canada? How will the policing authorities know that you are one they should be protecting or one they should be battering when the combatants can no longer be kept separated and one or another must be terminated? How will you know which persons in the milling mob about you perceive you as friend or foe? What sign or emblem will be upon you showing you are united in a common cause?

The French Government made it easy for people of a ‘common cause to identify in their stand against them’, generally speaking, when they mandated that all citizens were required to carry yellow vests in their vehicles for ‘emergency’ conditions they might face on the road.  Unless one was completely a public transport personage there was nothing that one had to look for, to create as common emblem or to be faced with an additional expense for. They were already prepared to ‘identify’ and enter into the fray. Vehicles and vests were the ‘common element’ and they were mandated by Government.

Here in Canada many companies use colored safety vests to designate distinct colors for certain jobs. For example, the red color is Fire Truck Red which is an intense bright red commonly seen on fire trucks and emergency vehicles while the Navy-Blue color is a dark/deep blue which is great for jobs that may get messy. But there is no vest mandated nor singular color of vest mandated as necessary by law to be in any and/or all vehicles.

Instead, what we have mandated in Canada is the cause of the ‘chaos’ seen in France. We have mandated Big-Government interference in all aspects of our lives. Consider some of our mandated vehicle requirements: New vehicles must be equipped with anti-theft engine immobilizers, car insurance for everyone, vehicle safety inspections, vehicle back up cameras, seat belts on buses, packaging-labeling of goods carried, medical reporting requirements, entry level training for vehicle related employment, employer compliance training, electric light locations, transport of human and animal flesh, electronic logging devices, disability support requirements, drug and alcohol disorder compliance:  This is but a small part of it.

Mad Max Bernier of the Peoples Party of Canada resonates with messages about change of policies and doing politics differently. There are many policy issues dividing our country and threatening our prosperity right now surrounding pipelines, equalization, immigration, corporate welfare, the Paris Agreement, healthcare, foreign aid, the UN Global Compact, the UN Migrant Agenda and suffocating supply management. Big Government has mandated its own control in all these areas and Max Bernier is 100% correct that it must be reduced in size and move toward being a cost-efficient corruption free organization.

Not to do so will end in a Canadian chaos that will dwarf France in its magnitude. And none of you will have clear cut identification when it does explode of ‘which persons in the milling mob about you are perceiving you as friend or foe’? At that point full panic will hit and ‘your greatest fear will come upon you’. That is the point of personal descent into an absolute chaos from which most people never emerge with personalities not irreparably psychologically damaged.

This is what Trudeau’s desired mandate for you has evolved to and Conservatives under Scheer have been ‘mandated’ right into his program with him.

You cannot remain one of Sheer’s anthropoids and see any true Conservative values emerge following the 2019 election. It is time to jump off whatever fence you may be mulling the future from and boot Trudeau out of Parliament Hill and toward jail now.

When you do so make certain you allocate time to ensure white supremacists and neo-Nazi fascists like Travis Patron are entangled in his coat-tails.

Your only safety from the descending chaos is to clearly identify yourself through publicly taking your stance now.



To Pander or Not to Pander

Scheer basically branded himself a ‘political pimp’ and liar at the time of the leadership race.

From interview – ‘In a leadership race dominated by a celebrity candidate who plays to crowds and some polarizing either-or positions on identity politics, Andrew Scheer sells himself as Mr. Compromise — the candidate who can unite Tories on the right and on the left.’

“I call myself a full-spectrum Conservative,” says Scheer. “I think the leader should always try to find common ground between all the different kinds of Conservatives.”

“He says the many MP’s who have endorsed him see him as a team player who’s not going to impose his own ideology on the caucus.”

But Scheer is now clearly under endorsement of ‘full-spectrum Conservative’ pandering to special interest groups in both Church and state.

And Bernier is now under endorsement of having basically branded himself an equal opportunity ‘hard nose’.

In interview Bernier “When asked what he would do to earn the votes of diverse Canadians, said he’d do nothing.

“I won’t do anything for the Muslim community, I won’t do anything for the Christian community, I won’t do anything for the Jewish community,” Bernier said.

“For me, you are a Canadian and I’m working for all Canadians.

“I don’t try to pander to every special ethnicity or special interest group.”

 I guess Canada and conservatives in particular need to face up to their need for cosmetic surgery and just what style and color of nose they truly prefer.

But, returning to our ‘cash handy Andy’, just where is there a completely honest dividing line drawn in the shifting sands of this man’s life? He assumed his office as Official Leader of the Opposition on May 27, 2017 at a salary of $255,000.00 Canadian which should have been enough incentive to keep him from more stealing through expense accounts and perks. But old habits are hard to break when your character has already been molded. You can dig through the ‘sanitized’ Andrew Scheer of Wikipedia but it does not shine the light of reality upon this hacks political life.


 YO HOMEY! Who took the cookie from the cookie jar? >

Whether dining in public or at home this political grunt truly feels entitlement to his pork barrel rights. He plays every card in his deck of opportunity to ensure that he does not get squeezed out of the ‘public trough’ through bipartisan antics of any other Ottawa piglet.

The man is shameless in how he deploys ‘family’ to attempt popularity gain to ascend or remain within the political image he desires. Scheer in no manner created this political facade but he certainly mastered the techniques of doing so.  He continuously uses family to try and garner belief that he is the model for the ordinary Canadian citizen and best for their representation.

Last year Andrew Scheer’s stated ideas of a magical Christmas did not ‘envision breaks involving billionaires or private islands’ like that of Justin Trudeau. “Instead, he is preparing to head home to Regina with his wife Jill and five kids, to sit in his pajamas with them until noon every day watching old movies like Home Alone 2, with its brief Donald Trump cameo.”

But last December 21, 2017 he made certain his photo-op with wife Jill was ready for press publication. And this ‘May Mother’s Day’ of 2018 pump all you can from ‘the well’ of public family imagery was given the global view. > But Scheer ultimately man’s all his pumps due to ‘political designs’ and not truly embedded family ideals. Even pumping out another kid with his ‘soul mate breeder Jill’ is geared toward what fits in with his political aspirations. When questioned as to the ages of their five children and why there was a two-year gap between the first four and then a five-year gap till the fifth one aged two, she stated: ‘we had one per election, the gap was because of the ‘majority government’ and they then had one again with the election’. A pleasant and obviously prolific breeder I wonder if dear Jill had to vibrate with sexual desires as not so ‘unhandy Andy’ was intently cementing his political goals during normal nocturnal family hours?

Well, as Homey Jill smiles sweetly -“All of those things take a little bit of time and a little bit of an adjustment,” she said, adding that ‘she hasn’t spent much time thinking about how their life might shift yet again if the Conservatives win the federal election in 2019.’

Fear not Jill, your boy will not head up a conservative government following October 21, 2019 and you should soon be getting a bit more seriously intimate attention from Andy.

He won’t just be making you more publicly visible than ever before, as he has done during the past several months, with you attending numerous events alongside him and hosting your first solo event on Parliament Hill to raise awareness of the worldwide bone marrow registry. All was for his needed attention seeking in the public eye. On April 27, 2018 radio host Geoff Currier spoke a lot of reality surrounding your boy Jill. > > Where’s Waldo — I mean, Andrew Scheer? Quite flatly he states Andrew is ‘missing in action’.

You see Jill, polls have shown your ‘pajama clad prince’ remains a mystery to nearly three in four Canadians. One opinion poll suggested those people who did know him felt him to be “intelligent” and “principled” but not “tough” or “interesting.”

Does he need to get tougher and more interesting Jill? Perhaps the conservative reform truly needed comes first within your own home? But as you have stated there has never existed such circumstance as this and no one to turn to for advice in raising children in this ‘media cultured world’. But Jill, after all is said and done, a tightly scheduled breeding pattern due to political frameworks does not seem quite normal to the ‘common Canadian’ nor ‘traditional Canadian values’.

But don’t fear too prolonged a sexual abstinence in the cause of the ‘greater political good of Absent Andy.”  With Christmas time fast approaching and all the children about the tree, the state of ‘political tension’ might ease just enough that ‘commoner’ Andrew recalls that Santa Claus only has to come popping down the chimney once a year. Being the ‘family man’ he is and with your ‘five occupied with their goodies’ he may then just hustle you off for a ‘little bone marrow registry of your very, very own’. But, then he may not, he may simply lead you off to another prearranged photo-op of overlooking a menu where the bulbs are popping. And, if it all leaves you overheated, you and ‘buster blush’ can cool off together shoveling snow in the driveway in the clothes you were dining in. Somehow, I don’t think the frolicsome five will come rushing out to help you with their new gleaming snow shovels.

Are the ‘delayed again sleigh bells’ ringing in your ears Jill? Are you even capable of listening, or has it all truly become a ‘winter I wonder when land’ around the house? It seems like you potentially could be facing the ‘full course enactment of standardized political sexual realities’ this Christmas in your ‘homey land Jill’. But you will be able to answer that question for us after Christmas day Jill. This is also my hoped for date of Chapter Six publication, but if I miss it, for certain it will not have the emotional results that the ‘political parade of events’ is having in your life.

If Santa didn’t come sliding down the flue for you and somehow flew your nesting coop this season, there is truly no reason to panic in fear that you must somehow await next year and even as long as October 21, 2019. Your boy Andy has proven himself a standard political turkey many times over. As we move toward that election date and the political tensions increase, your boy will be bombarded with the fact he simply cannot hack his way out of the mess he has hacked his way into.

But, be careful Jill, as you are ‘manageress of homey land and your desired Randy Andy may just come staggering home with peanut butter cookies on his breath, a glazed look in his eyes and visions of his shadow ministers disappearing in his cloudy mind. He may simply be overcome and normalcy of human physical sexual tension release take hold, with you ending up opening your Christmas box left wrapped so tightly this December.

I say be careful Jill, as your boy will find a way to blame you for destroying an otherwise perfect political breeding pattern if the stork should flap its wings. If this occurs and along comes number eight because of such a common display of ‘tension release bone marrow transplant’ you might want to look around the ‘homey base’ Jill. Search for the breast pump the Glam Queen thoughtlessly left behind after she came for your advice on the way to the office.

You people are a misaligned, misinformed, politically correct and derelict, media bred and wed political lump that truly does not know who you are and should never hold yourselves up as in any way normal for a pattern of leadership in our ‘homey lands’ nor in our Parliament.

Having said such, I guess my disgust with your mate’s conservatism and moral qualifications are becoming more apparent as I move along. I thought there was a ray of hope for Andrew at the start of 2018 when he kicked Senator Lynn Beyak from caucus for promoting the idea that indigenous Canadians are lazy. But this was just more PP Scheer posturing for position in the political Media urinal. He was only trying to somehow not be known as the ‘invisible man’ or be seen for what he truly is. Such urine did not cease, but we heard the shower increase with ludicrous claims by Andrew, Marshall or some other party hack.

Who did author these words from his mouth? “I think we’ve demonstrated that our front bench is a lot stronger than the Liberal front bench. We’ve got shadow ministers who could walk into the job tomorrow morning and that’s important. Canadians have to believe that not just myself, but the entire Conservative team is credible, competent and ready to govern, and is a good start to the year of 2018.”

“Credible, competent and ready to govern” are only illusionary propaganda shadows emitting from a spineless politically opportunist pup that ultimately will never survive the ‘chaotic political dog fight’ projecting itself upon the Canadian landscape.

Take your missing in action soul mate in hand Jill and provide him with the only ‘politically appropriate excuse’ he needs for a complete and absolute retreat from a fight he neither wants and evidence shows he knows he cannot win.

I never said Andrew was not a cleaver lad. Just that he is a deceiving, thieving corrupted self-serving man unfit to lead in Government. But as Geoff Currier said “Even Muhammad Ali knew that you can’t play rope a dope for 15 rounds. Sooner or later you have to come out and box.”

Well, your dope is hanging on the ropes Jill and he simply cannot ‘come out and box’ as events surrounding Mad Max Bernier have shown.

Give your blushing boy the politically acceptable excuse of ‘complete retirement from political office due to the personal needs of ‘family’. Pack him up, take your ‘politically generated brood’ and go back to Saskatchewan. Make certain that ‘mommy and the peanut butter cookies gang’ remain in Ottawa where they belong.

It must have been a combination of his pediatric nurse Momma Mary Scheer and newspaper librarian, Ottawa RC Archdiocese deacon father James that raised him to be the obvious moral mess he is today. I find it hard to believe that he could have possibly come to such standards on his own. But, then again his standards may also have been greatly impacted through being sandwiched between his sisters Catherine and Anne Marie in ‘Ottawa peanut butter cookie battles’.

I guess it does not really matter now, except you are being left holding his ‘empty bag of cookies. It is you that must brush the crumbs from his lips and try to raise him to no longer be the whining lad when he sees his bag is empty and rapidly disappearing. You are after all, the one supposedly in charge of ‘Yo Homey Land’.

Is not this part of the ‘supporting role’ you stated yourself to possess, claiming it as your right through marriage and a union that only death could part?

Give him the ‘political excuse of family need’ for absolute retreat. Everyone knows it is a lie. But it is standard acceptable procedure in the world of the man who wed and bred the prairie girl. Andrew will always ultimately position himself as a hack, so proceed carefully in the photo-ops that then follow Jill.

Take him aside somewhere Jill, remind him that this is a man’s world > and exactly where he will be without you. But, when you do it might be helpful to have some ‘peanut butter cookies’ at hand.


Face the facts Conservatives, Scheer has always been a political opportunist, he has proven to be a man of calculating self-advancement within your party ranks; but now his calculations are so misaligned with true conservatism that all he does portrays a man in throes of political desperation.

It has been stated “the biggest political blunder of the year, the one with real staying power is the Conservative party’s decision to choose Andrew Scheer as its leader.

With each passing day, it’s becoming clearer that Canada’s Official Opposition is led by a man who might have what it takes to rock a high school model Parliament, but little else. In federal politics, Scheer is a catastrophe — a gift to Trudeau and the Liberal Party of Canada and the most hapless and inept major party leader since Stéphane Dion vanished from the scene.”

The man making the statement, Alan Freeman, is just another spiritual moral moron on the Canadian media stage, but these words are true.

Scheer is a disaster and at the first indicators of being blocked in his political desires he runs for solace, displaying standard hack packaging.

Like a baby slopping tears and blowing snot bubbles from his nose, such was his reaction to the demand for change by Maxime Bernier at full exodus from the Canadian Conservative Party.

Peter Principle Scheer certainly was jumping around making himself an easy man to mock.

And, by the time he removed Maxime Bernier from his shadow cabinet Hamish certainly was dancing in the shadow trying to paint Bernier as the demon of the Conservative Party. Given Maxime’s known policy that would greatly remove corporate patronage funding from the CBC they were happy to comply. June 12,2018 – CBC>  Scheer removes Maxime Bernier from Tory front bench | CBC…   When you read it you will see it is replete with nothing but personal attacks on the man’s character.

This is more propaganda of ‘Snot Bubbles bursting’ on the scene of Bernier character assassination. > ctvnews  > Conservatives’ reaction typical of losers, Maxime Bernier says |…

Ludicrous statements and immensity of his opposition did not faze Mad Max. He simply branded the Conservatives reactions to his progressive claims for reform as what they were, the standard reactions of typical losers.

“Newly independent MP Maxime Bernier says the personal attacks on his character by his former Conservative colleagues are typical of losers.

In an interview with Evan Solomon, host of CTV’s Question Period, to be aired at 2:30 p.m. EST on Bell Media stations, Bernier says the party knows most conservatives agree with him.

“They know that and they don’t have the courage to do these reforms. They don’t have the courage to speak about that. And they cannot fight me on real issues,” Bernier said on the Evan Solomon Show.

“Now they’re going to personal attacks. It’s typical of a loser. The losers are doing that. They don’t want to have real debate.”

Scheer’s crew did not want to approach full debate of the relevant issues then and they still do not now.

Going from front bench, to back bench to his own bench has been repeatedly clarified as a process of continued efforts to get rational reform considerations into a Conservative party leadership that had gone 51% morally deaf.

The biggest whine out of Hamish Land came out of Scheer Snot Bubbles as “He’s going to split the vote”. 

Split the vote? Mad Max already had 49% of open Conservative support and daily results show the 51% are waking up rapidly to the fact that no one should be slipping their hand into the cookie jar if conservatism is to survive in Canada and chaos to be avoided.

Where will Bernier first find Scheer blowing more Snot Bubbles in 2019 as his own PPC bench continues to full conservative reform capacity?

Full capacity should not be very long as the most natural thing with Scheer has become to make a mockery of himself and the genuine conservative values lacking in his actions.

Hopefully we shall see a trail of snot bubbles emitting from the old mini-van he mockingly asked Trudeau to repair as he drives himself permanently back to Saskatchewan. That shall be a good day for Conservatism in Canada when Senor Snot Bubbles evaporates over the Political horizon.

Like I said, Andrew Scheer has made himself an easy man to mock.



The words of a wise man’s mouth are gracious; but the lips of a fool will swallow up himself. The beginning of the words of his mouth is foolishness: and the end of his talk is mischievous madness. (Ecclesiastes 10:12-13)

Sticks and Stones

These are some of the names Andrew Scheer has brought upon himself: ‘Snot Bubbles Scheer, Senor Snot Bubbles, Mr. Compromise, Aw Shucks Scheer, Bozo Scheer, Bozo, Mr. Crap Yap, Bozo Junior, Mr. Blush, Red Nose, Peter Principle Scheer, Unhandy Andy, Harper with a smile, Chuckles, the Cookie Monster, Seagull Scheer, Harper lite, Harper with a smile, Randy Andy, King of Blunders, the Yapper, Grave Digger, Buster Blush and Leader of the Cons.  Unfortunately, in the run-up to the 2019 election the list will likely increase.

Trudeau probably has garnered more ‘negative monikers’ due to the deliberate political evil propelling his actions, but ‘Unhandy Andy’ appears to be the ‘King of Blunders’ in both name calling and media attacks that are such a large part of the political media scene.

When he entered the game of “Dueling Half-Wits” on the House of Commons floor he tried all kinds of ugly name attachments on Trudeau such as coward, terrorist sympathizer and criminal gang supporter. The names he called Trudeau were appropriate and naturally this tirade drew media attention.

“As you know Andrew Scheer and his Cons returned to Parliament determined to pound Justin Trudeau into submission by asking him the same question over and over again. And they were left looking like idiots.”

Scheer and his handlers appear incapable of functioning to any degree of success in employing the media tactics that their opposition has. It is to great degree social media that has empowered the very groups that Scheer courts and alienates simultaneously – the social conservatives in his ranks and various components of the Canadian media. Thus the Yapper is  making one and all look like idiots milling about him.

Perhaps Elizabeth May or the Kid from Redvers are surpassing in this simultaneous alienation of friend or foe but this remains to be seen. All three appear to be in great state of confusion concerning their own brands of identity politics underway and tread into each others hinterland adding additional layers of mental muck on already laden boots.

And the matter of sheer moral rot in all sectors of our social make-up cannot be set aside here. The poisoned apple of media itself displays too much rot at its inner core. And Scheer’s attacks upon media have proven once again to be serving up ‘half-baked pies’ for public consumption that leave the Conservatives with just another case of political indigestion. As pointed out prior, that has all been highly visible in his relationship with campaign chair Hamish Marshall.

But the murky waters surrounding Hamish also have an oily slick on their surface that have attached themselves to our Seagull Scheer in squawking over his share of Ottawa taxpayer fish.

In attacking media, Scheer had tried to inoculate the conservative party against being associated with any perceivable negative press and the Rebel was his chosen target. It was hoped that this would gain ‘brownie points’ with a large audience that displayed disgust with media in general and included those that feared invasion of extreme right political views into Canada.

But Scheer’s campaign manager Hamish Marshall was not only a long-time conservative organizer and former Harper aide he had also been a director of The Rebel News Website Network. Maclean’s at one point described the Rebel under Levant as one of the “world’s top purveyors of conspiracy and far-right bombast.”  And on the Rebel’s election night coverage in 2015, the website’s first foray into live broadcast, Hamish Marshall appeared as an election coverage analyst.

But, what currently makes the oil slick now emerging more dangerous for our Seagull Scheer is that Marshall’s ties to Levant go much further back.  As in this report, there have been renewed concerns about ‘policy ethics and possible contravention of election laws’ through similar events as surrounded Ethical Oil. The pro-oil sands website was founded by the Harper aide named Alykhan Velshi.

Support for the oil industry, opposition to carbon pricing, adversarial positioning to public media and scorn or little interest in climate change are all common themes with Scheer, Marshall and the Rebel gang. An interesting book has emerged surrounding this entire palm greasing business.

The Big Stall: How big oil and think tanks are blocking action on climate change in Canada by Donald Gutstein: In fall 2015, the newly elected Trudeau government endorsed the Paris Agreement and promised to tackle global warming. In 2016, it released a major report which set out a national energy strategy embracing clean growth, technological innovation and carbon pricing. Rather than putting in place tough measures to achieve the Paris targets, however, the government reframed global warming as a market opportunity for Canada’s clean technology sector.

The Big Stall traces the origins of the government’s climate change plan back to the energy sector itself — in particular Big Oil. It shows how, in the last fifteen years, Big Oil has infiltrated provincial and federal governments, academia, media and the non-profit sector to sway government and public opinion on the realities of climate change and what needs to be done about it.

The overall Conservative campaign is a mess due to characters like Hamish working for cash, perks and hidden benefits. Hamish had an agency called Go Nuclear Productions which did work for Ethical Oil. Marshall’s wife also worked for a time as spokesperson for the Ethical Oil Institute. The interests of the Oil Industry and Nuclear Industry are obviously at odds in terms of energy production so what was going on?

It is public news that Hamish was inspired by Levant’s book, Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada’s Oil Sands, published in 2011. So, were the man’s personal designs at play throughout all this as we see him next reincarnate Go Nuclear Productions as Torch Inc. Well, most torches require oil in some manner do they not? And all guns need to be oiled to fire smoothly, don’t they?

It appears to have become one all encompassing oily slick on the Conservative campaign waters that have simply left Seagull Scheer puking up his latest scraps for public consumption.

This is a part of what Maxime Bernier considers to be too corrupted to remain within the CCP and be able to make the necessary reforms to genuine conservative values. He has no intention of trying to raise the Titanic and refurbish it in any manner as tried prior. He is intent upon building an entirely new boat, salvaging only those timbers with absolutely no dry rot from what was once ‘genuine conservative beliefs and policy’. 

 We see Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer has been forced to retreat somewhat from using a line of attack against the media as a ‘hook’ to reel in fish for his party, but even corrupted old-line support in all parties knows this is not going to work in ‘media strategy’.

This will be a real nasty election year for name calling and the two people that dread it the most are Trudeau and Scheer as they bring the rotten titular cries deservedly upon their own heads. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer shared his fear of such at a pre-campaign launch when he lamented to Conservatives: “It’s going to get worse, it’s going to get nasty.”

