August 5, 2019 – 76 DAYS FOR ELECTION ROTTING TRUDEAU TO GO
ONE – ELECTION ROTTING TRUDEAU DESERVES INCARCERATION NOW!
ISLAMS TOP TWO SHIT-TWIT HIT PARADE
Trudeau has always been quick to grab a photo opportunity with his spiritual buddy Erdogan the President of Turkey.
Such was the case at the last G20 Summit and now this pair of Islamic Sectarian Sickos are quick to express their joint frame of mind surrounding the Saudi writer Khashoggi’s death. > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tayyip-trudeau-khashoggi-turkey-1.4880155
The hypocrites Erdogan and Trudeau agreed on the need for ‘all aspects of the murder’ to be revealed. They simply are fomenting unrest to further aggravate tensions of the Middle East and Worldwide as they seek to establish world dominion of sharia under Erdogan.
Both of these men condone murder done in the vested interests of Islam.
“In Islam there are men, in the world there are men who helped the world with their wisdom, such as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan the President of Turkey and Justin Trudeau.”
Canada cannot afford to remain Asleep at The Switch as within Mosques Islam is preaching its hatred and violence. And these men preaching such violence praise Justin Trudeau as one of their two greatest men of the modern era.
Justin Trudeau is a traitor to Canada and needs to be legally taken to account for it now. If possible, let’s see him executed, but at the very least imprisoned with no ‘good time benefits’ for the mandatory 14 years as stipulated under the Criminal Code of Canada.
This man states he is of the Muslim Brotherhood, he designates himself a terrorist, looking to establish the caliphate and that he supports the jihad warriors in any nation that they raise the flag of Islam. > 8:20 Radical Islam being preached by Shaban Sherif Mady during Friday prayers from Glengarry Hall in Edmonton, Canada-
On Feb 23, 2016 Mady spoke of restoring the “rightly-guided” Islamic Caliphate. The radical Canadian Imam Mady stated “Rome Will Be Conquered” His reference to conquering Rome mirrors a similar call by Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. “This is my advice to you. If you hold to it you will conquer Rome and own the world, if Allah wills,” Baghdadi preached in an attempt to garner more recruits to ISIS.
This Mady wants more warriors for jihad anywhere and he likens Trudeau to a King who helps Muslims. Trudeau is one of his two main political hero’s.
“Justin Trudeau – I call him today the Najashi of the current era. He hosted Muslims, honored them, visited their mosques, greeted them for their holidays, and removed the suspicion that terrorism is related to Islam, honoured the Muslims, hosted the refugees.” And, if the suspicion is removed it is easier for killers like Mady to achieve their goals.
“He is the Najashi of the current era. This is the title of my sermon that will appear on YouTube – Justin Trudeau Najashi of the current era.”
“In Islam there are men, in the world there are men who helped the world with their wisdom, such as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan the President of Turkey and Justin Trudeau.”
“Salute to Justin Trudeau, O the Najashi of the current era. This man is affable. This amiable man we call him the Najashi of the current era.”
This insane bastard incites people to violence and hatred. He should be imprisoned without trial and sent back to Egypt along with his Najashi Trudeau for his ongoing sedition and treason to Canada.
Trudeau Funds Terrorists through Cover-up Islamic Relief Programs. On last night’s episode of The Ezra Levant Show, guest-host Sheila Gunn Reid interviewed former intelligence analyst Tom Quiggin about his report detailing how the Liberals are funding terrorism by giving money to Islamic Relief Canada. Watch it > https://www.therebel.media/trudeau_liberals_fund_terrorist_linked_islamic_relief_canada?utm_campaign=rb_25_10_18&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
Trudeau Ensured His Returning Jihadi Warriors have Legal Impunity in Canada but is now facing opposition due to anger of ordinary citizens. Read about it. > 280 Canadian MPs Demand Trudeau Bring ISIS Returnees to Justice…
Tayyip is supposedly a bit jealous of his ‘promiscuous Rat PM’ given reports that > Justin Trudeau’s Two Best Friends are really Aga Khan and Ahmed Hussen.
“Justin Trudeau’s close association with Aga Khan and Ahmed Hussen speaks volumes about his plan to Islamise Canada. However, Hussen is a symbol. He is supposed to show that Muslims, and more specifically Somalis, are just like us when in fact this is not so. It’s already well known how violent and uncompromising Islam is (though even if it weren’t, we shouldn’t need to import Muslims, there is no reason to bring in masses of people so culturally different from founding peoples), but Somalis are particularly problematic. Somalis have a problem with gang violence and rape. Oh, and the women are complacent in Somali’s actual rape culture.”
There is certainly not a good Immigration solution in any format coming out of the Islamic stench of Somalia.
