August 2, 2019 – 79 DAYS FOR A BERNIER TSUNAMI OF COMMON SENSE TO ENGULF THE NATION
A WEASEL REPORTER?
Anyone with half a brain understands the descriptive intent of Cody Payant stated in this report. Mark Friesen showed his contempt for this CBC-TTDPW propaganda shot. This kind of garbage does not fizz Max. When necessary he handles it as it deserves. Most often he gets a laugh out of the stupidity of it all and support for the PPC just continues to grow.
Always look to the author base and where he finds his cash to eat so he can regurgitate what his ‘employers’ desire. Use your common sense in filtering the propaganda.
So, let us get on with the realities you face IN STRAIGHT BLACK AND WHITE.
TWO – MUSLIM REALITIES
THE MUSLIM AND CITIZENSHIP TREASON
This Series elucidates why no follower of Islam can be permitted Canadian Citizenship.
Islam forbids the swearing of allegiance by the Muslim to any foreign government or agency that is not following Islam and Sharia.
All followers of Islam that have taken the Canadian Citizenship Oath of Allegiance are guilty of a deliberate act of fraud to gain the status of a Canadian citizen.
A renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East, Bernard Lewis, says Islam imposes, without limit of time or space, the duty to subjugate non-Muslims. He writes on p. 73 of The Political Language of Islam: “…it is the duty of those who have accepted them (Allah’s word and message) to strive unceasingly to convert or at least to subjugate those who have not. This obligation is without limit of time or space. It must continue until the whole world has either accepted the Islamic faith or submitted to the power of the Islamic state.”
And, as to Islamic methods of infidel subjugation we find in Sahih Muslim 19: 4294: “Muhammad says Muslims in a position of strength should impose three choices on non-Muslims: 1) become Muslim; or 2) pay protection money for the right to live precariously, as a second-class citizen; or 3) be killed.”
A democracy is a system in which all people are equal before the law, regardless of race, religion or gender. The vote of every individual counts as much as the vote of any other, and through voting the collective will of the people then determines the rules of society.
lslam is in no manner compatible with Democracy for Islamic law is absolutely adversarial with true democracy. It is a theocratic system with Allah alone at its head. Allah’s law is interpreted by a ruling body of clerics. They leave no room for a secular political system in which all people are treated as equals.
Under Islamic law, only Muslim males are entitled to full rights. The standing of women is stated as half that of men and often even less. Non-Muslims have no equal standing with Muslims. In fact, a Muslim cannot be put to death for killing an unbeliever.
An Islamic state is guided by Islamic law (Sharia) derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah (hadith). A body of clerics interprets this law and applies it to all Muslim circumstances social, cultural and political. The followers of Islam are never to be placed above the Qur’an and Sunnah any more than man should be placed above Allah.
Many contemporary Muslims claim that traditional Islamic practice is out of step with modern tastes and make very imaginative efforts to reinterpret the long-held traditions of their religion.
However, one of the core principals of Islam is Naskh (Nasikh) which ensconces their understanding that newer revelation cancels older revelation. “None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Know thou not that Allah hath power over all things?” Al-Baqarah 2:106
Muslims who truly understand the principle of Nasikh deceptively quote the Qur’an, attempting to trick the media and non-Muslims into thinking Islam is peaceful and tolerant of non-Muslims. But, there is a dividing point in the life of Muhammad where the substitution of ‘something better or similar’ took place. That point comes after what are called the Medina verses, written at a time when Muhammad was telling his disciples to pray toward towards Jerusalem in an effort to sway Jews to convert to Islam. The Jews did not fall victim to his manipulative ploy and thus suddenly he slaughtered the Jews, instructing his followers to forget praying towards Jerusalem and to start praying towards Mecca.
Muhammad taught toleration towards non-Muslims during the Medina phase, then substituted ‘something better or similar’ and during the Meccan phase started teaching ‘death to non-Muslims’. Muslim leaders (Imams) deliberately quote from the abolished Medina sections of the Qur’an claiming Muhammad preached tolerance. These Imams clearly know that the later sections of the Qur’an when Muhammad was at Mecca, the ones preaching death to non-Muslims are the better way of Islam as demanded by their prophet, Qur’an and hadith.
To comprehend why Islam is free to create unlimited warfare, havoc and death you need to understand that Surah 9 of the Qur’an is the last major chapter revealed to Muslims and it is filled with commands and exhortations to fight and kill non-Muslims. And as shown in the Qur’an and hadith the commands in Surah 9 supersede all other commands in the Qur’an.
The Muslim cry for death is due to their burning hatred of Jews, Christians and all they claim hypocritical towards Islam. This is explicit in the Qur’an. This fact is going to be fully exemplified to facilitate the charges that shall be ultimately leveled for prosecution regarding Muslim Citizenship Treason, Hate/Bias Crime and Genocide that is espoused in our nation.
Islam teaches that Muslims are to fight when they have sufficient strength to win, and that fighting (jihad) for Allah is obligatory. When not strong enough to vanquish their enemies, Islamists are told to lay low until such a time as they can. And, through jihad they are free to employ any tactic necessary to win. Thus, all Muslims are potential liars for the sake of Allah in achieving their demanded goal of ultimate global domination. Allah calls them to be liars and promises great blessings for being such.