Of course, it is going to worsen as Scheer continues to blunder his way around the media in the company of the likes of Hamish Marshall. It seems obvious that party hacks do not remember the price paid for such company in the last election. One ‘good old boy’ does however and made the fact known last November 5th as to why the CCP appears to be trudging a guaranteed losers trail. Yaloslav Baran, the Communications Director under former Conservative Prime Minister Harper made this poignant comment surrounding Scheer’s comments and directions:

There could be some ‘immature muscle memory’ kicking around the office from the previous team.’

It seems apparent that the ‘immature muscle memory’ is wearing King Size boots.

How long will you permit your physical and financial security to be tromped into the mud of oblivion by inept political buffoons?

They will all be returning to the Hill in 2019 after a break from a House of Commons performance in 2018 that did not morally entitle the majority of them to any break at the tax payer expense.

In the past the carillon on Parliament Hill played the theme from the Muppets to herald the MPs return to their supposed work. >

They were mocked through the broadcast as politicians such as Scheer have reduced themselves to the status of children’s entertainers, no more than puppets under the lash of the party whips and pens of party hacks.

Someone needs to 24/7 keep the Muppets Broadcast blaring on the Hill until they wake up to this fact.

Oh yeah, almost let this slip past. An obvious addition to the list of nicknames Scheer is bringing upon the Conservatives as he continues to shoot himself in the foot is ‘Grave Digger’. Go ahead, feel free to add it to the employable list unhindered and attend the Conservative funeral.



“Harper may have been a committed conservative but he was also a pragmatist; Scheer is far more theologically driven and is now heavily in electoral debt to social conservatives.”

Atheists, Agnostics, Muslims, Hindus, Scientologists and every other critter of some spiritual persuasion does not have to scamper in fear of a spiritually driven Scheer trying to approach them.  You need not be very concerned about Scheer being ‘too theologically driven’, as his spiritual drive shaft is bent when it comes to the actual Word of God and he violates nearly every ‘moral position’ he piously postures as going to defend.

You need to concern yourselves more about him saying one thing to you, promising something else and simply doing nothing in an ongoing attempt to garner your vote.

Scheer was steeped in standard Roman Catholicism in his Ottawa upbringing and employed his active family life in the Church to his personal political advantage in every manner he could. He postured that his personal Catholic religious convictions were the reason he would defend all other spiritual practices as equal in privilege of protection.

This came to the fore at a time his Roman Catholic cohorts were bragging about his having been selected as the youngest man ever to be Speaker of the House, from 2011 to 2015. He had served as Deputy Speaker in the previous Parliament and Assistant Deputy Speaker from 2006-2008.  The Speaker only votes on issues in the event of a tie which makes it essentially a referee role. The only time one gets to publicly see the Speakers personal position in a policy issue is when they are essentially forced to do so by making a call.

“The Speaker’s job comes with a $233,000 annual salary, an historic residence in the Gatineau Hills, a chauffeured car, an apartment inside Centre Block, lots of opportunities for international travel and a sizable hospitality budget.”

I must assume that this was an inducement toward service for Scheer giving his ‘pad the expense account for cash’ mentality he has displayed. I must also assume that the ‘sizable hospitality budget’ must have somewhere planted visions of golden breast pumps in the Glam Queens brain. The Speakers office gave Scheer oversight of a budget of $441.6 million, the House of Commons staff and the services they provided. He was thus able to ‘referee’ a lot of calls on who got perks and which way patronage was going to flow.

“You shall take no gift: for the gift blinds the wise, and perverts the words of the righteous.  (Exodus 23:8)


 As Speaker of the House there is no substantial voting history to reference his full positioning on, and his dearth of policies released during the leadership campaign have not cleared the view of Scheer to any large degree. In fact, his policy statements have largely led to exposure of his only posturing pious qualities, not truly possessing them. Conservatives and Canadians in general remain swimming in a media sea of what Scheer’s true beliefs might be.

He remains a man of conjecture for most and a butt of jokes to the mainstream.

As Speaker, when a spat occurred surrounding his public display of being a Roman Catholic Scheer stated: “The last time it was a crime to be a Catholic was in 1827 in Nova Scotia when they repealed the penal laws.” “It is a shame that some people are trying again to make members of certain faith groups disqualified from public life.”

Surrounding his selection for Speaker and view of other MP’s Scheer told the House of Commons: “We may disagree fundamentally on issues and ideas, but we all do sincerely want Canada to be the best country it can be. I have come to appreciate that on a personal level with each and every member.”

The coyote crying religious intolerance, his professing the integrity of both fundamental friends and foes and knowing such ‘on a personal level with each and every member’ is but more hypocritical posturing crap of his yap.  (Oh, oh. Now we have the additions of ‘The Yapper’ and ‘Mr. Crap Yap’ to toss into the Media Moniker Pool.)

We are going to look at what Scheer supposedly represents morally through ‘religious convictions’ and some scriptural basis of Roman Catholicism which he postures as being representative of. 


Scheer claims himself to be pro-life in his personal convictions which are based in Roman Catholicism.

“I have always voted in favor of pro-life legislation. I voted according to my conscience every time. I spoke out when Henry Morgentaler received the Order of Canada and I was proud to support Molly’s law. That is an important piece of legislation and I’d like to see it before the House again.”

Molly’s Law, Bill C-225 * was brought forward by Cathay Wagantall surrounding the issue of the recognition of the status of fetal life when considering its demise through the death of a pregnant mother due to the action of murder. Essentially, should the alleged murderer be charged with one count of murder or two?  If passed it would have entailed the leveling of two charges of murder. It was resoundingly defeated 209 to 76 with the only support for it coming from within the Conservative ranks.


The commentary states: “Conservative leadership contenders Brad Trost and Andrew Scheer distinguished themselves by voting for a woman’s right to choose to carry her child to term; we honor these stalwart MP’s for placing human dignity and worth above his political aspirations. May God honor them for that.”

So, our man Scheer is distinguished and honorable in the minds of Christian pro-lifers for “placing human dignity and worth above his political aspirations.” But, events precedent and subsequent to this show the man places nothing above his political aspirations, and that includes the Word of God. 

In Toronto Nov. 17, 2018 Scheer addressed the annual Christians in the Middle East Benefit Dinner with these words: “The federal government’s requirement that churches and their agencies sign an attestation endorsing abortion as a human right before receiving summer job funding violates Canadian human rights in the same way Christian human rights have been violated throughout the Middle East.” 

A pretty emboldened comparison for Scheer considering the Christian human rights violations greatest in the Middle East have largely been comprised of the murderous actions of the followers of Islam. But it does make clear his view that endorsing abortion is the condoning of murder. Within his Roman Catholic world, it is considered a profound sin to endorse abortion or not to take action against it in whatever measures God has enabled them to. Scheer would appear here to simply be taking action against abortion as the newly chosen leader of the PPC. Scheer in essence was apparently at the time not prepared to be regarded as a sinner in the eyes of the Christian electorate or the eyes of God. Again, this has not proven to be the case.

The ultimate support of pro-life leadership contenders’ such as Pierre Lemieux and Brad Trost greatly affected his narrow Party leadership win, as did the tireless party membership sales by the influential anti-abortion group Right Now.

The matter of the abortion issue in 2017 is reflected in the following article and remains essentially the same today. >

At the time we hear Trost and Lemieux suggesting ‘there be a re-examination of the abortion laws in Canada’. And Scheer on the campaign trail has stated intents of creating a “friendlier more welcoming Parliament for individual members to introduce legislation protecting pre-born human rights”.

As well, during the leadership campaign, Scheer stated, ‘I believe 100 per cent that members of Parliament have the right to bring forward and debate any legislation of importance to them.’

Social conservatives were greatly encouraged by this promise of a friendlier and more welcoming environment in Parliament for individual members to introduce legislation protecting pre-born human rights. And, like Harper, Scheer has tried to cash in on their full political usefulness.

Scheer has stamped himself “Christian” by voting against the Liberal gay marriage and transgender rights bill in 2016, but it is the abortion issue that protrudes as the thorn in his side. When the pro-lifers sold thousands of memberships on behalf of Trost and Lemieux that support ultimately went Scheer’s way and they expect him to deliver clearly on the side of being anti-abortion. In press release the pro-lifers As We Need a Law faction plainly stated their goal is nothing less than the ‘regulation of abortion in Canada’, specifically aimed at “protecting fetal interests at some stage of pregnancy.”

Our Yapper has once again shot himself in the foot. He has ramped up expectations that pro-life legislation can be introduced by MP’s; on the other hand, Mr. Compromise is firmly on the record declaring his party policy pledges that a Conservative government will not introduce legislation to revive the abortion debate in Canada.

What is this paragon of pious Roman Catholicism going to do? Make himself virtually unelectable in almost every major political market in Eastern Canada due to the entrenchment of political queers from Toronto and its Metro suburbs to the province of Quebec through opening debate surrounding abortion? Or, does he choose to strangle to death the last of the hardcore social conservative base the scraped him through to leadership by not upholding his word? They too are becoming increasingly disaffected with the man, and more especially since the demands for reform emerged through Maxime Bernier over the past year and a half.

The solution would be for this Scheer, the supposed man of honor who ‘places human dignity and worth above his political aspirations’ to simply adhere to what God states he must do, to practice what God says in how He addresses abortion. There is to be no debate surrounding abortion and if a true Christian Scheer would give a clear statement that abortion is murder in the eyes of God and he will in no way support murder. But he does not do so in spite of the Bible commandment that all matters spoken around murder are to be plainly a ‘yes or no’ circumstance.

But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation. (James 5:12)

The Bible never specifically addresses the issue of abortion by name. The Christian position is clearly given however, there are numerous teachings in Scripture that make it abundantly clear that God’s view of abortion is that it is an act of murder. Jeremiah 1:5 tells us that God knows us before He forms us in the womb. Psalm 139:13-16 speaks of God’s active role in our creation and formation in the womb. Exodus 21:22-25 prescribes the same penalty—death—for someone who causes the death of a baby in the womb as for someone who commits murder. This clearly indicates that God considers a baby in the womb to be as human as a full-grown adult. For the Christian, abortion is not a matter of a woman’s right to choose. It is a matter of the life or death of a human being made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-279:6).

And this article outright states abortion is murder in a manner that might even cut through the fog of our ‘Cheerful Cherub. >  Be warned, it does so in a fashion that too physically establishes their case as being true for many of a ‘sensitive disposition or squeamish stomach.

But the Conservatives under the leadership of Scheer have vowed no matter what they won’t reopen the debate surrounding abortion should he be elected Prime Minister. They have a stated  Conservative policy declaration to back up this fact: 65: “A Conservative government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion.”

And right on its tail is item 66: “The Conservative Party will not support any legislation to legalize euthanasia or assisted suicide.”

Sheer has no genuine fear of the Lord in any of the matters spoken to surrounding actions imposing unrighteous death upon the innocent as spoken in the Word. He tried once again to posture piously in the case of euthanasia and Canada’s prime abortion promoter ‘Dr. Death Henry Morgentaler’ receiving the Order of Canada in 2008. In his own sheer salience, we hear him state: “I took the lead on making sure the recent Euthanasia laws were tightened and restricted as much as possible to protect the vulnerable. We need to improve it to protect conscience rights for doctors and nurses so that no one would be forced to perform a procedure that was against their beliefs. We also need to ensure protection for young people and people who struggle with mental health issues. These are important measures that I will continue to provide leadership on.

Simply restrict it in some degree?  Simply legislate it so you can co-exist with it and not eliminate such actions of death as required by God? What are the worthwhile and morally just protections those struggling with mental health issues are to expect under such leadership?

There is no such compromise as Scheer exhibits in the nature or Word of God. To go against the decrees of the Lord in these matters of death is to make yourself an affront for open acceptance of evil he has declared such actions to be.

Scheer has no genuine love of God for the command given is to hate evil if you do, not to compromise with it. “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil: he preserves the souls of his saints; he delivers them out of the hand of the wicked. (Psalm 97:10)

Nor does Scheer demonstrate any fear of the God of Creation.  “The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.” (Proverbs 8:13)

Scheer has said on the record that he won’t repeal the current government’s assisted death law. If you are not prepared to repeal the assisted death law you are in no manner prepared to enact anything that will define the fetus as God has chosen to do. It is in part for such reason I believe God consistently allows him to keep shooting himself in the foot.

How much longer will you let this hypocrites’ bullets pass through his foot and onward through yours?

Scheer sometimes appears good for his word on the surface to whatever group he is addressing, but beneath the surface he reeks of moral rot.

This same moral rot is what is evidenced in the ‘unity that has kept the CCP’ stumbling onward to encompass the political disaster it is today. The reforms it performs from within are the evidence of the Party destruction and I believe so heinous that Mad Max seen any more internal party efforts as useless.

The sickness of issues like same sex marriage and trans-sexual rights highlight this clearly if you look at them from a truly Christian perspective. But I am not concerned here whether you see from the Christian perspective. My concern is that you see the unveiled character of Andrew Scheer and why he is not qualified for leadership due to his ‘most basic nature and instinctual displays’. You need not concern yourself at this point about possible violation of Christian principals unless you are a Christian. Andrew Scheer through his posturing being Christian shows that he is not a man of true principles. He will violate anything that does not serve his own personal designs and desires, it does not matter if what is being violated is faith based or not.

In other words, he is a Duplicitous Dude with a morally squashed self-serving and nauseating fawning personality performance.

There have been volumes written as to how God views same-sex marriage and homosexuality in general. We are not going to rehash them. One verse is enough to sum it up: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.  (Leviticus 18:22)

And as to the trans people of every fashion think about this: “The woman shall not wear that which pertains unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.  (Deuteronomy 22:5) If the donning of inappropriate attire is so detestable with God, think about just how nauseating a stench it is to Him in your transiting to another sexuality physically.

There were  major policy changes at the Conservative convention in 2016, following which Scheer stated his belief Canadians had moved on from the same-sex marriage debate. This certainly is not so given all the media hub bub we have endured surrounding the matter since he made the statement.

We are going to briefly look at how the ‘major policy changes’ came about to brand the CCP as having become ‘too morally corrupt to be reformed’.

The Full-Blown Conservative Rot In 2016

Pouty Pon and Hapless Heap teamed up with Calgary MP Calgary–Nose Hill MP Michell Man Crapper Rempel to get a motion to change the CPC traditional policy definition of marriage onto the 2016 CCP platform floor for voting. It went thus went from a “union between one man and one woman” to the all inclusive socially destructive puss it oozes out today.

Ahead of the ashes of the disastrous 2015 election Natalie Pouty Pon, the 24-year-old accountant was sitting on the executive of the Edmonton West Conservative riding association working furiously. She was pressing onward with her personal childhood ambition to be “the best female Prime Minister Canada has ever had.” Fueling the fire was her ethnic Chinese background, hard core feminist beliefs and spiritual disease.

The ugliness of the 2015 campaign progressively added fuel to her anger. Like many of immigrant Chinese extraction she harbored resentments for the closeted prejudices against the fiscally prominent Chinese Canadians in Canada that she knew first hand.

Personally, her great-grandfather paid the Chinese Head Tax to immigrate to Canada, her grandfather had a Chinese restaurant in a small town in Alberta, saving every dollar he earned and put his four kids including her father through university. The ethnic Chinese orientation toward hard-work and monetary accumulation is the reason for claims she beds down with ‘fiscally minded conservatives’ and leans toward limiting roles for government. Perhaps being fiscally minded for her is responsibly creating, optimizing and maintaining a balanced budget and not limited to the mentality of pad the expense account as seen with Big Blue Boss.

But it is also her Chinese heritage rooted in the school of thought represented by Confucius with its contempt for women and proclamations of male superiority and female inferiority that have molded her mindsets with respect to sexuality. Confucius ranted that “Women and slaves like inferior men are hard to get along with, they get out of hand when befriended and they resent it when kept at a distance.” His loyal successor Mencius said women must do as men say and the wife must in no way act against the wishes of her husband. For certain, the Chinese one child policy which caused the mass aborting of females to wait for a male child to carry on the family name has affected her. This has impelled her to becoming a rabid feminist defining the 2015 election as “one fought solely on “fear,” says Pon, not without anger — “fear of what is different or of what you don’t understand.”

Pouty Pon was living out her own ethnic sexual identity crisis, fearing anything that defined the male-female relationship with such absoluteness as the traditional Conservative policy definition of marriage. She was in a fury to destroy it before the election took place in 2015 and failed. This only increased subsequent and was stoked higher when she met up with Hapless Heap.

Our Hapless Heap is an appalling character that only became aware of the traditional Conservative definition of marriage after the Trudeau slaughter of the Conservative sheep in 2015. As the 26-year-old riding association president for Fort McMurray–Cold Lake, the electrical engineer was jolted into action by professed ‘libertarian idealism’. He claimed the definition to be a restriction of personal freedom surrounding matters of choice and “fundamentally it’s a liberty issue for me.” Liberty for what Hapless? To continue publishing such features as this amid your favorite YouTube posts: > Ooh, what are you really trying to say Hapless?

Our pair states their first meeting was at Calgary where each was to attend the Alberta Congress, the Conservative party’s policy forum for Albertan members of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). They also claim that unbeknownst to each other, they had brought forward identical resolutions to kill the marriage plank at the Congress that was to be held that weekend.

Unabashedly I state their statements reek.

However, through their efforts the twin motions passed almost unanimously and they began daily pursuing their target of killing off traditional marriage. They cold-called Conservative MPs and leadership candidates, they hunted out supporters for the motion on Twitter and social media and planned strategies determined to suck the life blood out of the Canadian family. This pitted them against the Campaign Life Coalition >

The opposition did not stop The Twit Twins. Yep, it was Pouty Pon and Hapless Heap that co-sponsored the motion to permanently turn the CCP into the ‘queer endorsing edifice’ it joyfully embraced in attempts to chart a new route to victory.  The majority of the 2300 delegates gathered in Vancouver for the Tories’ biennial policy conference ultimately agreed with them, showing just how far the general spiritual rot was entrenched in the Canadian Conservative Party.

Here’s a brief video clip for you about the events and you can hear our Queer Dears state their self-perceived heroic stance. > 1:18  The Conservative party voted to delete the same sex marriage ban.

And, it was Calgary–Nose Hill MP Michelle Rempel that championed their motion to get it onto the convention floor for voting promulgating: “When you look at Canadian pluralism, what unites us are our shared values, but we have to ensure equality among Canadians — every definition of that word.”

Shared values?

Rempel fully exposed her queer preferences for family inclusiveness telling party faithful about her beloved gay cousin:  “She is brilliant. She contributes to our country. And she’s gay,” Rempel said, her voice cracking. Our party is the party of equal rights. We are the party of equality and freedom, and it’s about time we passed this resolution.”

But it was Pon and Heap that flooded the room with friendlies to their cause that enabled Rempel to get it to the full party convention floor for voting.

In the end, Conservatives voted 279-143 to strike the traditional definition of marriage from party policy. Rempel, who considers herself a proud, Conservative feminist, was in tears when the final count was announced.

“I got emotional, right?” she told Maclean’s with a frustrated sigh. “It’s a thing we chicks do,” she added, sarcastically. “But if you’re flying across the country every week and you have 110,00 people who have given you this amazing privilege to go and be their voice, you should be passionate about it.”

But just how passionate is this Running Rempel the divorcee who ran herself in Calgary North in 2011 sometime after hubby vacated? Just what events most impacted the scrambled eggs of her life to hatch out the ‘emotionally driven things chicks do’ that she has displayed? How much of a full-blown Man Crapper had she become through the ‘emotional support’ of her voice cracking gay cousin? Rempel states her desire is to focus on “taking the Conservative lens and transposing it over the lens of being a woman.”

How many ways should Canada look for with Running Rempel pushing her gay feminist agenda?”

Our media prominent trio appear to be basically nothing more than just three more spiritually mixed up queer endorsing assassins that finalized the hijacking of traditional marriage within the Conservative Party.

Saskatoon MP Brad Trost warned that “The traditional family is the bedrock of society. You cannot have a functioning free-enterprise society without it.” He added that the Party would become nothing more than ‘liberal-lite’ and “what’s the point of having another Liberal party?”

He was right and there is no point continuing to double the mess of the Trudeau government through what transpires with Scheer and the diversity that interim Party leader Rona Ambrose espoused at the 2016 convention. She reminded party faithful that Justin Trudeau’s Liberals didn’t have a lock on diversity, bragging that ‘the first Muslim MP and the first Pakistani senators’ were Conservatives and that “This weekend, we will start to write the next chapter of our story.”

What is her next chapter? More entrenchment of Islamists with the same sharia laden desires as those that Trudeau has assured would advance his desires in our nation? For certain the Ambrose designation of next chapter found its voice in 2016 with the Muslim voice rising up that Conservatives had to do more to protect their rights.

Islam was trying to strengthen its positioning within the Conservative ranks, to amass control of this sector the same way it had done through Trudeau in 2015. A 47-year-old Muslim delegate working in Brampton MP Kyle Seeback’s by the name of Urz Heer had been dispatched for such purposes. >

In an emotional debate “it was Urz Heer who made the more lasting impressing on the room. She broke down as she assailed the party for its strategy. “The last election campaign was a disaster. I’m also a Muslim and the campaign targeted us, unfairly,” she said, her voice shaking with emotion. “This party worked actively and aggressively against my people.” When some delegates fired back that it did not, Heer doubled down: “It did,” she insisted. “It did.” “This country belongs to everyone, including me. For the first time I felt that I didn’t belong here, and this is my country. It’s unfair. It was unfair to my people.”

The ploy was effective with Rosa Ambrose, the feminists and every Conservative kafir in the room. Islam would be championed by them. But marriage equality was still seen as the essential first step to creating a more open, more welcoming and more deeply branded gay Canada. It was used to fully kick off the strategy of the gay alliance to emerge through the confused Big Blue Boss that bubbled up through their sexuality sewer leadership selection in 2017.

Back in 2016 the average Canadians didn’t care much about party rules, regulations and what entrenchment of Policies through Parliamentary Bills truly entailed. But the hard-core interest groups on all sides of the fence did and were determined to overhaul the Conservative party constitution to their full advantage in centralizing power-grabs.

What has changed is that the pain endured through a blind emotional embrace of Trudeau in 2015 and current social economic woes has shattered the general public lethargy to the degree that all political hacks are truly feeling the heat.

Now, our Islam Oozing Urz was correct in feeling “that I didn’t belong here” for the fact is she doesn’t. This country does not belong to everyone, it is not her country and there certainly is no unfairness to her people in stating it in no manner belongs to any follower of Islam. The followers of Islam have the stated dedicated purpose of the institution of sharia in every nation they enter.