The Somali Stench Ahmed Hussen intends to make certain that Canada will increase annual immigration admissions to 350,000 by 2021. > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-immigration-increase-350000-1.4886546
Contact him and tell this Islamic Asshole Ahmed Hussen that you will never permit him to get away with this further invasion of our Nation.
“Canada’s border agency is stepping up efforts to deport failed refugee claimants and other foreign nationals not welcome in this country, setting a goal of dramatically increasing deportation numbers by up to 35 per cent.”
More crap from the Yap of Ralph and Crew. Police were virtually forced to turn their backs toward ‘immigrant law breakers’ that entered the country with impunity.
This blatant propaganda is designed to try to offset the backlash against all the illegal border crossers and phony asylum seekers Trudeau and Goodale made certain entered to their open arms. > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cbsa-deportations-border-removals-1.4873169
DO NOT BUY TRUDEAU ELECTION HYPE TO FURTHER ISLAM
TWO – ISLAMIC REALITIES
As was seen through the Islamic notion of hudna, Muslims do not feel themselves bound to respect any pact which they might sign with non-Muslims, and they will break such agreements as soon as they feel it is to their advantage to do so. And they are certain they will ultimately gain advantage for An-Nisa 4:141 tells them “never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way to triumphs over the believers.”
Loyalty to a non-Muslim government simply is not possible for followers of Islam. If Muslims claim they are loyal to the non-Muslim countries in which they live it is in spite of Islamic teachings and they are apostate to Islam. Unlike other faiths, Islam is not just a religion but a political system as well. Their State is to be inseparable from Islamic religious rule. Islamic law, or Sharia, is claimed complete and not designed to coexist with or be subordinate to any other legal system. So once again: Wake Up Kaffir Canada!
The Muslims you embrace are truly vultures in chicken feathers and not the birds you think have flown into your coop. For, genuine loyalty to Canada and its core values simply is not possible for adherents to the Qur’an.
Now, to sort out the chickens that should be allowed to strut around the Canadian barnyard is not an impossible task, and it truly is one that must be addressed in timely fashion by our government. In our ‘ball game’ of Canadian national security I will give you three examples why all Muslims have struck out and why they should be returned to the ‘dugouts’ they straggled in from.
One: Muslims are not to show honor or loyalty to Canada by standing for our national anthem. If unable to avoid such action they are commanded to act in a duplicitous manner as Fatwas # 85728 and others indicate. “So, it is unlawful to stand up for such a thing and Muslims should make sure that anything they do conforms with these rules. Blind imitation of disbelievers is rejected. It is reported from Abu Dawood that the Prophet said: “Whoever imitates some people, he is one of them.” So, the Muslim should not commit this Haram unless there is dire necessity like fearing to be jailed or beaten. In this case, he may make believe that he is standing for the anthem but keeps on remembering Allah and should feel deep sorrow for doing such a thing. Indeed, standing for these flags and anthems is a glorification of them. And if the person intends by such act any glorification of these things similar to glorifying Allah, then he becomes a Kafir, and moves away from Islamic religion. Allah knows best.”
It does not matter whether it is in spiritual, civil or social matters, the Qur’an is very clear that Muslims are to resist unbelievers by any means until Islam establishes political supremacy. They are not to follow the ways of the democratic society nor be tricked into doing so.
Al-Maida 5:49: “So judge between them by that which Allah hath revealed, and follow not their desires, but beware of them lest they seduce thee from some part of that which Allah hath revealed unto thee”
Muslim loyalty belongs to Allah’s Qur’an not to any government or its rituals of allegiance or obedience. A Muslim ‘citizen’ is in a position of divided loyalty if he in sincerity were to swear an oath of allegiance to our nation, or with a genuine heart to sing the National Anthem. He would in fact be accused of failing to submit to the theocracy of Allah, cast into the ranks of the hypocrites and defined as Muslim in name only. As a hypocrite and apostate, she can then be murdered.
Two: Muslims are not to obtain citizenship of a non-Muslim country, nor to make a pledge of allegiance to such country without dire necessity. Fatwas # 202420 is but one stating this, and again we see the command to act in a fraudulent manner so they can achieve their ends. “We have explained in them that in case of dire necessity, a Muslim who gives the pledge of allegiance to one of these governments may conceal his intention and use Tawriyah by saying something which has more than one meaning and intending a meaning different from what the listener is likely to understand, like to intend his allegiance only to the Muslims in those lands and to benefit that country by guiding its people to enter Islam. However, the Muslim does not become a disbeliever by merely repeating these words which contain allegiance to the people of Kufr, as long as his heart remains at rest with faith.” Khiyar al-tarwiyah literally means the option to consider, similar to the option given a buyer to rescind a contract of sale after some consideration. In our circumstance discussed the fatwas declares some means of how to enter the fraudulent agreement in safe Islamic manner.