Al-Bukhari, the compiler of the most respected canonical hadith collection, recorded that Abu Ad-Darda, a close companion and pupil of Muhammad, said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Further, Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah or taqiyyah (deception on behalf of Islam), is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.”
Leaders in the Arab world often say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic. Yasser Arafat was famous for whipping Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews right after telling Western newspapers about his desire for peace with Israel.
MUSLIMS LIE THROUGH SPEECH
There are two forms of lying to unbelievers that Muslims are to employ in order to defeat their enemies.
One is al-Taqiyya: Saying something that isn’t true if it relates to preserving the true Muslim identity and intent. By definition Taqiyya means deception; the Islamic word for concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies.
Two is Kitman: lying by omission through deliberately leaving something out. An example is when Muslims quote only a fragment of a verse such as from Al-Ma’idah 5:32 that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”. They try to insinuate that Islam does not condone murder while neglecting to state that the rest of verse 5:32 and verse 5:33 mandate murder in undefined cases of ‘corruption’ and ‘mischief.’
Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection and advances sharia.
MUSLIMS LIE THROUGH ACTIONS
Further, Muslims also practice both Tawriyah, which is intentionally creating a false impression, and Muruna, which is ‘blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others. These were practices employed by the 9/11 hijackers through going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well that the host of a popular American television show, John Walsh, claimed well after the events of 9/11 that their bar trips were evidence of ‘hypocrisy’. No, there was no hypocrisy in the 9/11 twin towers boys. They were simply following the Qur’anic directives for jihad.
An-Nahl 16:106 establishes there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie. “Whoever disbelieved in Allah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a great torment.”
The Muslim may renounce his religion, or participate in actions that deny his religion, while his heart remains secure in his faith. There is no sin on those who say or do things which are contrary to what they believe in their hearts if it achieves the goal of Islamic domination. They can lie without any guilt or fear of accountability or retribution when it is in their interest to do so and it is beneficial to the cause of Islam. For devout Muslims, the concealment of a truth in any manner, is not an abandonment of Allah’s truth in any manner, if it benefits Islam in any manner.
These people do not lie because they are simply liars by nature, they are Allah ordained systematic liars by choice. The overall principle guiding the Muslim is that one should consider the bad consequences entailed by lying to the consequences entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging to Islam, one is entitled to lie.
Canada must commence a systematic march of these Muslim liars out of the entire Nation.
It is a righteous action with God that this take place.
THREE – CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALITIES
THE DEFINITION OF HATE CRIME
Hate crime is any of a variety of crimes such as assault or defacement of property, which are motivated by hostility to the victim as a member of a group based upon their perceived color, ethnicity, religious creed, disability, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation. While it is also called bias crime, there are a wide variety of actions that may entail such emotional-mental states as hostility, animosity, antagonism, discrimination, enmity, hatred or prejudice triggering both definitions. Hatred is but one state of being that many variant emotional causes of crime are currently being lumped behind. As such, the common Legal Definition of hate crime as being: a crime that violates the victim’s civil rights and that is motivated by hostility to the victim’s race, religion, creed, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender: this actually clouds the issue. Why? Because hatred or hate is a much stronger emotional trigger than are the others listed. You cannot categorize hatred and hostility as the same thing. Thus, to categorize hate crime as hate bias crime is a borderline definition at best, but to call a hate crime a bias crime is absurdity. Take the following definitions into consideration.
Hate can be defined as “to dislike, loathe, detest, despise, abhor intensely or passionately; with feelings of extreme aversion or ill will toward the person, persons or their actions that they engender; emotion is to such degree that they desire their debasement, punishment and elimination as a source of perceived evil altogether. Now, the first problem that exists here is clearly establishing the base that the person expressing the hatred may be functioning from. We shall deal with this later, but one and all should be able to accept that premeditated murder is clearly a hate crime.
Bias is defined as actions of partiality, partisanship, favoritism, or prejudice in favor of or against one thing, or a person, or a group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair; and such actions usually results in treatment of some people unfairly. Bias normally contains unreasonable preconceived ideas, inclinations, feelings, opinions and tendencies to believe that some ideas or people are simply better than others. One can have strong bias in favor of an idea, even unreasonably hostile feelings or opinions about a social group; be prejudiced simply on the basis of racial or sexual bias, but they will never be triggered to the violence that hatred evokes.
So what we have facing us is hate crime, variant forms of anti-social bias activity and bias activity that has been defined and constituted as bias activity crime. It is bias activity crime that has wandered into the arena of violence against persons at times due to temporary emotional stimulation, whether that stimulation be due to stupidity or chemical inducements. But that stimulation is not the stimulation of hatred that underlies the actions such as that of Premeditated Murder.
Also obvious is Justin Trudeau’s Crew of Rabid Islamists continue to ensure that Blood Shall Flow In Canada as posted on February 11, 2018 And, it is his rotted bunch that must be totally eradicated from the Canadian political venue. It is a righteous action with God that this take place.
Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?