This was the dedicated purpose of Urz that entered the policy debate in 2016 that arrogantly thought it had won the next stage of entrenchment as kafir fools and sexual tools erupted in the victory from their ‘politically correct debates’.

Scheer Claims as speaker he established himself as a defender of free speech and debate. That through his record as The Speaker he displayed the authenticity of his convictions. As a leadership candidate he stated:

“I believe 100% that Members of Parliament have the right to bring forward and debate any legislation of importance to them. Debate is invaluable in a healthy democracy. I’m not just saying it, I’m the only leadership candidate that has proven that by my actions. As Speaker of the House, I issued a ruling which upheld MP Mark Warawa’s right to speak on sex-selective abortion when the Whip attempted to prevent him. I ruled that an MP’s right to speak did not come from their party or leader, but was their democratic right. I will absolutely continue that practice as Leader and Prime Minister. Moreover, I have committed that all votes on matters of conscience will be free votes.”

But in April 2013 what actually took place “is that Andrew Scheer determined that in a specific case, Conservative MP Mark Warawa’s privileges were not violated in March when his own party blocked him from speaking about sex-selection abortion in the Commons. He said there was no evidence that Warawa had been “systematically prevented” from speaking in the chamber.

But he said Warawa may have a “legitimate concern” about whether MPs are getting “equitable distribution” in speaking, and said it was his job as Speaker to ensure fairness.

Scheer told MPs that in future, if they want to say something in the House, they don’t necessarily need to go through their party whip.”

Scheer stated he will continue to be guided by lists that party whips give him that provide a heads-up of which MP’s are due to take to their feet and make a statement.

But he stressed that he will not be tied to the lists completely. Indeed, he promised that if MP’s not on the lists want to speak, they can rise on their own, catch Scheer’s attention in the chair, and ask to be allowed to speak.”

Scheer wanted one and all to need his permission to speak or debate then and remains of the same attitude now. Scheer has arbitrarily assured the pot heads he won’t roll back the Liberals’ new marijuana legislation and declared that he has no plans to try and re-open debates surrounding abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage or trans-gender rights. What Trudeau has implanted he will be making certain is left unhindered.

But the most bizarre thing about Scheer’s approach to our social issues is the fact that he thinks Canadians don’t care what his Conservatives believe — as long as they have the good taste to shut up about it. He told the Globe that even though he holds socially conservative beliefs, he will never officially discuss any of these issues in Parliament if the Tories get back into government.”

“I’ve made it very clear that I won’t reopen those issues. And my position hasn’t changed. My job is to make sure our caucus and our movement is united. That means not bringing up divisive issues that would divide even our own party.”

Scheer simply will not face up to or look for solutions to the problems facing our Nation. He has vowed not to, but perhaps he just might change his mind having proven to be the ‘unprincipled bastard that he is’.

But Is Scheer a Closet Racist?

No. Scheer is not a racist. But he is so damn stupid in his scramble for ‘electoral positioning’ that he doesn’t appear to even know who he is being buddied up with for photo-ops. But he is not a racist. He just appears stupid. > Andrew Scheer’s team distances itself from anti-immigration group…

In June 2018 Catherine Major, the Conservative party’s Quebec press secretary and Rivière-du-Nord riding president Hugues Bonneau appeared just as stupid when one and all were caught up in Conservative associations with the radical political group le Meute. The Big Blue Leader had his picture taken at a gathering of the self-styled anti-Islamist and anti-multiculturalism group.

When the issue blew our characters tried to dodge the truth about themselves. Catherine Major first gave pretense of innocence stating that she was only friends on Facebook with Mr. Bonneau in his political capacity and that his political online profile has nothing to do with La Meute. But the Facebook group had been set up for fans of La Meute in the nationalist Saguenay region which was part of the Chicoutimi-Le Fjord riding and Scheer was there to ramp up Federal Conservative support for 2019 through speaking precedent to the by-election that was underway.

And Bonneau’s political profile has everything to do with him. She is undoubtedly very stupid claiming not knowing even one of the le Meute figures that attended. She must also be legally blind in pretense that she would not have recognized the insignia on the attire the characters were wearing. It was extremely well known through the media and also highly popular with many Quebecois Conservatives in both civilian and military capacities. Yet she happily had ‘chuckles’ escorted into photo-ops with the Wolf Pack and thinks she can proclaim innocence?

When the fiasco surfaced, she was ultimately left with no way out and she demanded the resignation of Rivière-du-Nord riding president Hugues Bonneau that had brought the pack scampering through her doors. “Our positions are clear. We don’t accept this, we condemn any racism. So those people can do what they want but we don’t agree with this.”

But, her positioning does not in any manner stamp Scheer as a racist, only stupid through blind association.

And, “in his post, made from a personal Facebook account, Mr. Bonneau specifies that he acts as an electoral district president in his civilian capacity and not as a “wolf.” Say duh boys and girls, say duh! The stupidity of such statement will not even warrant serious comment.

When demanded to resign, the civilian Hughes Bonneau of le Meute Clan 15 surrendered a political party office, not a civilian office. Naturally, he refused to offer any comment why when requested.

By the way, in the by-election, Conservative candidate Richard Martel stole away the riding from Justin Trudeau’s Liberals. I guess this will likely reinforce Conservative Party hacks it is best to leave Scheer just as stupid as he appears.

But all this still doesn’t brand Scheer as a racist. Just stupid in, by and through associations.

But political hacks have shown great determination in trying to brand the Conservative Party Poster Boy Family Man as a true racist.

The Party had already determined the best hope for any serious mileage with Scheer would be to present him and his family as the model for Canadians to follow. “The party is working on policies they say are more reflective of everyday Canadians than the Liberal path, and presenting a leader with a family more representative of them too.”

Brand Scheer, with the family’s daily activities was already being chronicled on the party’s social media accounts. The ‘Jack and Jill of Conservative Political Hopes’, the pair merrily learning to ‘move past old fights and make it easy to say sorry’, the pair so knowledgeable and intimate with one another that they would ‘finish each other’s sentences, teasing each other to the point of blushing over parenting pitfalls’ are somewhat a case of double duh. But they are not and never conceivable to my knowledge guilty of being racist.

But, as the following report shows there were clearly attempts to tie Scheer and many major Conservatives party members into being racist. When you read it take note that our Running Rempel comes popping up in the article. Read it and you decide who is at fault and how. >   Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer Defends Heckler … -…

Personally, I do not see what is reported brands Scheer as undoubtedly being a racist. I believe it simply presses the branding iron more heavily into a mark already emblematic of Scheer stupidity.

Perhaps Scheer is more stupid than even members of his Party suspect? Does he even comprehend what some of his key campaign buddies may actually be up to?

Maybe all CPP party members should question just how astute his Campaign Chairman really is? Perhaps Marshall is still actually working for the office Scheer knew him to be in when he was selected for the job. You must remember the Marshall Rat Rebel Roots go back a long way.

In the next link ‘Creepy Con Leader’ Andrew Scheer is deemed guilty of leading a tainted leadership race, but he was correct in stating that the race ‘was going to get worse’ with more negatives floating to the surface. The linked post itself proves the veracity of his statement. The presence of the post is evidence that things were getting worse. If they were’t we would never have been confronted by the posting. Now to Racists and cons >  Andrew Scheer And The Corruption Of The Cons

We have looked at the reality of Andrew Scheer’s spiritual camouflage giving a ‘heads-up’ horn blast. It leaves grass roots social conservatives in desperate need of a leader who actually lives out the values he espouses rather than simply paying lip service to them.

Scheer is incapable of halting the political chaos Canada is falling into and forcing us further into social climates no one truly desires.

I guess in all Andrews misapplied lip service he has earned the additional moniker of ‘Captain Chapstick’.



Former Harper cabinet minister Monte Solberg told Maclean’s that climate change is the most important policy issue facing the party and country.  But, what would Solberg know since he is a former evangelical Reformer?

Surrounding climate change the smell certainly is remaining the same amid the polecats and the skunks.

Polecats >

The polecat is a weasel-like Eurasian mammal with mainly dark brown fur and a darker mask across the eyes, noted for ejecting a fetid fluid when threatened.

This migrant must have hidden in the luggage of Climate Barbie or one of the 126 “necessary people” in her entourage she carried along to the United Nations Global Warming Conference in the city of Katowice, Poland.

All of this action on the part of the Odious Environment Minister at taxpayers’ expense has raised another fetid stench in the Liberal camp.

The color of the polecat is the reason I know he must have hidden motionless in the entourage luggage as his fetid stench would never disclose him in their midst.

And this fellow definitely was a Conservative bred European varmint on his way to assist Big Blue Boss Scheer in his time of great political need. You can tell he is conservative by the blue tinge to his fur.

In the Scheer Camp he does not need to remain motionless due to aroma or fearing color detection. He can mill around to his hearts content amid his North American cousins, the skunks!

The Rebel Media host Sheila Gunn Reid has a particular disgust for phoniness of the Climate Barbie Crew and the ‘freedom of speech killing antics’ of the Trudeau government. A staunch ‘grass roots conservative girl’ she does not try to avoid expressing such sentiments towards both Provincial and Federal elements when it is necessary. She simply despises what is fake and perceptible as corrupt to the best of her knowledge.

You can view her Rebel Gunn report of the recent Global Climate Change Conference at > 6:23

From the Gunner: “You’d think people who hate fossil fuels so much would jet around the world a little less. But that’s what they don’t tell you about these global warming conferences — they’re fake. You’ve heard about fake news, right? Well these UN global warming conferences invented it.

I spent a week there, documenting all the fake news, all the hypocrisy, and all the very fancy people living the high life at the public expense:

There were 1,541 journalists accredited by the UN to cover the conference. But McKenna instructed the UN to refuse to accredit me — specifically because I asked questions that she didn’t like. The UN actually told me that in their official rejection letter — McKenna’s entourage demanded I be banned.

Obviously, that didn’t stop me from going to Poland and filing more than a dozen video reports — you can see them all here.”

There will be no long debates presented here on the validity of the arguments surrounding ‘climate change’ in its myriad components. Our concern remains the moral validity of the major Canadian political characters pressing their arguments.

And according to the Toronto Sun, ‘from start to finish both Trudeau and Scheer are spouting nonsense and both need to be more honest.’

As to climate change in the 2019 federal election, the choice Canadians face between the Liberals and Conservatives is bleak according to Lorrie Goldstein. I agree.

Why? If anyone should have a ‘warrantable view’ on personal climate change it should be Lorrie. He is an adamant journalist as events have shown. He has proven tenacious in looking for truth.

On January 21, 2018 Goldstein had a ‘heart attack’. By February 24, 2018 he published the reality of the experience >

By July 4, 2018 he had published the Sun Article > Goldstein: Trudeau and Scheer talking nonsense on climate change…

Gunn and Goldstein have definitely been eating the same brand of rolled oats long enough to discern the ‘synthetic and genetically modified brands’ that are responsible for ‘fake news’. It would be of benefit to the West and Eastern unity of the nation and media world betterment in general if they were to do a National TV broadcast presenting their views. This is especially so now that the specter of the Western Provinces separation has been prodded to raise its head.

From his July 4, 2018 report we hear Lorrie Goldstein state:

“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has a plan that won’t work and Conservative leader Andrew Scheer doesn’t have a plan.

It would be more honest for Trudeau to admit that his carbon pricing plan is mostly symbolic, based on the argument it’s better to do something rather than nothing, and that it will not meet his commitments to the UN.

It would be more honest for Scheer to either admit the Conservatives don’t believe man-made climate change is real, in which case Canadians shouldn’t be financially penalized for it, or that it is real but the cost of fighting it is too high, when the rest of the world hasn’t bought in.

Instead, Trudeau and Scheer are spouting nonsense.”

Lorrie quite flatly states the major problem we face is the dishonesty of the leadership of both sides.

And, I must state: ‘Good for you Mr. Goldstein, may you press onward with renewed strength and vigor in 2019”.

Both Trudeau and Scheer are creating a polluted political ocean of discontent in Canada through their bipartisan self-serving designs. And it has shown worsening in their matters surrounding immigration.

Does the political climate change with Scheer? Yes, and it can only worsen if his influence is not quickly removed in the run-up to the 2019 election.



Craig Damian Smith says that ‘Andrew Scheer and Maxime Bernier, while now leading rival parties, have the common need of courting far-right support on the migrant-immigration issues.

And, Daniel Stockemer from the University of Ottawa says that scapegoating migrants pays off at the ballot box but results in policies with negative economic, social and security outcomes.

Many persons believe that it is xenophobia or islamophobia that is the cause of false opinions and false news that fosters crises. Such sources tout that Canadians’ strong opinions surrounding immigration and migrants are based on feelings rather than facts. This is garbage can rhetoric.

But crises do exist and crises do demand action. And such actions need to be proactive and not reactive such as simple Liberal cabinet shuffling and appointment of supposedly tough guy Bill Blair as Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction. This is simply reactive posturing and they might just as well given B.B. King the post for nothing of any merit will emerge with Bill Blair. This is just another case of Trudeau’s prime philosophical stance surrounding the Canadian populace: “If you can’t baffle them with brains, baffle them with bullshit’!

And, Conservatives under Scheer simply will not be spared when it comes to being baffled by bullshit as he continues turning on the pumps full force to spread his own particular color of Blue cure.

And statements made by Michelle ‘Running’ Rempel, now the Conservative Party of Canada’s immigration critic, calling on the Liberals to declare the entire Canada-U.S. border an official point of entry — a measure that would close a perceived loophole in the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement is whacko.

This is the standard whine around the border agreement in place. “The Safe Third Country Agreement means that if they do try and cross at a regular land border … they will be sent back to the United States, where we know many will face detention and deportation without a fair process.”

The judgment of US immigration policy and its measures of due and fair process are utilized as a political football for special interest groups to attain their own designs.

Under the agreement permitting legal entry only at designated points critics say too many making an asylum claim at the border are turned back to the United States. It is because of the agreement and processing time they say asylum seekers cross illegally into Canada in order to file claims.

How would declaring the entire border a legal point of entry speed up the process of claims for people prepared to act illegally no matter what? And, who needs people admitted to the country that are already prepared to break our laws if we do not meet their desired terms of entry?

Running Rempel is running her mouth with as about much foresight as that employed by Catherine Major which she added le Meute to the ‘guest list’ for photo time with Chuckles.

When Maxime Bernier made his break from the Conservative Party in favour of forming an intellectually and morally authentic right-wing party, his tweets surrounding the extreme multiculturalism and cult of diversity blanketing Canadian politics were true. And both of these ‘ideological miscreants’ are pushing the recognizably greatest threat to Canada which are the matters of immigrants and migrants. 

This has been brought once again to the fore, attempting to jolt some sanity back into the country through postings and videos surrounding The QUIGGIN REPORT.

Tom Quiggin‘is a former military intelligence officer and current court-qualified expert on terrorism. He has created a meticulous and extremely credible body of research that reaches deep into the world of scams that use Canadian taxpayer money to both directly and indirectly finance terrorist operations. His work is chilling as he alleges that such operations have proceeded beyond private manipulation to include support from Government of Canada agencies and personalities. The allegations are truly monumental and speak not only to the fraudulent use of taxpayer funds but also to the compromising of national security Accordingly, Mr. Quiggin has petitioned the RCMP to investigate his considered allegations in light of relevant Criminal Code of Canada provisions.’

His background in terrorism and international policing is far more extensive then what is in the brief statement made.

And you can locate his letter and research publications on many matters surrounding terrorism and immigration at >

The entirety of immigration, migrants, terrorists and government corrupt mishandling of the same bubbled to the surface just pre-Christmas 2018 with the antics of the Muslim Killer Omar Khadr. The ingrate was trying to get bail conditions altered and a Canadian passport.

Khadr was trying once again to manipulate the system so he could regain his ability to move about more freely to carry on the terrorist activities that made him the young hero amid the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.  Omar Khdar > 5:49

The Rebel was quick to refresh the truth about this animal. Americas top forensic psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner details what a threat this man remains to National Security due to his Islamic extremism and devotion to sharia.  > 8:03

The ISIS poster boy had his request to rabidly roam denied >

Justice June Ross denied Omar Khadr’s request for relaxed bail conditions and a Canadian passport. She said that nothing has changed since the last time Khadr asked for eased bail conditions and there’s no evidence the current restrictions create hardship or are needlessly strict.

“The passage of another year has changed neither Mr. Khadr’s legal status nor my view of the law,” Ross said in Edmonton Court of Queen’s Bench. “The evidence does not indicate a current hardship arising from bail conditions.”

It is a wise decision she made as one thing certainly has changed. The matter surrounding the issue of Omar Khadr, and if he again receives Trudeau Islamic assistance support is the matter that has changed from coast to coast. The fury in Canadians over the corrupt handling of Omar Khadr by that Trudeau pack if continued is the straw that shall break the camels back of Canadian tolerance and patience.

If Omar Khadr and his legal cronies are not brought to true legal accounting soon, the lack of action shall be the spark to ignite the violence, blood and chaos in our streets that Trudeau, Globalists and Islamists all desire. It will be the action that allows them to instill their own brand of anarchy.

During the time-frame of the Omar play through the Court the Trudeau crew knew that immigration was going to be the central issue heading into 2019 campaign. Trudeau started lashing out immediately at the Conservatives as being the cause of potential immigration problems, problems he claimed to be non-existent. >

But as Menzies of the Rebel brought to the front on Trudeau, immigrants and migrants was ‘the devil in the details’ of what the Trudeau’s UN compliances was bringing upon us. Devilish details >

Trudeau’s handlers have known for some time their Islamic-globalist agenda had the potential for blowing up on their own camp. As a result, at this same time of Khadr, Global Compacts and naughty media they had their man in checkered socks announce he plans to amend the Parliament of Canada Act.

Justin Trudeau says his government hopes to make legal changes that will cement his transformation of the Senate into a more independent, non-partisan chamber, making it harder for a future prime minister to turn back the clock. >

This ‘Policy Cementing Disguise’ to attempt securing what he had already implemented in behalf of Islam is totally unnecessary with the Scheer Conservatives for Big Blue Boss had already stated he would not be opening up such ‘divisive issues’.

Our Harper with Dimples has social media madness, calling out for any followers he can possibly get. That is why he stated back in July 2017: “My message is that the Conservative Party is an inclusive party, that welcomes the contributions of people of the Muslim faith, and I’m glad that they make up our cultural fabric.” — Andrew Scheer > July 2017

But as far back as > June 29, 2015 – Two years prior I had sent him and every other major Conservative player the posting – Don’t Swallow Khadr Ka-Ka Canada.

But our Scheer continues to desperately call out for followers no matter who or what they may represent. He is just ecstatic to get any response at all. >

So, who is to the right and the only one left standing of a once genuine corruption free Conservative party, one that can bring some sanity of leadership and a perceivable end to the terrorism threatening the nation?

There certainly not anyone in the NDP, Green or ‘outer limits lump’ that can provide the leadership and force necessary to eliminate the threats to National security now looming.

We are faced with the simple fact that only Maxime Bernier appears to be able to prevent us from slipping into further chaos.



The longer Scheer tries to hang on the worse it shall get. Whatever stimulus, satisfaction or spiritually perverted release he might get hanging on , it will only leave him lamenting like a dehydrated, dried up old man that the Thrill is Gone > 11:58

Will Scheer somehow come clear and ‘receive special treatment’ from younger men that will leave him genuinely thanking them from a heart somehow cleansed? There can be a ‘real human element’ for positive change when people come together, but it does not take place in the framework that Scheer now boxes himself within or the BB King blues brigade.

The special treatment that Scheer needs is for some younger men to lead him into a genuine personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

At the start of this year on January 5, 2018 in the Globe and Mail reporter John Ibbitsen declared  > Scheer is going nowhere if he continues as Mr. Enigma – The Globe…

And Mr. Enigma with his party whips, hacks, half-wits and imported strategists have proven the Ibbitsen statement true. They seem to be cursed in their attempts to garner favorable image of themselves. Things just don’t work out to their desired effect as Ibbitsen has portrayed as the Beyak fiasco: “Senator Lynn Beyak is manna from heaven for Liberal strategists and their allies who seek to portray the Conservative Party as racist, sexist and homophobic.

In the dead of night, Thursday, the Conservative Party released a statement saying Ms. Beyak had been expelled from the caucus for posting racist comments from correspondents on her website.

The Conservatives had stripped the senator of roles and responsibilities, after she gave a speech in March, 2017, praising what she called the “abundance of good” that took place in residential schools.

The speech, however controversial, was not racist. But as is often the case, the senator took comfort in those who supported her, including some whose views were vile. For posting those views on her website, she earned her expulsion.”

Over time has the clown show antics of Scheer earned him the title of “Bozo Junior” as he wanders the political landscape seemingly lost somewhere under the big tent of corrupted Federal politics? He truly does not appear to have an overall plan to move the Nation forward in the manners that appear to be required.

Trudeau just travels in checkered socks from one serious foot in mouth moment to another, but it appears Scheer has checkered socks wadded continuously in his mouth.

Justin Trudeau is somebody who at least has a plan as despicable as it may be and he surrounds himself with people who can actually get his dirty deeds accomplished.  Scheer doesn’t even have that and I think we need to thank God that he doesn’t. The body politic does not need two supreme Trudeau assholes to carry on defecating all over us.

It is stated that Canadians who traditionally voted Conservative voted Liberal in the last election because they didn’t see any difference.

And critics also claim Andrew Scheer is a Donald Trump wannabe with the only difference being he knows how to put a complete sentence together. Not so. You might not like Trump’s direction but he has one, while Andrew Scheer is unfit to lead because he has no direction that does not lead into further drain upon the public purse.

What do I dislike about Andrew Scheer? Obviously, quite a bit. But uppermost is that the nation does not need leadership under anyone who is so inept he has drawn the names upon himself he does. I pray there soon is no more necessity for adding to the list.

Canada deserves much better than the Scheer ascribed below.

‘Snot Bubbles Scheer, Mr. Compromise, Aw Shucks Scheer, Bozo Scheer, Mr. Blush, Red Nose, Peter Principle Scheer, Harper with a Smile, Chuckles, Harper Without the Richard Nixon Vibe, The Cookie Monster, Seagull Scheer, Harper Lite, Leader of the Cons, Creepy Con Leader, Cheerful Cherub, Bland Man, Big Blue Boss, Unprincipled Bastard, Unhandy Andy, Bozo Junior, Captain Chapstick, Duplicitous Dude, Stephen Harper with Dimples and a few others.

As stated, I pray necessity does not add more to his list as time appears no friend of Scheer.



Scheer is simply going to be Maxed Out through common sense approaches to political matters.  His ignorance in political problem solving is a crime against rational approaches to ending many of our current problems. He has been in full pursuit of political power for securing his own base of well-being.