Three: As a general rule the Muslim is forbidden to live among us because it can have many negative effects on his practice of Islam. As Fatwas # 82552 states “Living in a non-Muslim country or migration to it is permissible only if a person cannot find a Muslim country where he can earn a livelihood and can practice his religion freely. It is also permissible for Muslim scholars to live in non-Muslim countries for the purpose of Da’wah i.e., calling non-Muslims to Islam and teaching Muslims sharia rules, provided they can do so freely and would not be subjected to trials or would have to compromise or leave their religion.”
In the above are some details related to the rule of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries. But the rules for applying and accepting citizenship of those countries is much more restricted. A Muslim is not permitted to apply for citizenship of non-Muslim countries except in a dire need, such as not being able to practice his religion in his own country, in fear of or being in danger for his life, or facing the threat of imprisonment or torture in his homeland. As well, he must be unable to situate to an Islamic country where he can live. In such circumstances one can apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country. If he is obliged to take an oath for getting citizenship, at that moment of speaking he must be mentally alluding to a loyalty toward Islam in such manner as to be free of the stated allegiance to the host country.
However, if he is able to live harmlessly in the non-Muslim country without taking the citizenship oath then applying for citizenship is not permissible for him. It is also forbidden for him to apply for citizenship of a non-Muslim country if he is simply aspiring to material comforts or financial gain.
It is quite clear that the Citizenship Oath or Oath of Allegiance is something the Muslim is to try to avoid, and if participating they are to do so from a fraudulent mindset. This is why you hear the Muslim whine about the matter of not wearing the niqab in ‘legal circumstances’.
But what is the worth of an oath of any kind from someone who practices deception because his ‘religion tells him to do so when it advances his agenda? Zero! Muslims owe their alliance to the umma, the Muslim community, and not to any kafir nation. Thus, the Muslim serves the umma before our country and deceives kafirs when it advances Islam. Believing that jihad in all of its forms is the true relationship between Muslims and kafirs, why would a Muslim defend Canada from an Islamic threat or protect the Canadian Constitution? The Bill of Rights offers all peoples freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Islamic Sharia law denies these same rights to any human. The apostate of Islam can be killed without redress and freedom of speech is specifically denied as both Mohammed and the Qur’an may not be criticized. The doctrine of Islam makes a Muslim’s oath meaningless when made to kafirs, and Canada is a kaffir nation. To all in Canada: If you are not a Muslim you are a kafir.
Summation: All Muslims are clearly commanded by their faith to enter a process of ‘naturalization fraud’ when they seek Citizenship of our nation. The case is closed and it is time to start enacting appropriate sentence for this duplicity. To do so you must be familiar with the Canadian Citizenship Act:
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29, Canadian citizenship can be lost for specific reasons listed in the statute. One such reason for loss is by Order in cases of fraud: 10. (1). Subject to section 18 but notwithstanding any other section of this Act, where the Governor in Council, on a report from the Minister, is satisfied that any person has obtained, retained, renounced or resumed citizenship under this Act by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances, (a) the person ceases to be a citizen, or (b) the renunciation of citizenship by the person shall be deemed to have had no effect, as of such date as may be fixed by order of the Governor in Council with respect thereto. Presumption: (2) A person shall be deemed to have obtained citizenship by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances if the person was lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence by false representation or fraud or by knowingly concealing material circumstances and, because of that admission, the person subsequently obtained citizenship. 1974-75-76, c. 108, s. 9.
Note: Knowingly concealing of the true Islamic position with respect to ‘citizenship application and oaths’ has been proven in this Series, thus all Muslims are eligible to have their citizenship status immediately revoked. And, belief in the radical Islamic ideology itself should be grounds enough to deport immigrants, even after they have been naturalized. People are not to support totalitarian groups or affiliate with any that engage in advocating violence or ideologies that overthrow Canadian governance. The Islamic communities clearly comprise totalitarian entities for under Islam it is impossible to separate their church and state.
“All civil authority bows to the wisdom of religious clerics in their theocracy. The best existing example (if one can use that descriptor loosely) of such a theocracy in action is the Islamic Republic of Iran. The worst example in recent memory is the Taliban when it ruled Afghanistan. Can one doubt that both examples point clearly to a totalitarian form of government in which no form of peaceful dissension or religious liberty is tolerated? In fact, dissension and religious differences are dealt with brutally.”
I believe necessary legislation or ‘order in council’ needs be enacted that bans anyone from becoming a Canadian citizen if he or she is a follower of Islam. This is but a necessary first step to ensure that Islam and sharia law can never supersede secular law and liberty in Canada. Further, the process must be started now of stripping all citizenship rights from Muslims for their failure to disclose their beliefs and true intents in the initial circumstance. As shown in the fatwas all practicing Muslims have been involved in naturalization fraud and their citizenship should be immediately rescinded or the laws of Canada continue onward as a bad joke. Immigration laws allowing Muslims into Canada should be immediately repealed for the protection of the Canadian public.