But he is not to my understanding driven in such manner to be deliberately seeking the destruction of our nation and thus deserving prison time. That privilege has rightfully been reserved for himself by Justin Trudeau.

In wrapping up this Scheer package I feel a sense of disgust, pity and somewhat compassionate toward the poor bastard for his own self-victimization. Similar I guess to that I have toward the Kid from Redvers. I pray for his coming to true spiritual enlightenment and a right relationship with Jesus Christ who he knows only in name and not relationship. He cannot remain within the Papal bondages of his ‘peanut butter heritage’ and know true peace upon this earth and for certain will remove himself from such eternally if he does not change.

So, I wish him the best spiritually, but politically he needs to brought to dramatic halt.

This is about as neutral a biography of the Brand Scheer Career I have found. Read it and think about the negative light I have had to cast this man’s shadow in. > Andrew Scheer | The Canadian Encyclopedia

Trudeau must go now from the political landscape. We have matured enough to recognize such fact.

Have we also matured enough to recognize that Sheer is not the man for the job? If Scheer does not exit willingly, he will to large degree remain both symbolic and realistically a roadblock to ensuring speedy dispatch of Trudeau in absolute defeat.

CCP you need to stop trying to get a Scheer pitch to Millennial voters that will appeal to them and recognize his ‘social media moments’ are at best cringe-worthy and need to stop.

With the ‘leadership time now under his belt’ and his performance display he shall continue to fail miserably in dealing with the Liberals and he will for certain be ground to a tepid mush in the barnstorm crush of Bernier from coast to coast. All the evidence is backing up this claim for the S in Scheer simply stands for stagnation.  

There is no more time for a Conservative journey into Scheer fantasy land where the clouds of corruption billow high and hinder seeing our Nation truly a North strong and free.

Why not let the Conservative movement in Canada now become what is was envisioned to be?

Bernier has grasped onto the roots of conservativism for his own cherished life and is reaching out a hand to you. Do whatever you desire.

But, consider what has been spoken and remember this fact, it is your judgment in all matters that is being exercised as I stated commencing The Kid from Redvers.


NDP – Jangatte Singh – “The Turbanator

I find this man’s name spelled in many different manners. What shall we choose to name this guy? Perhaps Jangled Singed, Sarson ka Saag, Makki di Roti or Tandoori Tom?

The most frequent spelling that crosses my path is that of Jagmeet Singh. But I think “The Turbanator” is best suited and would bring a genuine smile of acknowledgment to his face just as Mad Max and The Albertan from Quebec does to that of Maxime Bernier.

This man is truly a blessing for the Federal NDP after the moronic leadership it endured under Tom Mulcair. He appears genuinely charismatic within his own ranks and is light years ahead of Red Nose in being able to garner positive media attention simply through an honest projection of his personal beliefs.

There is however little hope for the Turbanator being able to resurrect the NDP Zombie to any form of life that will in 2019 or onward have any major impact in Canadian politics. The ghosts of Tommy Douglas are disappearing forever through their ideological dispersal across the broader spectrum of the Canadian political landscape.

As to the Turbanator, it would be best if he never disappeared as he is not simply interesting. He is articulate, has significant professional experience and proven popularity with ordinary voting people in that he has raised more funds for campaign 2019 than Baby Trudeau was able to in 2013 and we know Scheer was able to in 2017.

The man expresses his mind on policies important to Canada ranging from criminal justice and electoral reform to new tax policies and matters of prime importance to First Nations. He makes a lot of sense in what he presents and I find it a shame that basically the campaign money raised will be misspent chasing the memories of what leftists though might be achievable in Canada. It simply never will take place.

Quebec, Ontario and BC are the only sectors of Canada where the NDP Feds have any hope at all of being a presence after October 2,2019. I think the Turbanator has recognized this fact in that we see has finally officially tossed his turban into the by-election electoral ring of Burnaby South in 2019. >

The NDP and Sikh community in British Columba should pretty much assure him of the winner’s diadem which will have to be pinned to the turban so visibly displayed daily in the man’s walk. His character is such that he will not compromise personal spiritual conviction for political or financial gain and it is such genuine life enhancing moral solidity needed today.

But December 29, 2018 we learned in the coming by-election the Conservatives were running the Lawyer Jay Shin, the Green’s didn’t have a candidate worth running and that the Liberals were placing a triple chip bet with the Chinese day care business woman Karen Wang. >  I hope she hasn’t picked up Liberal groping habits for the sake of both Shin and the Turbanator.

The Conservatives and Liberals are trapped within their respective games of identity politics.

It shall prove very interesting to see who comes forward based on the principles of Mad Max. Why? Because the person selected will also be facing a man with solid principles when they face Jagmeet Singh.

The turban makes this man a target for political hacks and racists, but it does not target him with anyone with even a small degree of understanding of what a true Sikh encompasses in his spirituality.

A visible Sikh, meaning disciple, the Turbanator follows a monotheistic religion that originated in the Punjab region of South Asia in the 15th century as a reform movement within Hinduism. This faith base is now the fifth largest religion in the world.

He appears a true adherent and not a hypocrite, thus he will have inherited many good beliefs and ideals from his faith: perception of One Creator, unity and equality of all humankind, engaging in selfless service, striving for social justice for the benefit and prosperity of all, honest conduct and honest livelihood.

As a Christian I believe he has definitely ‘flipped his light switch off’ through belief in reincarnation and that doing good works prepares them for their next step in reincarnation. Sikhs are primarily Punjabis, but others have joined them in their path of life. In Canada they are an impact in political-social life. For example, presently in Surrey, BC they comprise over 22% of the population and they represent the largest Punjabi settlement outside of the Punjab itself.

As a Christian I would vote for this man ahead of Trudeau or Scheer on the basis of his character, not on the basis of what he did or did not wear upon his head. But all cultural/religious identity has become a thorny issue in Canada to put it mildly.

We have been informed by Statistics Canada that hate crimes reached an all time high in 2017 >

There is no mention of the Sikh-Hindu community in this report and the Statistic for 2018 will not be available till well after the election. But the media reports of backlash and animosity toward the community throughout 2018 have been many for a variety of claimed reasons within such reports. This is a factor that the Turbanator has had to face and must continue to do so in the 2019 running.

His character is such that he can handle the insanity of onslaught of genuine prejudice. But in doing so he has to contend with the fact that under Trudeau the Inmates are Running the Asylums of political conflict from coast to coast.

The case of Liberal debris has been scattered about in the immigration issues and a report from Mid-August draws attention to this fact. >

From the report: “Canadians are generally supportive of current immigration levels, a survey of public perceptions commissioned by the federal government suggests. But they are also worried and confused when it comes to the issue of asylum seekers.”  During 2018 the worries and social unrest increased proportional to economic pressures on the average Canadian and facts surrounding reality of immigration and migrants came to awareness.

From the report: “Most participants said they believe immigration has a positive effect on Canada, on the country’s economic prospects and on “shaping Canada’s cultural mosaic,” the study found.

Some respondents, however, expressed doubt about the fairness of the system, considering the influx of people who have been entering Canada at unofficial border crossings since 2017 in order to apply for asylum.” In 2018 the average Canadian did not express any great dissatisfaction toward the cultural mosaic of the Nation, but social unrest was greatly increased toward the specific sector of Islamic immigration and its negative effects upon all aspects of our society. Being bombarded with economic stress and deliberate programs of disinformation surrounding immigrants and migrants the pot boiled over in many areas of the nation.

Canadian political leadership and policies were easily attributable for the fears and concerns of the average Canadian surrounding the very basics of their life and core social values they had been born into. By the end of this year people were simply no longer going to tolerate the political garbage being foisted upon them and thus we saw the December 8, 2018 protests on capitol hill and across the nation. Since then the unrest has only escalated and Joe Citizen as postal workers, truckers, miners or oil men have shown their displeasure through protesting a government that is creating the chaos that has overshadowed their lives.

From the report: “A perception exists that so-called “irregular” migrants are exploiting the system to get express entry into Canada and that security procedures are being compromised as a result, the survey found.

Concerns were also expressed about the impact of immigration on Canada’s social safety nets, such as social services, as well as public safety and job security.”  Throughout 2018 the matter of immigration concerns undoubtedly took the Burnt Beaver Award among Canadian concerns with the climaxing ceremony being the Global Compact on Migration that Trudeau signed us onto. Even hard-core human rights violators such as Egypt’s President Adbul Fattah al-Sisi could see the stupidity of such action. In a very shocking manner for a Muslim dictator he even outlined clearly why Muslims should not be permitted entry into any Nation in the manners they have been. In particular eye-opening is the fact he states no Muslim has the right to enter a host country and demand the nation provides them all the benefits of a citizen.

In December 2018 the man stated: “You are mad at the leaders of the European countries – the leaders of England, Germany, Italy, etc., who close their borders to protect the fruit of many long years of hard work and effort that went into building their evolved society.

“You want them to open their doors so we can go there and demand [that they accommodate] our own culture there? [Should we think we have the right to] demand our own [work ethic/] culture [there] which is different from the work ethic and [culture] upon which these countries were built on? Of course not!

As for those who close the door to us, we have no one to condemn but ourselves.” Read it and listen to it in Arabic if you desire. >     

Even Adbul Fattah al-Sisi does not condone the actions of leadership displayed by Trudeau, seeing such display as nothing more than thoughtless disdain in protecting the people within his own nation.

So, we truly are swimming around in a sea of deliberate disinformation and manipulation by a Liberal government and a Conservative quackery that has become embedded with reactionary political hacks. And the average Canadian is now so nauseated with government spin and the waste of taxpayer dollars they find themselves willingly entering the throes of a country verging on anarchy and extreme violence displays.

This is the world that you expect the Turbanator to someway rectify from his perch in the NDP? How is Jagmeet capable of dealing with and altering such facts as our having a non-citizen, a foreign Pakistani national and supporter of the communist group Antifa named Nimra Amjab running in a Canadian election?  Rebel >

Human Rights Day was celebrated in December. The Turbanator believes strongly in human rights as his Sikh traditions have instilled it within him to do so. How will he now address the political body of Islam within the Nation when the followers of Islam believe it is a ‘human right’ for them to jihad? Jihad not a “human right” >  Facing such a major battle with few or no troops along side him in the Commons who can he turn to for support and allegiance?

On 21 Dec 2018 we heard Crawford Killian state the NDP and Greens needed to merge provincially in BC in their current partnership in a marriage of convenience.

The New Democrats are going steady under Premier John Horgan and Green leader Andrew Weaver.

The belief was stated a formal merger of the parties, with the right platform, could hold its own against the right-wing coalition calling itself the Liberals.

But if they stick with the newly vindicated status quo, they can expect some privately funded coalition will always beat another privately funded coalition, while the voters are offered an empty choice of masters in the name of democracy. 

If they want to win under first-past-the-post, they need to tie the knot and they had better fall in love very fast.”

Is this somehow indicative that the Turbanator should look for marital union on the Federal level with ‘dancing around the political may pole of madness Elizabeth?

It may be indicative in the minds of moral midgets but it will never enter The Turbanator world as his moral fortitude and character could never encompass it.


Green with Envy? – Elizabeth May

At age 65 a love-struck Elizabeth May is getting married.

Following on the heels of Travis Patron as the person with the least leadership appeal in Canadian politics is the winner of the Millennial Burnt Betty Beaver Award. She is the Queen of Self Demeaning Behavior and recently so love struck she now has difficulty remembering that the Speaker of the House ordered her ten years ago to wear Attends in Ottawa. He apparently did so on the grounds they could no longer afford the expense of trying to cover over her drunken public behavior, nor desired to continuously replace her seat covering in the House at ongoing public expense.

As to being so love struck for the first time in her life, I must say, come on Dizzy Lizzy, what about your great love for the killer Omar Khadr? Aw, come on ‘Here We Go Loopy-de-Loop Liz’, 

“You gotta’ be kiddering around with us”. > –

“Green party Leader Elizabeth is engaged and is making plans for a wedding next spring. May spoke to reporters outside the B.C. Supreme Court, in Vancouver on Monday, May 28, 2018. May says she and John Kidder will be married in Victoria next April 22 and are planning a train trip from Vancouver to Ottawa shortly afterwards as their honeymoon. 

She said the couple have known each other for about five years, but the sparks flew at a Green Party convention in Vancouver in September.

Kidder, who is from Ashcroft, B.C., popped the question about a month later.

“I had a crush on him, and he had a crush on me,” said May, who represents the B.C. riding of Saanich-Gulf Islands in the House of Commons. “It was kind of like high school.”

She said once the pair decided they were an item the proposal came quickly.

“When you know it’s right, it’s right. Whirlwind,” she added.”

Well Liz, it may be your ‘second childhood high school sweetheart’ Kidder has been chewing on the family hops for two long or at age 71 genuine senility has set in.

He appears to not recall what the Canadian public can never forget- your political embrace and support of Islamic terrorists and your drunken public performance in displaying it. 

Setting aside your overall Betty the Beaver appearance, these two facts alone would have ensured a normal man of the earth would have continued to keep a lot of dirt between you two. He certainly would not be marrying you on Earth Day if his memory cells were sparking correctly. I guess at age 65 you don’t care what the catch is with your bent hooks dragging in the political waters for so long eh? Pretty long between any serious tugs on your lines be they political or physical, eh Lizzy girl?

Why can’t he recall as posted on June 29, 2015 – Don’t Swallow Khadr Ka-Ka Canada

We extract the following for his recall:

A variety of squirrels called Canadian politicians dance around the political May pole…..with bleeding hearts and camel snot dropping like nuts from their mouths. From the ‘Moronic Mush of Mulclair’ to the ‘Jerk Off Foments of Justin Trudeau” (Son of Mad Maggie and Fuddle-Duddle) we find so many cracked media shells of desperate ‘pleads to lead’ they block the pathway through the forest of Canadian political sanity. Now, with the ‘lullaby of Omar’ sweetly serenading the Canadian public I have chosen to exemplify the ‘looney leadership’ through one squirrel that has spun completely out of control and off the rails of reason in her attempt to utilize the issue for political gains. We now present to you, the Queen of the Canadian Political May Pole Dancers….our very own, green with envy…. twit-twat, tree hugging Elizabeth May. If you do not get a ‘chuckle as you see this squirrel buckle’ from chewing on a bad batch of Omar Khadr nuts then perhaps you need check the husks you have packed into your own fat cheeks.

Are you prepared for the election rumble Canada?

“May sparked controversy when she wrapped up a rambling and overly partisan speech to the crowd of Parliament Hill journalists and politicians with a shout-out to Omar Khadr, who was freed on bail last week pending an appeal of his U.S. conviction on terrorism charges.

“Omar Khadr, you’ve got more class than the whole f–king cabinet,” May said, referring to the Conservative Party, as Conservative MP and Transport Minister Lisa Rait tried to usher her off the stage. Raitt intervened multiple times and attempted to persuade May to end her speech, but instead, May played a recording of Welcome Back, Kotter, the theme song from a 1970s sitcom.”

From the start May has been very adept at ‘lapping up Islamic crap’ and party to foisting it upon the nation through efforts and associations that made even Iranians consider her a ‘clown show’. So, we end Elizabeth’s bit on this platform with her theme song from October 2008: “Does Your Chewing Gum Lose Its Flavor On The Bedpost Overnight?” > 3:46

 Seven years is a long time Dizzy Lizzy to be trying to market your ‘favorite flavor’ to the Canadian public. Sleep deprivation? Nope! You simply have a recurring case of Islamic Sleeping Sickness that will ultimately be contained permanently by the burqa you periodically don. And, do not go calling for the WHO (Woman’s Hormonal Organization) to excuse your ‘media misfire’ during the Gunfight at the Omar Khadr Corral when it is quite obvious you are in advanced state of ‘political mental menopause’.…/the-green-party-akbar-manoussi-and-iran


No, Tin Lizzy, it will take more than delusion, illusion or sparks flying off your ‘honeymoon train tracks ‘Ottawa bound with the Hops Man to blind anyone to the reality of your character and what you truly are.

Perhaps the Nation will be spared the disgrace of seeing your face raised anymore as that of a supposed Canadian political party leader. Maybe CNR will rise to the fore with just one more train derailment and we will only have to face the cost of a final funeral expense, and whoever is current Speaker can then remove the Standing Order you are not allowed in Ottawa without Attends. Try to remember to bring one for the Hops man as he obviously is unable to remember to bring them himself, eh?

In the Whirlwind of Romance, hopefully we shall now see you repealed and pulled back from public office just like foolishness of green policy is, given its position justly deserved in Ontario and the Green Energy Repeal Act >

Your life is in visible burn out Elizabeth May. You are spiritually smoking, sparking and falling apart in pieces just like the windmill in the video. Your impending marriage is but one more piece falling to the ground. Self-conception of delusional errant definition of love is a terrible price to pay for simple company in old age.

I doubt that anyone of serious political intent in Ottawa has any desire to talk with you about your marriage or anything else that might come out of your mouth.

I know Mad Max stated in interview at the time of his party launch ‘that you had agreed not to talk politics with him’. The interviewer stated in reporting – they agreed they won’t speak politics.

That must have come as a great relief to the Albertan from Quebec given the scriptural commands:

Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words.  (Proverbs 23:9)

Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.  (Proverbs 26:4)

If a wise man contends with a foolish man, whether he rage or laugh, there is no rest.  (Proverbs 29:9)

You unknowingly did a good thing Elizabeth, you saved Mad Max a test of obedience to God. I don’t think he would have failed Elizabeth through talking politics with you and I am certain you did not realize how you were truthfully branding yourself through agreement.

God works in funny ways teaching us the lessons of his demand to Holiness.

But, above all Elizabeth, I know the person that is the most ecstatic at your impending nuptials, now that your mind is focused on Mr. Forgetful. That man is the Turbanator, for he thinks he will no longer have to see that pitiful look on your face and your finger raised trying to get his attention.

You could never get his attention to partner with you either in or out of the House of Commons. His character and beliefs simply deny him the capability of doing that.

The only parliamentary leader of similar stance he could possibly draw along side is that of Maxime Bernier. Both are for people ahead of party and both have no desire to see the political chaos continue onward.

As with all matters the Turbanator will ultimately reach the decision on his own.

Elizabeth, many people are wondering what the Green with Envy party ‘will do for leadership after Elizabeth May inevitably retires now that she has found true love’.

But it does not matter what comes crawling along to fill the gap as genuine qualities of leadership have never been a requirement for your job.

May the sparks fly furiously off the tracks on your last train ride to Ottawa as simply an out of control political hack.


THE LUNATIC FRINGE or Are They Somehow Better Political Alternatives?

All sorts of personages raise themselves up in such times of ‘emerging political chaos’. There is no time to waste discussing the number of fools voicing opinions in these days. Here are the good, the bad and the ugly amid the listed federal political parties in Canada . We shall only be looking at a couple of the more lucid among the ‘one band wonders’ that are trying to blow their own political horns right now. Then we shall get back on with our ‘alleged closet skin head Travis Patron’.

Tim Moen, Libertarian Party of Canada – Josh Sigurdson/WAM (World Alternative Media)- >  The interview projects a personable, quite knowledgeable, concerned  Canadian, but one with a naïve view that ‘nationalism is simply globalism on a slightly smaller scale’. You will hear him express many good things about Bernier and then go on to almost ‘contradict himself’ at times.

You will see that he considers himself as being a great champion of liberty and freedom and considers himself as being ‘more principled’ than Maxime Bernier. But he exposes himself as egocentric in such expressions through statement of the desire for a merger with Bernier while acknowledging it will not take place because of his ‘negative’ comments surrounding the Peoples Party of Canada.

All you need ask yourself is why would Moen want to merge with someone he considers less ‘principled than himself’? Reality speaks through his words that he knows it is only possible through the ‘popularity of Bernier’, as seen in his rapid Party growth, that there is any hope of ‘dethroning Trudeau’. He knows explicitly he has no genuine hope of any serious impact as a separate Libertarian espousing Party of even getting himself elected within his own community.

Tim Moen simply wants a chance at being a ‘bit player of some sort in the Canadian political milieu’ while believing that he should be its reigning King. Ultimately, he does not make a good team player concerned with the ultimate public good, but tends more toward being a closeted ‘political hack’. He could have ridden into Ottawa on the coattails of Maxime Bernier if he had thrown himself full bore into genuine support of the man at the first opportunity in the best interests of Canada. Maybe he will yet truly grasp this fact and genuinely serve the best interests of the nation whether he attains an elected office or not.

Tim however, is not a white supremacist or any form of racist, but he is just a little to ‘flaky’ in policy expressions to be other than a ‘voter distraction’. In reality, a vote for Moen in his present condition is a vote for Trudeau for it removes that vote from Maxime Bernier who can send Trudeau back to the slime pit that birthed him.

Steven J.  Garvey, National Citizens Alliance, the Calgary based anti-Immigration Party was spoken about in Chapter Five.  He posted a video to prepare our Nation for his declared Oppose the United Nations Day Rally on December 8, 2018 in Edmonton. You can access it and other postings with this mans points of view on his website >

Listening to Garvey we hear a man that states many things that sound similar to the claims made by both Tim Moen and Travis Patron, but the great difference is that Patron normally only alludes or generalizes. This man gives documented facts. He is not simply some alarmist but deserves your time listening. He is very much ‘up to date’ and not simply an electronically educated university theorist or bitcoin speculator. Listen and consider the mans thinking patterns.

And, as with Tim Moen we see another attempt to create a ‘political movement’, but one that is very specific with respect to what they will implement. Knowing what you do in matters Patron and what you have heard in this video by Garvey decide who you would vote for if only these two men were on a ballot. Also, decide who you would vote for if only Garvey and Moen were on the ballot.

If Moen, Garvey and Patron were the only ballot contenders who would rank highest as the worst possible choice for Prime Minister of Canada? How would you compare any one of these three with the option of electing Maxime Bernier?

Given our efforts to reach ‘sentence’ in our case of Travis Patron we shall carry on using Maxine Bernier as a standard from which to determine judgement of ‘office qualifications’ of the Kid from Redvers.



By mid August 2018 I was heavily at odds with both the Conservative display through Scheer and the Nazi aroma emitting off the Canadian Nationalist Party. The driving factor with me was how to employ them in whatever manners I could to ensure the demise of Trudeau and his Islamic horde in Canada.

The Conservatives in general were a natural direction to look for support in any manner against the Liberal mess, but the Conservative leadership race had continued to display people with too many leadership flaws to be taken seriously. At the time I paid little attention to Bernier and believed as far as restoring sanity to law and order in the country that Steven Blaney was the best qualified man for the job. With my focus upon Trudeau and Islam neither Scheer or Bernier were raising my expectations for the necessary legal enforcement leadership the Nation required. As to the pair? I simply found Bernier more pleasant a personality with some specific policy directions and Scheer flatly left me feeling repulsed. I prayed, left the leadership matter in the hands of God and carried on tracking Islam in Canada and Internationally.

Events placing me on the ‘highway to hell’ with Travis Patron have already been spoken to. At the time of Bernier’s announcement August 23, 2018 of his withdrawal from the CCP, I was doing everything I could to keep Patron reacting to events that would further disclose his character, mindset and Nazi stench.

So, with the Bernier announcement on August 23, 2018 I sent Travis Patron on a ‘wild goose chase’ surrounding himself and Mad Max. I immediately messaged Patron stating he should contact Bernier stating “it’s obvious why you should get into contact – call and tell him to join the CNP”.  The following day I once again reminded Patron to ‘get into contact with him’.

Bouncing off the walls of his own political world Patron finally contacted me September 10 at 8:14 a.m. that he had done so.

Among the things stated were: “I had the opportunity to jump on the phone last week to discuss the current political climate in Canada with ex-conservative Maxime Bernier.

We discussed his new party, immigration policy, and future correspondence moving forward regarding the Canadian Nationalist Party.

Maxime was aware of our party. He already knew who we were, who I was, and he was familiar with our platform.”

“He mentioned that the Safe Third Country Agreement needs to be respected, which I agreed with.”

 “If Maxime is intending on distancing himself and competing with the Conservative Party, I believe a more hardline stance on immigration would be in his interest. From what I have heard after travelling around the country and meeting with Canadians, is that limited immigration is one of the most desired political stances.”

As far as I know, the Canadian Nationalist Party is the only political party advocating for a dramatic reduction in immigration. We are also the only political party to vocally endorse deportation of illegal immigrants.

I floated the idea of meeting with Mr. Bernier for a face-to-face discussion on immigration next time I am in Quebec. He seemed open to it.

As more details emerge around this potential partnership, I will keep our email list informed.”

I have found it was increasingly easier to prod the Kid from Redvers into reactionary mindsets as events progressed onward in relationship with him. Stress and tension made it apparent the man was mentally disintegrating.

But Patron is truly delusional stating “as more details emerge around this potential partnership” as having any probability at all in the world of Bernier. Maxime is an astute politician with his finger on the pulse beat of the Nation’ and most certainly would have known who Travis Patron was from the Charlottesville-Toronto meeting fiasco. How much ‘time or attention’ he may have given Patron and what he may have discussed to what purpose you would have to ask Bernier. One cannot place confidence in the lucidity of Patron nor the veracity of his statements. With the mental state Patron exhibits I had even questioned if the call to Bernier had even taken place. However, the same day the Globe and Mail reported: “Earlier this week Bernier took a call from the Canadian Nationalist Party, a far-right organization which advocates for low immigration numbers, banning burqas and deporting asylum seekers. The party’s leader reportedly asked Bernier to take a more hardline stance on immigration. Bernier reportedly told them he would not change his plans and declined to meet with them.”

This is the Bernier that Patron claimed ‘seemed open to meeting with him face to face to discuss immigration’. This is the Bernier that Patron was going to provide more details on as they ‘emerge around this potential partnership’. This is the Bernier that ‘told them he would not change his plans and declined to meet with them.”

And this is just more reason why I state that with Patron you must be very careful in trying to separating out delusions from lies. I think he passed the point sometime prior that even questioned the fact that what he was speaking might not be truth.

I guess this does not matter however with respect to Bernier, as with the founding of the Peoples Party of Canada he was determined to keep a ‘clean machine from the onset’. Maxime is not naive in any manner and knows that white supremacists and unsavory political types of all sorts are constantly trying to find their way into political influence.

He showed this clearly when the matter of the white supremacist Adam Strashok involvement with the Federal Conservatives via Jason Kenney came to light.  At the time Kenny was contending for leadership of the United Conservative Party of Alberta he had employed Strashok to run his call centre during the UCP’s leadership contest. Through online media outlets Ricochet and Press Progress it was revealed Strashok had posted anti-Semitic and white supremacist messages on social media sites and was involved in an online store that sells memorabilia glorifying white minority-rule in Rhodesia. Among other things, the store sells T-shirts emblazoned with “Let’s slot floppies,” Rhodesian military slang for “Let’s shoot black insurgents.”

Kenney, said he was “shocked and disturbed” by the reports, that he’d been unaware of Strashok’s “extreme views” and had instructed party officials to revoke his membership. But Strashok was actively involved with the Federal Conservatives until August, when Bernier split with the Conservatives to form his own party.

There was no connection whatsoever between Bernier and Strashok but it was events such as these that led Bernier to earn the full title of Mad Max, exiting as he stated the Conservative Party was “too intellectually and morally corrupt.”

Patron, are you so foolish as to think this man would be possibly considering a ‘potential partnership’ with you? I am glad that you have not yet absolutely choked to death on your cloud of ‘goose feathers’ if it means there is the remotest possibility you still may repent.

Whatever, Bernier has made it clear there will be no known ‘white supremacists or extremists of any type within the Peoples Party of Canada. And, in particular he determined they would not squirm in through organizational doorways as they had done with Jason Kenny.

No White Supremacists >

At a People’s Party of Canada rally, Maxime Bernier said the man Strashok is not involved in the party — and white supremacists in general aren’t welcome within party ranks.  

“We want to have people who believe in our philosophy and our principles, and we have a different position on immigration … we’re not for mass immigration but at the same time we’re not anti-immigrant,” he said.

Bernier said they do background checks and look at people’s social media before they can be a part of the People’s Network executive. 

“People who don’t share our values aren’t welcome in our party,” he said. “We want to have serious people on the board of our riding association because we’re a serious party.”

In a bid to insulate itself from extremists, the People’s Party is asking all members of its riding associations across the country to sign a pledge promising that they “have done or said nothing in the past and will do or say nothing in the future that would embarrass the party.”

Bernier has been determined to keep a ‘clean machine from the onset’ and in particular to prevent his EDA’s and riding association leadership from being victimized as were the Conservatives in the Catherine Major – Hughes Bonneau fiasco. On November 4, 2018 he put forth the Party Officials Non-Embarrassment Pledge >

The pledge was part of measures being enacted “to make sure people who have done weird things in the past, or done bad things in the past, will stay away from us,” PPC spokesperson Martin Masse told CBC News.”

For certain with the criteria of weirdness the Kid from Redvers will have to keep his distance from Bernier under such a policy, as will Elizabeth May and Andrew Scheer.

The pledge is a requirement for leadership only and requires every riding association functional leadership member to provide a resume, a criminal record check and list of social media accounts. It warns that a “specialized firm” will do background checks on everyone signing the pledge.

But Martin Masse said that vetting system applies only to riding-association board members, “not to our 32,000 members or to the thousands of people who’ve been attending a meet-up or commenting on Facebook.”

However, he added: “We’ve always been very clear that anyone with extreme views was not welcome in the party.”

“Mr. Bernier has been very clear since the beginning that he will not let groups of people who do not share the values and principles he has been defending for more than a decade hijack the party.” So, rest assured social media accounts of those desiring leadership functional placement will be examined as Bernier knows first hand the impact social media is having in politics. He is aware and prepared to deal with it to keep his party as clean as humanly possible in this day and age.

When it comes right down to it the pledge is simply a measure to try and get leadership in every aspect of a political party to employ common sense and decency in everything they do. That really is what Bernier is drawing people’s attention toward through this measure and in doing so is unabashedly applying it first to himself.

Time will tell us if his example has any effect upon the people who have hastily jumped to oppose his calls for reform.

Meanwhile Travis Patron carries on his wild goose chase seeking media popularity. We must assume he only does this in ‘business dress casual’ as it is a requirement for meeting with him once you have purchased a ticket.

Travis Patron through his actions makes it very difficult not to employ sarcasm.



The Kid from Redvers is singing a pathetic song calling out for the love of the media, looking for popularity ‘with and through’ Media Mastiffs in a desperate bid to attain his political goals and personal needs.  >

Patron appears a man in dire straits crying out on the one hand for some form of approval while on the other attempting to gain some measures of controlling circumstance in his life that drove him to the condition he is now within. What caused this state of being will emerge fully as we venture into future chapters.

Now, both Bernier and Patron have some issues with the media be it the big corporate tax-scavengers like the CBC or the “small wanna’ be big brigade” of the Rebel under Ezra Levant.

CBC bias is highly evident, but they are literally forced to interview Bernier because of his ‘political notoriety’, past record of political public service and swelling popularity. They have no need to direct attention toward Patron as he has no past record of political public service and the ‘skinny white supremacist’ has not even had the courage to show himself ‘a rising star’ in any arena of political necessity.

The fact remains that rising popularity with the masses of people ultimately dictates where the bulk of media must focus some attention whether they report from ‘an unbiased base or not’. So, the simple factor of an individual’s popularity can demand the media focus and organizations have arisen to statistically determine ‘popularity rating’. The truth seen about Travis Patron as a ‘popular figure’ is dismal at best.

 “Popularity tracking > Countable Data Brief” is tracked by us since July, 2015.

Travis Patron has the lowest Google PageRank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. We found that is poorly ‘socialized’ in respect to any social network. According to Siteadvisor and Google safe browsing analytics, is quite a safe domain with no visitor reviews.”

I guess ‘business dress casual’ is not enough to garner the media attention and popularity Patron longs for. Perhaps he needs to call out to the Muslim community through the social media in similar fashion to Scheer


I have located few actual interviews with Travis Patron. He basically first comes to attention through the hub bub over his attempt to hold a rally in Toronto during the time of the Nazi-white supremacist incidents that occasioned at Charlottesville. 

However, there is copious tooting of his own horn through self-promoting Party video productions of his own, locatable on his web site and YouTube.

In attempting to get a true gauge of his interaction with what we consider reporting-interview media some interesting factors came to light. Interviews conducted by Alex Van Hamme of Free Bird Media and Donald Doucette, contributor to the Council of European Canadians are made to appear as being independent journalists seeking him out as a pertinent news story. In actuality they are associates of Patron with the same general views on the topics and supporters of his camp. They are not truly interviewing, but are in fact presenting prejudiced infomercials basically designed to benefit Patron. We shall take a look at such media buddies and the presentations to show them in their true light. As well, I found some very damaging facts surrounding Patron’s character during the media hunt which I will be pointing out.

First, Donald Doucette, a media ‘associate’ of Patron contributed two items to the Council of European Canadians (CEC) to bring him awareness amid a group that would potentially be supportive of his cause. The Council of European Canadians calls themselves Eurocanadians and espouse the belief that “Canada is a nation created by individuals with an Anglo/French/European heritage, not by individuals from diverse races and cultures. As Eurocanadians, we will not be arguing in favour of multiculturalism as a minority to advance our group rights, but we will be arguing within multiculturalism in order to make Europeans aware that they are the founding peoples and that Canada is their homeland and that we intend to keep the country majority European.” This fits Patron like spandex does the butt of a three-hundred-pound woman in a Walmart checkout.

The first item contributed was in January 2018, an advisement of > What Eurocanadians Must Do To Succeed In 2018  The article was submitted through Ocean Drive which is a platform reserved within CEC for young writers from all walks of life. The platform has the claimed objective of providing them the means to publish their views free from the tyranny of political correctness.

While there is a high degree of ‘tyranny of political correctness’ underway in Canada, being employed as a blanket trying to smother free speech, the claim is duplicitous as being applied by the white supremacists such as Doucette. Such a claim is like the ill-fitting top that doesn’t cover the disgusting globs of jiggling fat on our gluttonous girl in the Walmart checkout. As you stretch the cloth one way to try to cover her up, you only make disgusting racist flesh more visible elsewhere on such a body politic. Such it is with Patron political adjustments.

And, it does not matter which side of the Walmart girl you find yourself on. But consider yourself blessed if your checkout line moves so fast that you are not the one confronted with the thong and sweaty crack of her ass. You may be ‘blinded by the sight, wrapped up like a douche, another roller in the night’ and be led by Doucette and Patron out the door to load her goodies into the gaping mouth of their SUV called white supremacism.

The tactics of required action proposed by Doucette have been underway with Patron since he started on his catwalk. But, as Doucette states: “In terms of Federal parties, there are several potential candidates. The unfortunate reality is that no matter who we back, we will likely lose.

Currently there are several parties that have policies which could benefit Eurocanadians. These include The Alliance of the NorthChristian Heritage Party and The National Advancement Party. That said, I am of the opinion that our best bet would be the Canadian Nationalist Party (CNP, 2018)”

This is the first mention of the Kid from Redvers and Doucette states: “In these cases, choose the party which most closely resembles the nationalist goals. I am open to supporting other parties but right now this is the one I see working the best.”

Remember this all is being directed through the ‘youth platform’ and that one and all should be able to recognize him as best choice for ‘leader of the pack’.

This is simply Patron’s bid for office as being best choice for supreme commander of white supremacist neo-Nazi hideouts crawling into the Canadian political scene in preparation for election 2019.

As we already know he has failed miserably in many areas of his leadership bid since coming on to the scene.

 The second posting was the supposed > Interview With Travis Patron, Leader Of The Canadian Nationalist Party of April 12, 2018.

This was in no manner was an interview. It was a prepared carefully crafted set of questions that were answered in a manner with a clarity and conciseness you never see in any free flow Patron dialogue. It is nothing more than a ‘Patron Party Propaganda Push’ (PPPP) for support, right to the point of soliciting memberships to try to be able to get the party registered.

It is not shown as being submitted through the youth platform of Ocean Drive. The introductory doorway through the youth has been employed to establish exactly why Patron should be considered the best candidate by the general adult populace of white supremacists in the Nation.

This is one manner in which Patron employs his ‘media associates’.

I found nothing posted by Doucette in Patron’s behalf since this PPPP leadership bid. You may be asking why?  In all likelihood the disastrous leadership display of Patron we evidenced at the July 28, 2018 Belgian Club Winnipeg rally of the CNP is the cause. I believe it has Doucette and other Patron ‘media associates’ now distancing themselves from his ineptitudes or seriously considering abandoning him altogether.  

The Disappearing Cameron

Do you recall the issue of the Ronnie Cameron interview raised at Winnipeg?

Omar Kinnarath complained of Patron’s Nazi supremacist association with Ronny Cameron as displayed through his interview of June 24, 2018 >

The interview was obviously still available at the time of the Winnipeg Rally on July 28, 2018 and our encounter with the Two Mouths most vehemently opposed to Patron.

Shortly after the Winnipeg Rally sequence I attempted to locate all information I could surrounding Ronnie Cameron and the podcast referred to.

The advertisement for the podcast was still online, but the content itself had been pulled and made unavailable. It appears nothing less than blatant attempt to downplay association of the men in relationship to what the interview displayed in regard to their common Nazi mindset, as it was the Nazi connection that had Kinnarath and his group so visibly angry.

Ronnie Cameron is a ‘Toronto Tootsie’ and if you listen to the link below you will see he titles himself an ‘identitarian’ and this is what Patron is trying to hide his association with. >

Cameron could possibly be titled the “King of Ghetto Builders” as he advocates redistribution of populations into major cities based on race, color and sexual orientation.

If you desire to see how fully Ronnie Cameron ‘mind melds ideologically’ with Patron go to his podcast ‘The Death of White America’. >

Made available November 21,2018 it appears ‘rock and roll them’ Ronnie was firing up the troops for Election 2019. You can check him out fully on his web site where you will see he is not afraid to ‘take it into the streets’ to defend his beliefs, to physically stand up for his ideas whether facing Antifa or anyone else. This is where he certainly parts company with Patron.

Time shall tell if he remains any form of ‘media associate’ after the cowardly leadership display of Travis Patron on December 8,2018.

The Ronnie Cameron issue at Winnipeg simply reinforced the facts that Travis Patron is a Nazi based white supremacist and a liar. Neither he nor his remaining media associates can hide such facts no matter how they try to manipulate internet content.

The ‘Mr. Poutine’ NO GO SHOW

This is the man referred to in the Winnipeg Rally videos as JF.

Jean-François ‘JF‘ Gariepy is a French Canadian, a YouTuber and Scientist.

 JF has a PhD ​in Neuroscience ​and worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Duke University.

This ‘morally brain-dead source’ of social sickness is very prominent within Alt-right circles and actively promotes ‘race realism’. Of anyone encountered thus far, this Gariepy is the prime example of the moral degeneracy and lunacy that encompasses the inhabitants of Patron’s political world.

The Associated Press has stated:

“The ‘alt-right’ or ‘alternative right’ is a name currently embraced by some white supremacists and white nationalists to refer to themselves and their ideology, which emphasizes preserving and protecting the white race in the United States in addition to, or over, other traditional conservative positions such as limited government, low taxes and strict law-and-order. The movement has been described as a mix of racism, white nationalism and populism … it criticizes “multiculturalism” and more rights for non-whites, women, Jews, Muslims, gays, immigrants and other minorities. Its members reject the American democratic ideal that all should have equality under the law regardless of creed, gender, ethnic origin or race.

In 2016 he Columbia Journalism Review stated ‘there is no formal organization and it is not clear if the alt-right can be considered a movement’: “Because of the nebulous nature of anonymous online communities, nobody’s entirely sure who the alt-righters are and what motivates them. It’s also unclear which among them are true believers and which are smart-ass troublemakers trying to ruffle feathers”. 

JF is much more than just a ‘smart-assed trouble maker’. He is one sick, perverted son of a bitch actively promoting a format of pedophilia through preying upon mentally retarded people.

I forewarn you that the next link takes you to perhaps one of the ‘roughest most disturbing autobiography presentations I have ever encountered. I also inform you that what is presented in this link is verifiable through other resource listings. This is exactly the nature of one of Patron’s alt-right media associates. >  Jean-Francois Gariepy – Encyclopedia Dramatica

Now, at the time in 2017 when Travis Patron was starting to feel severe heat of public scrutiny this JF was dealing with his own licking flames. In late 2017, it was revealed that JF had previously been engaged in a relationship with a 19-year-old woman with Autism ​, who was declared by psychiatrists as mentally retarded. JF had even put in an appeal in court to allow him to date and continue having sex with this girl, who was deemed as having the mind of a 10 to 11-year-old child.” This is but one of the mans deviant sexual manifestations classifying him as basically a sexual predator.

Patron initially scheduled himself to do an interview with JF on June 1, 2018. This link advertises such fact. >    

But it appears Patron fled from additional public exposure at the time and I am uncertain if they ever managed an interview subsequent. This is the JF statement surrounding the absentee Patron.   >

The man disdainfully states that ‘Canada is a dead country’.

You can access the complete Gariepy Garbage Can through JFG Livestreams if you desire. You may just turn up some interview that has been electronically buried by the pair.

As for me: “Birds of a feather flock together and I am putting a lid on the Patron-Gariepy alt-right crap.”

Hiding Out Heroically?

So, Patron was jumping around trying to avoid exposure and exercise whatever damage control he might in his bid for supreme leader of the alt-right unrighteous. He was not avoiding JF because of moral conflict or ideological differences. He was simply trying to cover his own ass and secure positioning in the ranks he desired to lead.

Patron has tried to portray himself as being a man with The Fighting Spirit and prepared to make whatever sacrifice necessary for the nation and his cause. He did it once again on November 18, 2018 with this posting, but a short time precedent to a repeating performance of his Nazi induced cowardice. 

The entirety of this web page post:

What I can say with certainty about the character of the CNP: it is not enough to simply believe, one must also fight for what they believe.

“At various periods in the timeline of a nation, sacrifice must be made by those who believe in its founding. Without this investment of spirit on behalf of the folk of the nation, the body politic itself will wither and die.

We must avoid this end at all costs – and therefore the founding ideal must be indisputable and indestructible.

The CNP recognizes and honors people of all backgrounds. This experience however, requires us to understand that we are in a game of sorts, and the objective is to simply survive.

We will not surrender. We will not capitulate. We will fight!”

So, we hear a certain determination to fight on behalf of the folks of the nation, to fight in their behalf without surrender or capitulation. Now, in Patron’s Bitcoin induced brain a capitulation frequently occurs after a security or a market has endured a long, downward slide in value; it is in essence the final act of hitting bottom.

Patron had already hit a spiritual bottom by this time and his actions are those of a man whose primary objective is to simply survive.

On December 2, 2018 Patron issued a call to the Party adherents  For Leaderless Resistance

 “The Canadian Nationalist Party is calling for an action of leaderless resistance in opposition to the current Liberal Government over their support for the United Nations Migration Compact. The actions and representation from the Liberal Party have demonstrated that their government is failing to operate with integrity and good faith.

Since the 42nd Federal Election, Canadians have watched as Justin Trudeau has systemically eroded their charter rights of free expression and public assembly, the sovereignty of their country, their firearms rights, and vocally supported terrorism within our jurisdiction.

The conduct of this government is in violation of the Magna Carta of our British Crown. We have the right to lawfully rebel when we are being governed unfairly and unjustly.

The Canadian Nationalist Party is calling for an act of leaderless resistance until Justin Trudeau is brought to justice. We are imploring supporters of our movement to remain active within patriot groups in their community and exercise non-compliance with all levels of municipal, provincial, and federal government.

But, in his full survivor flotation jacket Patron had issued a call for rally of the troops in Ottawa for December 8, 2018 to ‘fight without capitulation’ on Parliament Hill. >  CNP – Ottawa December 2018. Issued December 3, 2018

“The Canadian Nationalist Party is rallying in Ottawa this upcoming December weekend to advance the nationalist movement in Canada and provide vocal opposition to the Liberal Government’s commitment to sign the UN Migration Compact. We believe this agreement with the UN is in violation of the will of and ultimately constructed without the consent, notice, or input of the Canadian people.

This is an event that is open to party members and ticket holders only. If you are interested in joining our event, you can register your seat on our event page.

When: December 8th, 2018
Where: Downtown Ottawa
Why: Vocally reject the Liberal Government’s commitment to sign the UN Migration Compact and recommend action in resistance to the current globalist influence within our country.”

But when the chips were down Patron was nowhere to be found. Perhaps some of the ‘leaderless troops’ were skulking about the periphery wondering where great leader was? But this is the reason Patron did not show. He is a coward in full survivor mode and knew for certainty he was going to capitulate to this. >

Always in search of media coverage our Kid from Redvers certainly could have gotten some ‘Party Exposure’ here. But as evidenced, Travis Patron is simply a piece of gutless Nazi scum.

So, stuff it where the sun never shines Travis. All thinking educated Canadians know this government is in violation of the Magna Carta and should be held legally accountable for it. How does this in any manner justify what you are and the Nazi ideology you are attempting to foster as rule?

You cannot hide out anywhere in some ‘electronic bunker’ you have created in your own mind. And as to a call for leaderless resistance? You simply are too gutless and spiritually warped to openly lead a charge for justice at the front lines. Your staged Winnipeg production proved that.

And your non-presence at the December 8,2016 protest further served to show you up for what you are. You simply feared facing the chanting crowds and knowing you would certainly be fleeing like the skin-headed long-legged cowardly dork you are when someone else is in control of the cameras. You knew this would not be another Belgian Club performance.

Entrapped as he is, Patron’s head must be throbbing insanely. Like the infamous Michael ‘Kramer’ Richards who exploded into a virulent anti-Semitic rant on stage in 2006 he appears verging on such a wobbly platform himself. 

The man has posted another call to the leaderless enclaves hiding out and rebelling in every fashion possible against government authorities >

Once again to the trenches, eh?

“The Canadian Nationalist Party is meeting in Toronto on January 12th to advance the nationalist movement in Canada and provide vocal opposition to the Liberal Government.

This is an event that is open to party members and ticket holders. If you are interested in joining our event, you can buy a ticket here: Event Page | Toronto January 2019

If you would like to support the party, but will not be able to attend, consider making a ticket purchase anyway. All revenue generated goes toward hosting future events.

The Canadian Nationalist Party is still in the process of trying to registering federally with Elections Canada and competing in the upcoming 43rd Federal Election. We plan on running candidates in various districts across the country in a bid to democratically win seats in our House of Commons.”

Once again looking for members, looking for money and still looking for the ability to even register as a political party.

But who amid the leaderless are going to be at this rally of ‘vocal resistance’ after being left high and dry in Ottawa? Certainly, our gutless Patron will be another ‘no show’, unless he has already secured a well insulated, sound proof room that his presence cannot be detected from. How will he assure the leaderless they do not have to face the Antifa chant? How is he even going to be able to assure himself of such security as he flees the reality of 2018 for the greater uncertainty of this election year?

There is little if any hope for Travis Patron as he has already placed himself on Spiritual and Political Suicide Watch.

When it comes to what is socially good for Canada, the CNP is firmly rooted in the Enemy Camp.


The only Mainline Media interview I know Patron to have participated in was from what he considers to be the enemy camp surrounding him. He has stated his animosity toward the public funded corporation, so it was interesting on June 7, 2018 when he sat down with Andréanne Apablaza of CBC Radio Saskatchewan to discuss the Canadian Nationalist Party >

As they were being wired together, he gleefully told her ‘I’m excited, I hope you are too’? Aside from protesters I have never seen Patron in the company of a woman.

After viewing Gariepy anything is possible roaming amid the alt-right crew. Patron could just be another closet queer for all I know at this juncture. But the circumstance may be so sad that this is the closest thing to a date with a real woman the Kid from Redvers has had since his momma stopped flopping him a breast.

Given the woman’s educational and work background in both Ottawa and Montreal Andréanne may have crossed paths with Patron at some point prior and she was simply inquisitive about a past acquaintance? The Apablaza clan has links in some fairly high-profile positions in Canada, but no corruption or patronage links having come screaming out at me.  And I doubt that JF could have possibly introduced the pair, eh.

Physically beautiful, intelligent and highly skilled at interviewing in French, English and Spanish she could have fired some extremely hard questions at Patron, but she seemed quite ‘merciful’ and quiet in her approach. She covered pretty much all the major questions about the CNP at the time but the only place she pressed him at all was with respect to Islam and homosexuality. She let the answers surrounding Islam slide through, but she did hit him slightly when she asked him why he had changed his stance with regard to homosexuality from a video posting he had made a year prior. The contradiction from outright rejection of homosexuality to his ‘economic reasons’ for doing such just don’t wash the ‘hogwash’ out of the line he was trying to string. He was clearly caught in a circumstance that another reporter would likely have leapt to his jugular for. It was left to slide.

With Patron’s views of the CBC why did the lady not hit him harder? Why was there not one mention of his position surrounding ‘public media’? As well, with Patron’s views regarding the CBC being public knowledge why did she do the interview at all?

If you are sitting on a jury trying to come to decision as each new piece of ‘potential evidence’ is presented you tend to factor such questions into the equation you are expected to solve.

Whatever the reasons for no CBC inquiry Patron was excited to be in the enemy camp with Andréanne Apablaza.

But following the events of December 8 on Parliament Hill everything was getting Patron easily over excited and trying to put up a smoke screen between him and his Nazi encampment. Once again, on December 16,2018 we hear him in another we’re not Nazi rants. >

Read it and please note these clips from it and my comments.

“Despite my best efforts to vocalize the intention to create an original movement within the historical and classical traditions of Canadian politics, some individuals (who seek membership within our party) seem to believe that we are attempting to pickup where the Axis Powers left off.

The historical and classical traditions of Canadian politics did not evolve through the secretive meetings, fear of physical conflict and constant excuses for inability to achieve success that you have exhibited Travis Patron. The historical and classical traditions of our ‘political path’ evolved in polar opposite to your visible measures. 

Anything positive that the Axis Powers (in particular Germany and Italy) accomplished was more than offset by the negative repercussions of these political movements. This is not an example we wish to emulate or support.

For the people hovering around the perimeter, requesting membership in our party, please know that we will not accept anyone who holds the intention of reviving these types of ideologies from WWII. Canada, and our forefathers won victoriously in WWII and I believe that is something we should be proud of.

It is a continuous task to filter out the beliefs which do not accurately reflect our party ideology. However, it is also a necessary one should the CNP find success in contemporary politics. We will employ every means necessary to ensure that all within our ranks respect and emulate the political factions of our ancestors within the jurisdiction of our country’s history rather than attempting to revive something which died in 1945.”

Actually, Travis the Nazi ideology did not die in 1945 and you are living proof of this fact. Hitler and crew were also prepared to employ every means necessary to ensure control over their rank and file as you make desperate attempts at doing. But, like Hitler hiding in his bunker, the bomb in your own head is about to explode ending all your aspirations eternally.

Patron, our forefathers won victoriously in WWII by fighting against Nazi ideology in every aspect, not by supporting it under any manner of disguise. Wake up Patron, the pride we Canadians take is the same as our forefathers, the pride is being exhibited in standing up against such men as you.

And to my knowledge I can not state there was ‘Anything positive that the Axis Powers (in particular Germany and Italy) accomplished’ as you allude to. But when you implode Travis that will not end the evil stench of Axis decay. That stench will only be eternally eradicated with the final return of the Warrior King – Jesus Christ.

And Travis, He is not coming back seeking a CBC interview, nor will he contradict himself in any manner surrounding the abomination homosexuality remains eternally in His sight.

Two interview questions for you Travis: “Why didn’t Andréanne Apablaza question you about the CBC and your media bias and laments?” and “Did you ever cross paths with her precedent to the June 7,2018 interview.?”

These are two obvious questions I would ask if I was prosecuting your case, but I am not, I am simply bringing factual evidence into the interactive Court of this book.

I already know you are guilty of being a white supremacist Nazi piglet beyond any reasonable doubt. But mine is but one vote.

We shall see by books end if there remains even a shadow of a doubt.

We shall see by books end if you have repented and surrendered to Jesus Christ.

We shall see by books end if you have been officially taken off Spiritual-Political Suicide Watch through untimely death, legal incarceration or mandatory confinement to a mental institute in their ‘business dress casual’ called a straight jacket.


Patron and his Buddies are all perched on the same rotting media branches, seemingly oblivious to their mental decay. In ascending order of rot, we have tossed a bit at you surrounding Donald Doucette, Ronnie Cameron and top of the pile Jean Francois Gariepy.

The one thing these alt-right birds all have in common is their use of our modern media technology to promote themselves and their variant deceptive white supremacist strains.

Patron was certainly swimming in very troubled waters from the time of his excited interview with Andréanne Apablaza. Inside and out of his group he was under pressure of changing political circumstance. Shortly after the CBC event he watched Bernier being removed from his Conservative front bench position by Scheer on June 12, 2018. And during these same days I was doing everything I could to keep the Kid from Redvers tottering on the barbwire fence he was clambering along.

Then on August 23, 2018 we had the simultaneous events of Bernier announcing his withdrawal from the Conservative party and the soon appearing disastrous results he faced at the Belgian Club in Winnipeg on August 28,2018. It was in-between these dates on August 23-24 that I fired off the letters to Patron that sent him on his ‘wild goose chase’. The rebuff from Maxime Bernier that followed rankled Patron, increasing his mental instability, but it did not diminish his delusional thought patterns.

With the negative results of such events as the August 28 Belgian Club rally pressing upon him, and searching for some way to stay politically afloat, on October 28, 2018 Travis turned to his ‘buddy’ Alex Van Hamme of Free Bird Media to try to get some public exposure.  >

This interview is going to be used to exemplify many things about Travis Patron, his mental state and commonalities with his ‘buds’. To more fully exemplify you could go the Van Hamme ‘Live Stream’ podcast of October 31,2018 that further exposes one and all, but I will simply give you some post references by Van Hamme that shows the inter-connecting of the crew.

Before I do, I am going to point out what I see to be the major difference between Patron and Van Hamme. I do not know the degree to which the same difference exists between Patron and the other media buddies. But this twitter-brained media man Alex is not a coward and Patron is. On December 8 in Ottawa when Patron was no where to be found, Alex Van Damme was addressing a Rally Against the UN Migration Pact in Toronto. > 

As you listen to Van Hamme you will see he connects with our alt-right political activist Ronnie Cameron.  And you can see he is ‘very excited’ as he relates to Jean Francois ‘The Predator’ Gariepy as a common reference with his audience when sharing a > post October 29 · 

It is definitely an interrelated crew, and while the factors I point out in the Free Bird Media interview with Patron speak specifically to his character, they all have commonality to a large degree in the personalities and performance factors of his buddies. 

For the full Van Hamme package, you can access Media Company | Free Bird Media


In Sound and Print

The modern mind common to the buddies is that gained in pursuit of skills in their media induced world. The pursuit has trained them to ultimately reach a stage of never being able to concentrate fully on the task at hand to the point they become basket cases. This does not occasion overnight, but It is an escalating pathway downhill that is exacerbated by their degree of variance from ‘healthy moral states’ or social mores.

We made mention chapters back that Patron had visibly disintegrated between his CBC interview in June 7, 2018 and the Free Bird Media interview of October 23,2018. So listen to the interview > > CNP Leader Travis Patron Interviews With Free Bird Media Canadian Nationalist Party  and hear just how disjointed and rambling man it is.

Then consider the following hard copy attained and extracted from his web source of the interview. Reading it will reinforce what I have stated.

Within this extract I shall be drawing attention to facts surrounding Patron, his buddies, white supremacists and Nazis in general. In the interview Travis Patron put forth his opinions about Maxime Bernier when he expressed Why Nationalism (not Libertarianism) is the Future of the Right.

Extracts from The Hard Copy:

He states Maxime: “has a lax attitude, questions what his true motivations are and if he ultimately feels beholden to himself or the people.”

“He decided to splinter off and form his own party (the PPC), and in doing so he accumulated a great deal of ire from not only his former Tory colleagues, but likewise from the rest of Canada.

He insinuates Maxime ‘is running in 2019 as a Spoiler candidate to sink the Tories and get Trudeau re-elected.’

All this is very disparaging of Bernier and essentially holds the man up as ‘working for Trudeau’ which is absolutely ludicrous. The claim of raising the ire of some of ‘some’ his former colleagues is correct, but as to raising ire from ‘the rest of Canada’ it was exactly the opposite as immediately campaign funds poured in, party memberships swelled and organizational structure emerged from coast to coast. Patron was obviously confusing the reaction, the ire he elicited from the ‘rest of Canada’ when he raised the rally attempt at Toronto and was projecting it onto Bernier like being himself. From even before Bernier enacted the PPC, the position he held and the influence he could project through Parliament were goals Patron lusted after, but for the wrong reasons.

Patron quite frequently appears to be reversing the images in his own mind with respect to himself and Mad Max. This might account for his almost immediate flip-flop to a state of praising or vindicating the man. This same behavior is exhibited as a common feature with his close media associates.

It is reasonable to conclude that his objectives are not for mere personal benefit; since that has clearly been jeopardized immensely now, and likely for several years to come. “Mad Max” stands to lose out tremendously (both personally and with regard to his overall “Legacy”), so I doubt that this move was anything but him fighting for what he believes in.

“I think this whole exercise that he has chosen to undertake is futile.”

“Maxime calls himself a “smart populist”, someone voicing growing concerns for diminished free markets, individual liberties and a return to individual responsibility.”

Patron is absolutely correct in stating the Bernier concerns ‘for diminished free markets, individual liberties and a return to individual responsibility’, but he should have added, ‘and he alone is actually actively doing something about it from what I observe coast to coast.’ But that would be a statement of truth that Patron’s psyche simply continues to block. The totality of his conscious and unconscious mind are at warfare with one another.

Now have a full uninterrupted read of what you listened to and you decide how coherent and flowing smoothly in conceptualizations and expressions of his thoughts the mind of Travis Patron is. I will make some comment at the very end.

Now, I must say that I am not entirely surprised. The “free markets and individual responsibility” sales pitch is what has (thus far) worked well for Maxime and gotten him to the top. But in this specific case, it makes for good Rhetoric, albeit comprising little substance. Bernier will appeal to Classical Liberals, Libertarian-lites and (most importantly) Civic nationalists with aforementioned sales pitch; primarily because it reinforces a core presupposition that all those groups share when it comes to making sense of culture, politics, etc. Specifically, it is the presupposition that abstract values, ideals, philosophies, etc can capture the world and make sense of it (and its sundry workings). Simply: “Reason” (Whatever that comprises for each of those aforementioned groups) can both describe the world and likewise prescribe to us how we ought to run it, how it ought to function, etc.

 But this really couldn’t be further from the truth. Hume himself noted long ago that “Reason is a Slave to the Passions”, and many others after him noted (time and again) Reason’s woeful inadequacies when it comes to telling us how we ought to live, what the “good life is”, etc. In fact, in many cases we see Reason rule in favour of positions that are totally out of sync with what our basic Intuitions, notions, etc tell us to be the case. Take for instance when Maxime tells us that “this surge is about people wanting to take back free markets and individual liberties”. Is that really the case? From a purely materialistic point of view, this seems quite obvious. Why else would the grassroots risk so much and stoke the contempt, ire, disdain, etc of the media, the bureaucracy, etc? What is to be gained by them going for “fringe” candidates, parties, etc time and again? Is this not just them trying to reassert themselves (a la taking back their individual liberties and whatnot)? At first glance, that appears to be what is going on here… but when we zoom in closer, all those illusions disappear quite rapidly. In particular, if we look at the platforms, policies, etc of those aforementioned “fringe” parties, we see the same pattern play out over and over again: Most (if not all) of them are unapologetically Nationalistic. Whether it be with regard to Border security, the economy, social issues, cultural mores, etc. Time and again, whether it be the AfD in Germany, the Centre-Right Coalition in Italy or the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands; the same message is sent by the voters in each case “We want our country back”. Individual liberties, etc are often of secondary concern at most:

Yes, still there are Civic undertones present. In the Anglosphere in particular (The UK, the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada more specifically), time and again recourse is made to emphasize that specific Abstract Values (such as freedom of speech, personal responsibility, etc) are the core objectives, pursuits, etc. Time and again we hear politicians from those areas of the world do so; emphasizing to the media, the public at large, etc that the overlap with Nationalism and Nationalist policies that occur in their respective platforms is coincidental. We are told that those pesky Nationalists pursue ethno-centrism, concern for their posterity and lineage, etc whilst our more “Enlightened” right wing pursue core foundational values of “The West” such as the dignity of the individual, free expression, etc. Civic Nationalism, Libertarianism and various other Anglospheric inventions comprise Maxime’s “smart populism”. This is but a contemporary rendition of “Patriotism knows no colour”, “All Patriots bleed red”, “True Patriotism knows no prejudice”, etc. Except in Maxime’s case (and to be fair, likewise for Libertarians in Canada and elsewhere), simply substitute the words “Patriot” and “Patriotism” with “Libertarian” and “Liberty”. This is really just another case of history not quite repeating, but rather “Rhyming”. We see once more this attempt to try and use “Reason”, Abstract Values, etc to try and replace Lived reality, experience, etc; and this has (to a certain extent) happened before. The Civic nationalists tried this project and had some limited successes in the USA. That nation is the current beacon of for said ideology, which postulates an assimilation of peoples into a common identity (regardless of place of origin), provided that said peoples learn to “think” a certain way and adopt certain values over other ones. But the American project (for all intents and pruposes) has failed. Identity politics is once more on the rise and (as things stand), it will be the deathblow for said nation. In a certain sense, the USA is no longer what it once was, nor can it go back to said state. It is simply too late into the game at this moment in time. The WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) founding peoples are rapidly declining and at most they have about 1-2 decades or so till the their nation splinters at the seams due to rapid Demographic shifts. Societies that Heterogenize too rapidly (and too much) inevitably collapse into sundry Homogenous societies once the strain (social, cultural, political, etc) of ‘diverse’ peoples living in close proximity to one another… becomes too much to bear. The USA is now nearing that path’s endgame; such are the rotten fruits of Civic Nationalism:

“When the rubber meets the road; Abstract Values, “Reason”, etc is subsumed by lived realities, experiences, etc. The fact of the matter is that lineage, tribe, kin, community, family, nation, etc are deeply ingrained in us. Even if one is not a Materialist, this fact is so obvious that it’s akin to someone telling you “the Sun will rise tomorrow”. To think that we can (or should) outgrow such basic, core drives and behaviours because of some peculiar set of “Enlightenment” Philosophies that are currently popular, is sheer nonsense and hubris on our part.” 

Thus, it ends. Have you got a clear understanding of what Patron put forth from what was said? Have you been able to relate to the logic of how he sewed his ideas together? If so, you must be one of his ‘media buddies’ as this is how they communicate with one another. That is, unless they are just reading from a carefully prepared before hand script.

Our ‘buds’ certainly screwed up here. Even the nightly news knows a teleprompter will assist and generally keep you on your media flow. I guess they have not gained enough popularity yet to raise the funds to afford one, eh?

No, Mr. Patron, your hubris is obviously the cause of your destruction. Your excessive pride or self-confidence in what you believe are your ‘superior intellectual capabilities’ is your self-destructive emotional scouring evidenced in hammering your self to a state of what is most easily described as being ‘lost memory capacity’.

And, no, Mr. Van Hamme, your chirping like a high school girl on your free flow broadcast that “I like him, I like working with him, his web site is cool, I like the guys around him” will get few but the politically insane attending the Alt-Right Highschool Dance with you and Patron.

“Before founding Free Bird Media, Alex Van Hamme worked as a stand-up comedian, landscaper, Christmas tree farmer, personal trainer, nightclub doorman, office administrator, walnut salesman, barback, journalist, and a writer. He is a graduate of Humber College, Sheridan College and Carleton University.” This is the claimed chain of activities that knocked his head about until he exhibits the condition he is found in today.

And the condition of the Canadian Nationalist party was quite evident on October 30, 2018. The Canadian Nationalist Party was still trying to garner enough signatures to finalize process of registering as a federal political party with Elections Canada.

Meanwhile, back on October 11, 2018 Bernier announced that “Yesterday was another historic day in Canadian politics. – I filed the paperwork and the signatures with Elections Canada to officially register the People’s Party.” 

Then, October 18, 2018 in a News Letter Mad Max was raising policy issues, stating that “under the Trudeau Liberals, more and more of our country’s policies are being determined not in the interest of Canadians, but in the interests of foreign countries and international organizations”.  He cited such things as “under the Paris Agreement, the Liberals are literally sending billions of dollars to developing countries to help fund climate change policies”. And he presented realistic facts, not alt-right conjectures.

On October 25, 2018 Max gave a Heads up on pollution and carbon tax, showing the futility of name changes.  “This week, Justin Trudeau unveiled what he calls his ‘pollution pricing system.’ This is the Liberals’ new marketing ploy to make their carbon tax sound more acceptable. Trudeau knows that everyone is against pollution. And he knows that most Canadians don’t want to pay more taxes and don’t believe a new tax is going to have any effect on global climate change. So instead of calling it a carbon tax, as it’s been referred to for years, it’s now officially a “pollution pricing system.”
It won’t do anything to reduce real pollution. All it will do is force you to pay more to drive your car, heat your home, and buy all kinds of products and services. But astonishingly, Trudeau claims it will make you richer.”

And astonishingly, even with truth of what Bernier was unfolding facing them like a well armed police man handing them a ‘breathalyser’, our buddies are so drunk with their own delusions they kept knocking it from the hands of reality. A very silly move at best, but then the boys are so foolish that they think Canadians will somehow buy the bottles of bootlegged Nazi sewage that fills the social media of their lives. You have to be drunk, delusional or spiritually damned to think the nation will be richer from swallowing white supremacist lies.

Maxime Bernier is the only political leader that appears truly capable and dedicated to eliminating these sorts of guys from the landscape. He has become their worst nightmare of opposition simply in pressing for truthful debate and political reform.

Thus, it was on October 31, 2018 we listened to Alex Van Hamme giving his smattering of limp dick Media Livestream followers a rambling woeful garbage criticism of Mad Max Bernier.  > ‘Discussing Maxime Bernier’s The People’s Party of Canada (PPC). A small motley crew they could not even comprehend the opponent they were already facing.

On the day following, November 1, 2018, Mad Max announced that the People’s Party of Canada membership had grown from zero to more than 31,500 members in a matter of six weeks!

So, ramble on boys and keep the yaps a flapping. The noise of hungry dogs howling and seagulls squawking over scraps of rotten fish lets one and all know exactly where they are. Who you are and the reality of your alt-right attempts to fracture society are clearly evidenced through your employment of social media and media in every format. You are being ‘hoist on your own petard’ you pack of social-political-spiritual retarded Birds.

Enjoy this musical interlude folks. It certainly shows the state of Patron and the Media Buddies.

Here is the Van Hamme call to his website >

Yep, that’s the status of our boy Alex.

And now that final late-night alt-right Media Live Stream call to the entire Bird Pack. You simply can’t hit the sack without it >

And It doesn’t matter if you are single or married the sound comes out the same. Our Liberal Family Guy Scheer makes this clear >

But to the rational Canadian, that loves our Nation, they all sound like ‘common cuckoos’. Each time you hear this sound say to hell with their white supremacist, Nazi induced and spiritually perverted social media >

This is just how insane it has become through much of ‘social media’.



Little needs to be spoken about Bernier and the media. Maxime has no problem with addressing the political issues underway whether it be questions from big or small media sources.

Here is a small sample to exemplify.

The CBC September 14, 2018 Power and Politics – Vassy Kapelos > 10:26

CPAC September 17, 2018 – Prime Time Politics – Peter Van Dusen > 9:34

CPAC November 6, 2018 – Prime Time Politics – Peter Van Dusen >

TVO – September 24, 2018 – ‘The Agenda’ -Steve Paikin >

Press For Truth – September 27, 2018 – Independent medias Dan Dicks >

Post Media November 28, 2018- Winnipeg Sun -Scott Billeck  >  Man of The People : Bernier promises big change for Canadian politics

Global News -November 30, 2018 – Jackie Wilson >  Maxime Bernier claims People’s Party of Canada true conservative choice

Certainly, Bernier has no need to plead to media, seek them out or try to manipulate them in some covert manner. Anything to do with Maxime Bernier versus Travis Patron concerning Media is as simple as Freedom versus Incarceration. Whether with individual interviewers or the inquiring minds at party rallies you get the same straight forward messages from Bernier.

This was once again evidenced on November 28, 2018 at a Winnipeg Rally > You can watch his Winnipeg speech here.  And like the man present in the Winnipeg photo Duetime Akhidime said that day: he considers Bernier to be a breath of fresh air because he always speaks his mind”.

Respecting Party growth and popularity, Bernier based reality was already summed up by November. On November 1,2018 it was announced that in six weeks time the Peoples Party had grown to 31,500 members and Maxime Bernier was having Founding Members Certificates Issued.

And from the inception of Scheer’s greatest nightmare Bernier had a massive support rising up amid common Canadians. In the 87 days from launching his Party, until time of his “Power Lunch” on November 8,2018 we know his party had raised $435,000 that was all non-tax receptible donations in amounts of 5, 10, 25 dollars. As Max stated: “Yes, its all small donations”.

Bernier has continued to reach his stated goals and it is simply due to the popularity of what he stands for and how he is taking his stand. It was thus on December 21, 2018 Bernier announced “After only three months, the People’s Party of Canada has achieved its goal of setting up Electoral District Associations in every region of the country!”

Bernier has stated that the months of January to May are those within which the Peoples Party will be looking to field truly qualified candidates within every electoral district in the Nation. It certainly looks as if 2018 has proven the people of Canada are quite capable of completing such a task.

So, I guess you might not consider it so strange when I disparage the alt-right media buddies in the manner I do.  On  October 29 Van Hamme took a quick poll and more quickly ended it. It appears it was hard for him to face up to the fact that even amid his weenie followers Bernier was preferred to his buddy Patron. And rest assured their preference for Bernier shall continue to grow due to the four founding principles of his party. Why, because none of the founding principles of Individual Freedom, Personal Responsibility, Respect and Fairness exist within the Nazi ideology. And these principles are proven the inherent longing of unfettered souls.

We have seen the Barrage of Bernier in the media simply continued onwards in December through his Global Compact Stance and the UN’s Global Compact on Migration stressing how dangerous they were. The first contains basically a concerted measure to manipulate our media and limit our freedom of speech. The second is determined to facilitate mass migrations, give equal rights and access to our social services to all migrants, and manipulate our media to prevent criticism of anything related to these migrants.
Bernier was the first politician in Ottawa to raise the alarm on this Global Compact and even sponsored a petition about it. You can sign it here

As with many issues the People’s Party and Bernier have already taken the lead. He will continue to do so through the organizational structure swelling up under him.

Perhaps the CBC Can Simply FLEE      

The CBC is proving an increasing threat to our democracy as part of the erosion of a responsible and independent press which has been regarded as a cornerstone of a free society.

The CBC is nearly 100% dependent upon tax-payer funding. The Canadian government must cease the subsidizing of unfair competition from CBC/Radio-Canada with the private media on TV, radio, and the web. Instead of doing this the Liberals have attempted to ensure that all the country’s media will become dependent on government to some extent. On November 22, 2018 they did this when announcing a $600 million media bailout package for those they deem dealing with their government in ‘appropriate manners’. Simply put, reporting in manners favorable to them and the policies they propose.

Max Bernier has made it crystal clear he will not tolerate such rot as this.

He has also made it crystal clear he does not believe in corporate welfare. On November 14, 2018 Maxime pledged to defund the CBC – The Rebel Toronto Rally >

Max has personally experienced the CBC attempts to castigate him and smear his reputation for quite some time. Whether against himself or another such actions can infuriate him to action. He will not let such injustice go unanswered and such was the occurrence when Wendy Mesley – CBC ‘The Weekly’ tried to hatchet him on-air. 

After the CBC interview aired , Maxime Bernier’s Twitter account angrily called Mesley out for her ‘smear job.’ Mesley fabricated a twisted story about a libertarian conspiracy funded by US billionaires and tried to imply that Maxime had somehow violated Canadian electoral laws.

This was simply a CBC ‘hit jobas was pointed out by Bryton Cherrier on September 24, 2018. Cherrier ran for the B.C. Libertarian Party in the 2017 provincial election. His aim was to get out the party’s message of maximum personal freedom and minimal personal taxes.  >

As another Facebook participant has stated: “Mesley clearly has an agenda going into the interview to link him to ‘American billionaires’ and the racist right wing nutjobs. Max seemed initially baffled by her line of questioning and then got his bearing once he realized what game was afoot. It’s sad that the CBC condones and participates in this type of journalism, but for now I will lay the blame solely on the interviewer. If, however, the CBC starts regularly referring to Max’s party as a ‘fringe right wing party’ or some such lazy and biased term, I will be less generous in my assessment.”

Way to go Facebook Fella, but relax and remember that the affable, friendly and generally positive Bernier can when necessary effectively compare the ludicrous with what they are. Such was the case when he named leadership challenger Kellie Leitch a “karaoke version of Donald Trump”.

However, the CBC needs a ‘dog whistle’ to start calling in their tax eating ‘bitch patrols’. Canadians are fed up with the lesbian misogynist pack of howlers gnawing the flesh of the normal Canadian family down to the bone. It is best they should start to flee now. Just as Cherrier stated in disgust – “the CBC is complete bogus garbage”.

I think he is 90% correct and I think Bernier will help us dispose of the rotted bulk.

It is obvious I am going to vote Bernier in 2019 as the best man running to complete such a job. But as I stated, I am no political hack so I had to ask myself some hard questions before I accepted the fact.



Why the Big Questions?

The big questions I had to ask myself about Mad Max stemmed from his statement: “I’m always honest.” 

I fully believe there is no duplicity within the man in what is taking place with him now and the events surrounding the Peoples Party of Canada. But some events of the past forced me to determine why I am comfortable in this position.

The Lords of Chaos have no where to travel in Bernier’s present to halt him in this advance underway so the attack dogs like Wendy Mesley, Hamish Marshall and Gerald Butts have no recourse except to dig up bones to gnaw on. But dry bones shatter, splinter and penetrate both throats and intestines and will destroy them by gnawing both night and day.

As to The Cuckoo Birds fliting around the debris, their beaks are cancer laden, incapable of holding even the safest shard and their wings so weakened they cannot even get off the ground. It is best they simply hop off over the horizon now before the fur, fins and feathers of 2019 truly erupt.

I know every person comes to a juncture in their life where they must emerge knowingly being able to state – “I’m always honest” – (I am always honest now trying to do what I believe is right for people, based on mistaken bones I buried with my past.) – Bernier has emerged today to such position that he no longer scampers on to the dark side of the moon.

Now, whether a Christian or not, anyone who genuinely does right by people advances the Kingdom of God. Thus, in natural process whether comprehended by themselves or not, the bones of the past are buried through their actions in such fashion that they cannot any longer prove a distraction upon the pathway they now walk. I have stated prior that Bernier is not a hypocrite that postures religiously. Also, that I do not know if he even comprehends the fulfillment of scripture that he is, by simply refusing to let past events cloud the present needs and future requirements of Canada.

I do know this – “And Jesus said unto him, no man, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.  (Luke 9:62)

Bernier is not looking back, nor will he be dragged into useless chewing of bones with those that attempt to. Thus, he fulfills my primary requirement that he is fit for the kingdom of God. Whether he comprehends this in the same manner as myself is not an issue, the evidence of the refusals and emergence until today is the fact that first placed my mind at rest. Today in no manner is he lying when he states – “I’m always honest.”

Now, let me be the ‘bone digger’ and we shall look at some matters that came to the surface for me and try to place your mind at rest. Remember, like every other citizen I must also cast my vote.


First Nations Concerns are a political priority in this country to avoid Chaos.

No matter where searched I have been unable to find a photo of Bernier dressed in First Nations costumes. He quite obviously knows that the outer attire does not address the indigenous population true concerns or show genuine unity with them in any fashion.

Back on September 11, 2018 it was evident there is a big battle brewing over indigenous rights in this Nation. It was also evident that the Trudeau government will never solve it. >

Almost immediately, on September 12, 2018 the Ontario chiefs said they plan to stop Ottawa’s proposed Indigenous rights framework ‘at all costs’.  >

Looking for answers I started moving forward and given the mans performance records the Post Media report of November 28, 2018 provided me assurance that Bernier was determined to see First Nations receive justice and full positioning in the constitutional heritage of this country.

“Bernier said he will be rolling out policies for First Nations people in the coming weeks. He says First Nations have a special place in the Canadian constitution — a historical role — and wants to work with them to address challenges.

“We are giving billions of dollars to help other countries but at the same time, aren’t doing anything to help First Nations,” Bernier said. “I will have a concrete policy on that. We will need to do a big reform.”

I expect these reform policies will be on the table early in 2019 at which time La Ronge Chief Tammy Cook-Searson may be astute enough to get out of the bed she has crawled into with Trudeau. She should if seriously desiring ‘big reform’ to the benefit of her heritage and Canada in totality.



Maxime Bernier has been both a man of scandal and a man scandalized. There is no doubt that there have been women involved at every poignant juncture of his life. One might say there have been too many women in his life if he had not emerged a much wiser man from the events that stand him in front of us today.

Many sources have commented how upbeat and charming he is, going about shaking hands and posing for pictures. Quickly building relations with people seems to just come naturally to him and has earned him a title of The Dapper Politician.

Others label Max as that rogue MP for Beauce, Que, the historical headache of the Conservative Party, a narcissist, and an egomaniac with an enlarged ‘Achilles Heel’ when it comes to making judgments.

But when it comes to political policies Max has varied little since entering the Conservative arena. He quite flatly states: “It’s the party who changed. I didn’t change. I’m the same guy. I believe in the same ideas.”

But the formation of the character of a man of true integrity evolved throughout his political life and evidenced itself in the relationships he had with the females around him.

I do not know the number of female related adventures the handsome Frenchman had in the trip of getting here, that remains between him and God. I will only be dealing with the three most important ones in the transition of his life.

Althia Raj of the Huffington Post did an extensive three-part expose of Bernier titled: Separatism and Scandal: Maxime Bernier’s Unlikely Road to Redemption.

This is a very professional piece of work that leaves not one aspect of the man’s life untilled from her perspective. You can tap into Part 1: ‘The Albertan From Quebec’  and read to your hearts content. Continue then to Part 2: ‘The ‘Reasonable Libertarian’ and Part 3: The New Reformer

I am only going to turn over the necessary furrows to show you the Maxime Bernier I believe you need to know for our Nations betterment.


One Good Woman: Caroline Chauvin (1991-2005) is the first woman of impact in Bernier’s life. She is the mother of his two children and they have been divorced for thirteen years.

However, Bernier remains involved with his children and explains that he keeps his children’s life private due to their importance to him, and that he is proud of them. 

His pride in the girls highlights his sensitivity about his own English skills, freely admitting he was very bad in English in school and states – “I still need to work on it.” And he does.

But his daughters attended private English school in Montreal and he notes proudly that his daughters speak with no accent.

Bernier met his former wife, Caroline Chauvin at an art gallery opening he was attending with a group of young lawyers. Max pursued her and they were married in 1991 in a Roman Catholic church ceremony. She is the mother of his two daughters, Charlotte and Megan. Max was with her for 13 years. The marriage didn’t work out, and their divorce was ironically finalized on Sept. 14, 2005 which was their wedding anniversary.

But Max has remained close with his daughters and respecting Caroline says: “We didn’t succeed in our marriage, but we succeeded in our divorce, and now she is my best friend and we have a very good relationship. Sometimes we have dinner at my girlfriend’s and her boyfriend together, and so it’s a good relationship. I’m very happy, very proud of that.”

And this is where the rubber hits the road – “We didn’t succeed in our marriage, but we succeeded in our divorce.”

The most common causes of divorce are through financial pressures, career demands or infidelity on the part of the spouses.

Caroline Chauvin did not divorce Max due to his inability at provision of the family needs, even though his self-imposed idealism and career demands were causing him to shift positions.

There were ‘job pressures’ upon the both of them and this cannot be used as an excuse for divorce. These people could only make a success out of their relationship through permanent physical sexual separation of their lives. 

Bluntly put, Max was a womanizer and obviously not ‘always honest’ at this time. For certain, he didn’t come home telling Caroline in his charming French accent: “Oh, please my dear, forgive me for being late, I banged that new bimbo in the steno-pool today. I promise I won’t let it happen again.”

Over thirteen years, how often such a potential tryst may have taken place with Max and with whom really is of no importance. Max was raised in the mindset of male dominance and masculine view of sexual conquest as being a trophy to be held up for other men. There was an instinctual establishing of hierarchy through this action in such a male world. Max had a genuine love for women, a genuine love for Caroline within the boundaries of the world encompassing most males during his era. His actions were just the natural thing to do. ‘Hide and seek sex’ was a common practice that people tried not to face up to in the generation he emerged through. I know this as a fact for the generation was mine and the reality I had to travel through as well. Playing ‘come out, come out wherever you are – and I do not really care whomever you are’ is a life shattering spiritually disastrous game of sexual gratification. Many women were more than willing participants in this moral erosion, but to a large degree they were victimized in the male sexually dominated world of the time.

But a woman has an intense instinctual hatred for infidelity, the act that completely denigrates her personal sexual being in her own mind; infidelity displays itself to her not only as something that does not see the supreme value her womanhood as she offers it, but the action is seen as actually scorning it. This is what rotted and ate away the bindings that allowed Caroline to contend within the life she was facing.

Caroline Chauvin is a strong woman as evidenced in making a success out of divorce. She must have simply grown fed up waiting for change, truly accepted that the nature of the beast was not going to allow it and took action. Obviously, Caroline did not want her daughters growing to womanhood thinking their charming father, who they all loved, was the type of man that a woman had to accept simply to have a male in their life.

What was the straw that broke the camels back of their marriage? It was a compendium of things, but it was not the demon of politics. It was the sexual state of their marriage and Max’s continuous pressing for his ideals and goals, sorting them out and solidifying them that was the dual ignition that drove his gleaming ‘Beauce Coup’ full speed into the political arena.

And Max first headed out to crash his car in the Political Roller Derby at the point in his life where his employment was in a shambles and Caroline had filed for divorce. The ‘randy dandy’ was emotionally strained and drained, but visibly excited to be getting behind the wheel of a machine that he thought would gain him the means to implement his political social desires and goals. His father had craftily driven this same vehicle and had taught Max a great deal about how to place his hands on the political steering wheel and when to hit the gas.

But he obviously had not taught Max the why and how to keep his hands off ‘just one more’ woman’s ass. And therein lies the necessary political multi-car pileup that Max needed to genuinely change his personal life.

So off drove Our Boy from Beauce, eager to get his hands on the political wheel and another woman’s ass.


One Bad Bitch: Julie Couillard (2007-2008) is best described as Tit Monster, Twit Twat, The Interlude and Woman Scorned.

During April-May of 2008 Maxime Bernier suffered great ridicule and mockery in the press for his sexual occupancy with Julie Couillard. From the picture to our left the Globe and Mail titled them “the two boobs and a scandal”. Media were commenting and running the picture repeatedly making comments such as: “Why have the media gone so nuts over l’affaire Bernier? Simple. They get to run that picture again and again! The one with the fabulously good-looking boob. Okay, two boobs. One is barely contained by a dress that appears to be made from a handkerchief, and the other one is walking along beside.”

Bernier was mocked as a fashionable fitting model for the three ingredients of a good old-fashioned sex scandal.

“A classic sex scandal must have three ingredients: a voluptuous femme fatale, a horny (preferably married) senior politician, and state secrets worth spilling.” They tittered and tee-heed “If only we had more biker molls and cleavage, they might run more stories about Canadian politics.”

Bernier states that his time with Couillard was the biggest mistake I ever made.

And the press has never wanted to let the matter of the two boobs disappear. >  Maxime Bernier caught driving with suspended licence | CTV News

While driving five years later on June 16, 2013, Bernier was pulled over on an unrelated matter and ended up dealing with some kind of unpaid traffic ticket. The ticket had placed his drivers license under suspension. Bernier had no knowledge of the ticket being unpaid nor the suspension.

The issue was immediately taken care of, but the reporter had to make certain right at the end of the article to state: “Bernier is the Minister of State for Small business and Tourism. He resigned as Foreign Affairs Minister in 2008 after leaving sensitive documents at the home of his ex-girlfriend, but eventually returned to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s cabinet.”

Bernier had been sworn in as Minister of State for Small Business and Tourism on May 18,2011 but he was no longer dragging the Couillard ‘ho on the go’ along. She was nowhere to be seen wearing a low-cut dress as she had worn to his swearing-in as Foreign Affairs Minister in August 2007.

It had been some six years prior to the ticket incident, at the August 2007 cabinet shuffle a grinning Bernier toted the big breasted Couillard with a plunging neckline to Rideau Hall for his swearing in as Foreign Affairs Minister. This brought the strutting rutting debonair Frenchman to draw unwanted attention in English Canada amid friend and foe alike.

As to Couillard, she liked the lifestyle and attention gotten hanging on the arm and laying under the now politically sweating Bernier. The relationship did not last long but it changed the course of Bernier’s life.

Following the swearing in, scandal erupted as news emerged that Couillard had ties to Quebec’s notorious biker gangs and led an unsavory life. But the big head kick for Bernier came when Couillard told the press Bernier had been careless with confidential briefing notes.

“The public had discovered her former lover was Gilles Giguère, a man closely linked to Hells Angels boss Maurice “Mom” Boucher, who was murdered in 1996. Her ex-husband, Stéphane Sirois, was a member of the Rockers biker gang and later became a police informant.

The opposition parties questioned whether Bernier’s former girlfriend posed a security risk. Harper suggested that Liberal leader Stéphane Dion and Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe were “gossipy old busybodies” and said his relationship with Couillard was nobody’s business.”

A review by the Canadian government stated the mishandling of NATO documents by the foreign minister was embarrassing but not a blow to national security.

 At the time it was reported “Couillard herself does not have a criminal record, nor has she been charged with criminal activity and had not maintained any known links with Hells Angels after 1999. In April 2008, Bernier inadvertently left a secretive briefing book at Couillard’s home. Couillard gave the binder to a lawyer for transmittal to the government, and then the media revealed her links. Although Prime Minister Stephen Harper had initially dismissed Bernier’s relationship with Couillard as irrelevant, he ultimately accepted Bernier’s resignation over the matter. 

The notes were related to a NATO summit in Romania, and addressed NATO’s relationship with Russia; expansion to the Balkans; Afghan prisoners; the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; AECL reactors in Estonia; and the presence of Al-Qaida in Pakistan, among other topics. Bernier, who was separated from Couillard at that time, accepted blame for the incident and resigned his cabinet post on May 26, 2008. Bernier explained that this incident made him rethink about his political career. Since then, he kept government information within his parliamentary office while staying up late to finish duties.” 

Bernier continues to state that his time with Couillard was the biggest mistake I ever made.

“Bernier denies knowing anything about her background. At the time, he stayed quiet while the media explored Couillard’s potential links to organized crime, then the possibility she was also involved in illegal lobbying.”

“I thought I must resign as a politician, as a member of Parliament. I didn’t know what to do.” The news coverage did not cease. “Early in the morning I was in the news, during the day and in every newspaper. I didn’t know about her past, so I was learning at the same time.”

Couillard published a book during the 2008 election campaign that clearly was meant to harm him, and Couillard says she told Bernier about her past soon after they met.”

This is a fabrication on her part. Bernier certainly did forget his briefcase at abandonment of Couillard’s love nest, but the documents were secure within it when he flew her coop. Bernier maintains he never took the papers out of his briefcase, that Couillard stole them out of it and with Couillard’s refusal to participate in a Foreign Affairs investigation into the incident it would seem to verify the fact.

During this time of life Maxime Bernier was emotionally trapped in the lifestyle of a man we used to term as being ‘a pussy hound’, constantly sniffing around looking for fresh female tracks.

Julie Couillard was as much a depraved slut internally as her outward appearance and actions portrayed her to be. I am not saying that Max’s actions in relation to her were anymore noble than those of Donald Trump in the case of Stormy Daniels. But, why is it we have become so damn politically correct that we will not freely state what is staring us straight in the face. Both of these women were publicly whores, gougers and moral misfits standing in the flesh with no shame for what they were, what they were doing or who they were doing it with. Each was doing semen stained underwear in slightly different manner with two different levels of politicians who had the common disease of being pussy hounds. Money and social position do not dictate the qualifications of the true pussy hound nor the dog that is best at running down the cracked women in life they ultimately mount. Perhaps old Stormy Sewer Cat got her stimulus to action through the antics of her precursor Couillard. You never know what sparks such minds into immediate action, but both are females and their natures are too similar to look for the ignition switch in what is common to the pair. You need to look for the major difference that was driving their actions.

The expression ‘hell has no fury like a woman scorned’ was the visible difference I found between the two. Stormy Daniels was in no manner on the Donald’s tracks for scorning her, she was quite apparent on being on the singular path of ‘cash for the gash’ and was simply using every measure she could to bring it about. This ultimately blew sky high in the Court with her being ordered to even pay the expenses of the Donald’s legal team. The greedy piglet should not have gone back to the trough wanting more after the success of her initial big mouth full of hush money.

This was not the case with the Crazed Couillard as the now very publicly fidgeting Frenchman in 2007 did scorn her through their sexual relationship. Whorish or not his actions toward her spoke loudly – ‘you aren’t worth the money honey’ and he headed out the door as fast as he could looking for some form of Hill security in his troubled life.

At this time Max may have thought of himself as the sexiest MP on the Hill, with the conquests to prove it, but his mental state was showing him not to be the sharpest tool in the lifestyle he needed to cut himself free of.

According to reports the square-jawed Foreign Affairs Minister had taken a headlong dive into the deep end of the sexual pool with Couillard within minutes of his first meeting her. In his lust he was immediately determined to Bop the Bimbo and offered her the price he was willing to pay and the length of time he wanted her services.

Thus, he asked her to be his official girlfriend about five to ten minutes after they met. This position would entitle her to first-class travel at tax-payer expense and a chance to meet interesting people that would facilitate her ‘career of choice’.

In Couillard’s words she claims Max stated – “I can’t switch girlfriends like I change shirts, so you have to be my official girlfriend for at least a year, in spite of what might happen between us.”

The offer was quite acceptable to the former model, aspiring actress, unsuccessful real estate agent, divorced biker gang ho, associate of gangland killers with no apparent visible means of support outside the flytrap of her thighs. She had an offer of job security for one-year duration and what more could a working girl ask in the unstable times of her life?

I am quite a Disparaging Descriptive Writer am I not? Perhaps someone will recommend me for the Julie Payette ‘Governor General Disparaging Descriptive Writer Award’ and I will be able to fulfill the writing goals that have pushed at me throughout life, eh? I guess this is one path to finding Hill security for a former pussy hound like myself, eh? I suppose such comments as this should give me double the chance of Liberal Hill security as I have now qualified myself for the Julie Payette ‘Governor General Sarcastic Old Bastard Olympics Medal’, eh?

Whatever, Mad Max was hopping around trying to sniff his way out of the hole he had buried himself in with Couillard. From every side he was being bombarded with jabs at his groin strained brain. He simply got up and fled. What exact date and time I do not know. But I know we heard Couillard complain – “He stopped taking my calls.” – He simply dumped her and fled, leaving behind some dirty socks and forgotten state secrets that have been acknowledged of no true importance to anyone.

But the circumstance had driven Bernier toward the first steps of recovery from the lifestyle that held him in bondage till that point in life. And now we see him holding himself up as a worthy contender to lead as Prime Minister of Canada. But people have been stating him to be a French version of Donald Trump and that they do not want a Bimbo Bopper like Trump in leadership. But what is the difference between these two men?

The simple difference between Bernier and Trump is this. And,  I do not care if Bernier Bopped every Bodacious Bimbo crossing his path from Beauce, Quebec to Balzac, Alberta.

Bernier fully admits the mistakes he made during the timeframe of Couillard sexual intimacy in his life. He has never tried to cover them up or excuse his mistakes till this present day and this speaks to the personal maturity occasioned in his life.

And Trump has never once acknowledged the fullness of the truth or details surrounding Stormy Daniels. He has fought such every step of the way.

We will never see Max face impeachment as a liar for claiming – “I never had sex with that woman” – as did Bill Clinton in his cry from the Whitehouse about Monica Lewinski. Max repeatedly proves himself not a liar and capable of now saying – ‘I am always honest.’

The events he passed through changed Bernier and he goes so far as to state belief that if he had not passed through it all he would not have been positioned to where he is truly fit to lead today. He states that he needed to be ‘tossed into the doghouse of politics’ that the Couillard affair had occasioned, to sort himself out and cement once and for all the principals he had been espousing and have now come to fully dominate his life.

Following the 2008 debacle he had the simplicity of being a basic MP and thus he was free to politically roam about Canada, no longer sniffing along as a full-blown pussy hound. Whether he withdrew from such addiction cold turkey or was weaned off like a baby leaving the tit for the bottle, then getting to the point of being able to select the best drink from the fridge of life itself is only a matter he knows and really of no concern. He ultimately emerged a man completely cured of an infectious spiritual disease.

Moving about Canada as he did, he discovered there was an audience that liked the authenticity in his voice and his messages of “no compromises” on true conservative principles. He states this is what emboldened him to run for leadership at the proven necessity of having to form his own Party.

“It was some two weeks after the biker news was leaked through the press, that Bernier’s chief of staff, Aaron Gairdner, received a phone call from Couillard’s lawyer, saying she had confidential documents she wanted to return to the government.

According to a timeline in a Foreign Affairs departmental report, Bernier’s driver was sent to Montreal to pick up the secret envelope, and Gairdner and Bernier discussed his resignation.

The next day, he met with Harper and stepped down, just as Couillard prepared to appear on TV to talk about her ex-lover’s carelessness with confidential files.

The documents in question were low-sensitivity briefing notes from a NATO summit held earlier in April. After returning from the Bucharest trip, Bernier visited Couillard with the papers marked “secret” in his briefcase. He insists he didn’t take them out. He never noticed they went missing.

An internal Foreign Affairs probe was launched. The RCMP also investigated.

Emotionally wrecked and stressed, Bernier headed to a monastery, l’Abbaye de Saint-Benoît-du-Lac, in the Eastern Townships. “Without any television, without any radio, without any phone, I began to think about me. And about my future. And that helped me a lot.”

He says he spoke to a monk every night. He briefly contemplated leaving politics. After five days of near solitude, he decided he’d stay and fight in the next election.”

He posited how he should do this. He states that in discussion with former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney he was advised to ignore the barrage of journalists that were plaguing him and to speak directly to his constituents about the matter. He did so in a speech to his riding explaining the circumstances that had evolved for him.

Bernier stated to them – “When you take a hard shot, what do you do? You roll up your sleeves and get back to work. I cannot promise you that I will be a perfect person, but I think I’ve learned enough from this ordeal to be a better person.”

And those were the key words that marked Bernier a changed man for life – ‘I think I’ve learned enough from this ordeal to be a better person’.

People believed him then and I believe him now when he says ‘I’m always honest’.

During the election campaign that fall Bernier was faced with many enthusiastic supporters and one man spoke to him about the openness and lasting effect it had that day he told people the simple truth of events, and that he had learned enough through the ordeal to be a better person.

The man stated: ‘Maxime’ — I’ll always remember that — ‘you’ll have the biggest majority. Everybody will vote for you. Because you did make a mistake and we can understand that — but don’t do that again.’

“I won’t” said Bernier and he has proven himself true.

He did win the election with 62% of the vote and carried on, casting like medallions in gold, bronze and silver the principles of Freedom, Responsibility, Fairness and Respect he personifies today.

Today Max states: “You know, I can have a bad day here in the media or a bad week in the media and I know that it isn’t the end of the world. I had three, four bad months in the media, and so it gives me more assurances … Now, I am able to speak about it right now easily, but during that time and a little bit after it was very tough.”

As to Couillard the woman scorned through straight up sexual rejection, bridge of one-year sexual contract or simply opportunistic cash there is not much left worth considering through additional research. I don’t know if she came clear with one loonie from the entire affair through her attempted cash grab and I do not consider it worth my time finding out.

However, I do know that she underwent investigation for a part played in a bid for an airport security contract and her marriage ties to a former biker gang member. I know the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) launched an investigation into how she obtained the secret documents. I know the RCMP also launched an investigation into whether her mother was offered a patronage appointment by Conservative Party officials to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada in exchange for some sort of hush up.

She did not co-operate and I do not have a clue where she is mulling things over tonight or if she is even alive.

I know she generally was just a most unsavory ho that served a very necessary purpose in the spiritual transformation of Max Bernier’s life.

If her actions were just the straight vindictive display of a woman scorned and attempting to destroy Max Bernier and end his political career they certainly blew up in her face, for her actions drove him forward to the fulfillment of the political career we find him in now.

For that we owe the unrighteous bitch a thank you, for Max is the only reasonable political candidate on the horizon that can potentially halt our slide toward Chaos.

And it is the next and final woman that will occupy his life that is helping to make this so.


One Refining Gem: Catherine Letarte (2010 to present) has proven the balance bar ballerina that displays Maxime Bernier’s real life today.

In 2011, Bernier was welcomed again to Harper’s cabinet table as a junior Minister for Small Business and Tourism, quite prepared to demonstrate that all matters evoking scandal were no longer behind him, simply no more a part of his life. By this time Catherine Letarte had become an integral part of his life.

Catherine Letarte runs a mental health community centre in Montreal and she has previously worked for a women’s shelter. Letarte simply does not perceive herself as not being involved in social work in some manner.

She is a self-disciplined organized person strongly espousing feminine worth and values but she is no manner a misogynist. She is quick to focus on what she finds physically and spiritually attractive in life and will almost immediately take steps to bring it into her personal existence.

At her first physical spotting of Bernier she knew to her core that this was the man capable of fulfilling her expectations of what she believed exhibited the best qualities of being male.

It was Letarte that first laid eyes on Bernier, not he upon her. And it was at a singles brunch subsequent where they encountered that she was the one that first asked for a date.

Bernier took one look and had no hesitancy in responding and their first date was at an outdoor skating rink in Montreal’s Old Port. She found Bernier down-to-earth and easy to talk to. “He’s always the same, just as authentic with everyone. I don’t see him changing.”

From that point forward the balance bar ballerina consistently told the truth to all comers: “He has a very sensitive side that people simply don’t know.”

Catherine Letarte, is his partner for life and she admits life with a politician isn’t always easy.

Max Bernier has taught her to run. He runs nearly every day, and a few years ago covered 100 kilometers in his riding to raise money for charity.

Max participates in marathons and on September 29, 2013, ran in an ultra-marathon for thirteen hours, raising $153,000 for a local food bank. “That feat shows that when he has an idea in his head and he fixes objectives, he is focused,” Letarte says.

Given the rapid advance of the People Party they began talking about every aspect of what it would mean for her if he moved into Stornoway, the official Opposition leader’s residence.

Personally, I believe they should start talking about every aspect of what it will mean when they take the residence provisions now the benefit of Trudeau.

But Max has had to shed his ‘Aging playboy image’ that was ground into the minds of many people by a hostile press that just won’t let go.

It was his closest friend and political associate Martin Masse that convinced Max that to politically win he needed to let people truly see through his committed common-law marriage of seven years with Catherine Letarte. People needed to know that he no longer was the womaniser he had been with Caroline Chauvin. And people certainly needed the fact unequivocally clear that he was not at all some form of aging playboy still dealing with the residue of a tough divorce that had enmeshed him in unwise decisions running around with Couillard.

Max still preferred to keep his relationship with his daughters private and not to display the time and effort he put into being a father. But after all he had passed through, he knew women truly desired a committed family man and people required the assurance of such change in him.

All the people intimate in his life agreed so Bernier started giving interviews talking about his relationship with Catherine Letarte, a former ballerina who trained at the National Ballet School. It was then Catherine started to disclose the reality of their life together.

Letarte states that being in the spotlight is not something she likes, but she has accepted it. And when it comes to politics, like all other aspects of their union “he has never imposed anything on me.

Charlotte – Catherine – Max – Megan

The thing Max and Catherine have valued the most was their uninterrupted time together and the privacy entailed. Through life together they had learned to handle a necessary schedule to properly care for the responsibilities both in their shared and singular existence.

“Life with a politician isn’t easy”, she acknowledges. Before the Party declaration Bernier spent about a third of his time in Ottawa, a third in Montreal with her in Isle des Sœurs or with his daughters every second week, and a third in Beauce at his condo.

Letarte doesn’t desire such absences, but she doesn’t mind them as she has a fulfilling life of her own life, and until this year was happy to be living in the shadows — and it was her choice to do, she notes.

“He chose life in a public sphere, I did not. But I am conscious that that is likely going to change, and that is OK, too. There is no choice.”

She also views herself as a calming influence on Max to some degree in his political life. However, she states sometimes she appears to have almost to force him to take a beach vacation for relaxation. But she notes that even with the sand and the sea Max relaxes in his own manner. It is not quite how she would relax, but she says Max insists that reading a book about the economy on a beach is truly what relaxes him.

“That’s who he is,” Letarte says. “We won’t change him.”

And Canada, why should we want to change the man to something of lesser worth then the person he has fought so hard to become?

Always Correct?

Is Max Bernier a saint? Has Max Bernier always being correct in his decisions? Nope! But how he has handled the affairs of life and politics in general is what gave me important insight into the man.

 He is prepared to ‘question his own actions’ on the basis of what he knows to be right, not on what he may have thought was right at some past point of time.

Bernier’s campaign platform is based primarily on the ideas he’s pitched consistently for two decades starting with his writings at the Montreal Economic Institute.

But, over time he appears to possibly be wobbling around policies regarding sexual identity.  In 2006, he voted against gay marriage, saying his constituents didn’t support it. But ten years later in 2016 he was one of the MPs speaking in favour of striking the party’s definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman from its official policy book. 

Bernier also voted for expanding the Canadian Human Rights Act to transsexual individuals, as a protection against discrimination for gender identity or gender expression. He was to change his mind however and explains it as such: “I voted for because Bill C-16 legislation because I voted against discrimination. But after speaking with University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson, became convinced that the bill would hurt freedom of speech.”

Bernier then wrote to the Senate urging them not to pass the bill, telling them he had made “a mistake”.  This is the same Senate that back in 2013 had him boldly calling for their abolishment through a referendum.

His personally sexuality was once a problematic area for Bernier and it may be that he is now formulating his final policy declaration surrounding all aspects of personal sexuality and related aspects such as abortion. This could be in part why he did not vote on Bill C-255 referred to as Mollies Law. But neither did Rona Ambrose cast her vote on the Bill, and some of her viewpoints I am staunchly against.

The jury is out for me in consideration of just exactly how Bernier will be entrenching the sexuality issues in policy and legislation that I have referred to. But I have no doubt they will be handled in a fair and respectful manner and that he is strong enough to get the job done in the best interests of the Nation. I also know him to be capable of withstanding opposition from all sides when it violates his principles as the record has shown.

Once government whip Jay Hill described Bernier as being a strong Minister who “didn’t just parrot the bullshit that came from his bureaucrats.” And Bernier will not be tweeting any bird brain calls to action in the matters referred to here.

Bernier is also a man able to admit it when personality characteristics manifests themselves in him that are not appropriate. He not only admits them but will actually do something to change them. This showed itself in the handling of the Couillard affair with his Beauce riding.

It also shows itself in his now being able to admit to his arrogance in dealing with employment matters when he was dismissed from his position as Vice-president of Corporate Affairs and Communications at Standard Life, the former insurance giant.

The honesty of Bernier in speaking candidly about himself, about Government and about basic freedoms, respect and fairness built him a political and media following before he ever exited the Conservative Party. The honesty will continue and thus the following will enlarge.

He is blatantly honest in what he now condones.

Condoning Anarchy – In Company of Racists?

Bernier remains a lawyer and could practice civil law in Quebec if he should ever leave politics. He understands the legalities surrounding matters like sedition and treason and the nuances that must be overcome to deal with them truly and effectively today.

Max grew up in the environment of Quebec where it was normal to be in favor of separation of la belle Province and he supported sovereigntists during the 1995 Quebec referendum. He was a seperatonist at the time but was in no manner of their radical bent that went so far as to erupt in the War Measures Act implementation by Pierre the Pedophile Trudeau.

He was for perceivably justifiable principles calling for a more sovereign Quebec, but these principles he believed should be applied to all the Provincial governments. The fact is that the separationists of the times would not even consider him as being one of their own.

The full-blooded separatist Bernard Landry attests he fired Max from their association because he was not a separatist of their blend. They did not want him potentially influencing their movement through his ideas and ‘watering down the movement’. In 2014 Bernier laughed as he told reporters he had ‘flirted’ with the PQ but had voted “no” during the referendum.

Bernier is in no manner a separatist looking for a Nation of Quebec, nor is he a racist of any sort espousing the French or English heritage as being superior. He is not trying in any manner to slip into a position where he can bring about some special economic protections or privileges for his province of origin. The economic measures and policies he may espouse, using the situation of Quebec to exemplify them, are the exact same programs he believes best for all our provinces.

As Elanor Brodie stated – “He believes what he knows and he knows what he believes.”

The sincerity and stability of the man is showing itself in the sweep of popularity that Max is experiencing. And in looking to field candidates that believe in an equal and fair unity of the provinces Bernier has stated he has the goal of leading by example.

“Right now, my goal is to show that, yes, you can be elected if you speak about what you believe with passion, with conviction, without making any exceptions on your principles.”

This is the Max Bernier you should reflect upon from time to time, and know that without any exceptions, he is the best leadership candidate to obliterate Trudeau from the Canadian political scene. 


Maxime Bernier is solidly based from coast to coast and daily growing stronger.

Parliamentary rules allow PPC leader Maxime Bernier to ask one question about every ten days during Question Period. All around him members in the House of Commons were flinching at the truth of his rebuking calls for their reform in 2018. For certain they are not celebrating his return to the House in 2019, let alone his ongoing barrage for political sanity through the press.

Between all the press releases and video links given and the web site below it is more than obvious that Mad Maxime Bernier is our best hope of avoiding absolute Chaos in the Nation.

You decide where you should place your vote in 2019, where you should expend your energy in doing what is right for the nation and also prepare yourself to enact a ‘final judgment’ in the matter of the Kid from Redvers.

Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 07:00 PM at the Hilton Waterfront Hotel in Saint John, NB, Canada there will be a PPC Rally with Maxime Bernier. It is a good date to establish that you have clearly made your choices.


This is the People’s Party of Canada under leadership of Mad Max – the Albertan from Quebec.

And this man shows us a proven ability of the Bernier led contingent to properly interact through social media to ensure Canada comes through to righteous policies, cleaning up the political mess to the benefit of one and all. This is Mr. Frank Vaughan a staunch hunter on tracking down media Truth. >

Following we hear Max answer the question of Why the Media is of importance in this electoral race.

“I have been concerned for the past 12 years. How to reconcile my desire to serve the public with a political dynamic entirely dominated by pandering and vote-buying strategies. The Conservatives play that game as much as the Liberals, even though it directly contradicts the small-government, free-market principles the party purports to defend.

When I resigned, I had come to the conclusion that the Conservative party cannot be reformed and that if I want to do politics differently, I needed to do it elsewhere.

How do I plan to do this? By systematically taking positions based on principles I believe in and that accord with what I think is the public interest; and by resisting pressure from interest groups seeking favours, despite the short-term political cost.

What gives me hope is that with the Internet, it is now much easier and less costly to find relevant information and mobilize around an issue. A small group of motivated citizens can potentially have as much influence as a lobby group spending millions of dollars.”

In other words, Max is using the internet and social media to level the economic playing field of the globalists and standard government hacks that have full unrestricted access of cash, in particular access to the cash of the public purse.

Bernier is a champion of a flat tax, and he doesn’t believe simply spending money will create wealth or jobs, so he’s rigid in his policy prescriptions. If there is a recession don’t expect him to use a stimulus package to jump start the economy. – “No, I won’t have a stimulus package because for me, it is not a stimulus package, it is a sedative package.” So, prepare yourself for this and understand that what he ultimately wants to end is private dependence on the state through corporate welfare.

Bernier is not ‘Harper with a Smile’ and has moved beyond Harper in his quest for true freedoms and equality in Canada. In fact, I know that Bernier and Harper were never reading the same fine print when it comes to conservatism. Bernier gives full recognition to the fact of the Peoples Party platforms appearing quite similar to the Reform Party’s 1996-1997 policies and principles statement that was co-authored by Harper. (called the Blue Book)

But topical based similarities are coincidental, such as they are, as Harper was foundationally an incrementalist and Bernier is basically a libertarian.

Harper was an incrementalist and followed a policy of making social changes by the smallest degrees whenever possible. Sometimes it did not appear so for those that so vehemently opposed his policies. But it did earn him the title among many of being a cautious crusader who could have done more.

Harpers’ incrementalism is a method of working by adding to a project using many small incremental changes instead of a few more extensively planned larger jumps. Harper’s format of logical incrementalism implies that the more steps there are in implementing change the better it is for the people with whom the policy is being implemented. When you go to a Harper policy dance ‘the more steps the merrier is the tune played’ to swirl you about the floor so you don’t sweat profusely in the process.

These ideas seemed to be the ideal Conservative platform that Stephen Harper co-authored for Reform at the time he did. But as events transpired the platform fed into the internal stagnation, decay and rot that led Bernier to the point of seeing it was no longer possible to reform the party from within.

The simple fact is Conservative Reform had to merge in Canada to attempt survival through the Blue Book methodology, but the desire for true conservative reform disappeared in that merger through the political rot that Bernier identified. Thus, we have Scheer Insanity on the stage.

Max Bernier is not some closet Libertarian revolutionary desiring to bring down the entire political edifice in one resounding crash so he can erect a delusional Libertarian Utopian day dream that will implode even more loudly.

“You know, I am a libertarian and people like to call me the libertarian, and I said ‘yes’ on the economy I am a libertarian, but I am a reasonable libertarian.”

And the only reasonable thing for a responsible Libertarian to do knowing that Chaos must be avoided and the time is short to prevent it is what we see him doing. And what we see him doing truly relaxes him and is not work for Bernier.

Extensive planning is what is supposed to proceed implementation of successful Libertarian values before any resounding action is taken.  This planning and sorting indwells the nature of the Libertarian and is the balm to his soul as the solutions to problems work their way to the surface. The more quickly they emerge the more relaxed the genuine Libertarian becomes. It is for this exact reason that Max can tell Caroline unequivocally that “reading about the economy on a beach relaxes him”.

And Caroline, the one closest to him has come to agree, stating “That’s who he is, we won’t change him.” And who should know the ‘relaxed Libertarian’ better than the lady that gets down off the balance bar daily to sleep with him nightly as his wife.

Caroline also knows when Max lays down his book for the night he is totally relaxed and focused completely upon her. At her first physical spotting of Bernier she knew to her core that this man was focused in hunting, but totally willing to wait for his wife to end the search. In this instinctual knowledge she knew Max Bernier was the man capable of fulfilling her expectations of what she believed exhibited all the best qualities of being male. One of those qualities is the natural focused action that takes place between this husband and wife after they shut off the light. I imagine they must each strive to be the one who can reach the switch the fastest to flick it, shutting off the world to fully embrace the oneness that can only encompass a husband and wife.

Maxime Bernier has become with Catherine the man his heart has long desired to be. Maxime Bernier has become through all the upheavals to fully understand himself as the man of principles he believed himself to be. And this is the testimony of his wife.

Maxime Bernier is in final stage preparations and starting to place all books on the shelf as no longer necessary for reading. He is prepared to get on with the task at hand of bringing true political reform to Canada to the benefit of one and all. He has his stick firmly placed on the political ice aiming to erupt in a slapshot that will score the winning goal in the net of all that is troubling Canadian values and family life.





 The Boy from Beauce    The Kid from Redvers              Andrew Scheer

Who is proving best at keeping their stick on the ice?

I guess this Chapter all points to the reason I believe Maxime Bernier best qualifies to be the next Prime Minister of Canada and not simply the Leader of the Opposition.

Can you honestly state after all the ‘investigation and reporting’ I have done that Maxime Bernier is not the man that sits tallest in the saddle of opposition to all that is politically correct and corrupted in our land?

Maxime Bernier is truly a changed man, he admits his mistakes, has atoned for them and is moving steadily forward working for principals that have been embedded in him to fulfill his calling in life.

Base all your political decisions in factual performance of any government you perceive. You cannot base it upon media hype or fake news.  And remember this please – “No matter the times, the only way people can be sold on bold change is when they truly believe in a leader.”

We need bold changes to heal our land so make up your mind if Max Mad Bernier is the leader in whom you believe. We simply have no more time to waste in ending this race for leadership of our land. Sanity screams most loudly that Justin Trudeau Must Go Now to end the Chaos he has been pouring down upon us.


Thus, ends Chapter Six and we move into Chapter SevenThe Canadian National Party Nazi Youth Indoctrination Agenda

 It shall be posted as quickly as it exits the birth canal of my computer. Compared to Chapter Six the child is showing itself very much smaller than its older brother. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.