Denaturalized people usually revert to their prior immigration status, which is often as a permanent resident alien. Simply reverting to prior status is not sufficient for Muslims, for it still allows the perpetrators of deception and terrorism to wander our society at will. All resident aliens convicted of certain crimes, particularly national security crimes should be subject to immediate deportation.
But, even in the absence of a criminal conviction, permanent residents can be deported if they obtained that status through fraud or misrepresentation. It would seem quite clear that our Muslim miscreants should stand for deportation due to their fraudulent conduct. This cannot be a case by case, drawn out process but one of immediate enactment if those adhering to the Islamic faith do not renounce the commandments of the Qur’an that demands their pursuit of sharia law and the hate crimes perpetuated through their beliefs.
It does not matter what generation of Muslims you are dealing with for they have all lied during the naturalization process. As a group, they should be forced to, either, vocally renounce their belief in the practice of undemocratic Islamic law or have their citizenship immediately revoked. This would not infringe on their civil liberties or human rights as they have no Canadian entitlement to such given their initial fraudulent actions and faith-based convictions. As to taking such an oath of renunciation, it is probably best used along with some format of a polygraph process. In all this one has to remember they are dealing with ‘faith justified liars’, thus a blanket expulsion of all followers of Islam remains the most expedient for cleansing the Nation of their evil. The case against them is already 100% confirmed through their documented beliefs in Qu’ran and hadith.
It is a righteous action with God that this take place.
THREE – CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALITIES
PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION?
Over the past few years in dealing with the evil of Islam and unrepentant homosexuality I have sent thousands of messages to individuals, groups, associations, organizations and institutions. I have also walked the same message into locations like the Vatican and remote jungle villages of Indonesia. In it all I have sought the leading of the Holy Spirit. None of what I have done can be qualified as hate speech or hate propaganda. If you think it can be than level charges and let us get into the Supreme Court of Canada where I can see to the complete elimination of Islam in this nation and termination of the homosexual agenda that continues to destroy the families of all heterosexual individuals.
Now, physical actions with specific visible results appear to be easier to judge and apply legal parameters to than do verbal actions that may be the trigger of such physical actions. This circumstance has us facing the two general areas of hate/bias crime verbalization: (1) Hate Propaganda and (2) Hate Speech.
But a simply fact remains that verbalizations whether they be mental only within the individuals head or vocally uttered from their lips always precede physical actions. When we enter the realm of verbalization and hate/bias crime we are naturally transferred into all arenas of media communication from paper to internet. What is spoken has great import, but what is published has a far greater impact for its record is intact and lasting. This has long been recognized by the Canadian Legal System, but its ability to deal with the issues involved has been fragmented from coast to coast.
The Criminal Code of Canada is our attempt to apply a blanket law from coast to coast. An example of this in the generalized area of hate/bias crime verbalization can be seen in Uttering Threats: Section 264.1(1) where it makes it an offense to knowingly threaten (directly or indirectly) death or bodily harm. The maximum penalty is five years. The same section makes it an offense to burn, destroy or damage property or to kill or injure an animal that is the property of another person. (For your resource reference the Main Menu: Criminal Code of Canada ) But, what is visibly evidenced are differences between the Provinces and Territories as to their abilities to enact and enforce hate/bias crime laws that are supposed to be uniform. Different provincial/territorial bodies are employing variant legal tools to try to achieve what is supposed to be a commonality of purpose in applying hate/bias crime laws equally to all citizens of Canada.
Saskatchewan had the first legislation in North America (1947) to prohibit victimisation on account of race, religion, colour, sex, nationality, ancestry, and place of origin. And it is from recent events of Saskatchewan I will ultimately focus upon that rectification of our current Canadian Legal mess shall truly commence. It shall commence or this Nation will rapidly dissolve in the foment of social-political-economic-spiritual unrest now evidenced. And, at the forefront of necessary concerns evidenced from Saskatchewan are the issues of (1) Hate Propaganda and (2) Hate Speech.
Once again from our Toronto Police Boys: “The internet and its various modes of communication remain a popular method for communicating hate propaganda, threats and criminal harassment, most likely due to the perpetrator’s perceived ability to remain anonymous. Perpetrators are frequently able to remain anonymous by creating false personas and email addresses when communicating to their victims over the internet.
In 2015, five hate/bias occurrences were committed via the internet, representing approximately 4% of the total hate/bias motivated occurrences. Based on the continuously increasing prevalence of the internet as a medium of communication, the HCU continues to closely monitor open forum websites, chat rooms, message boards, etc. and initiate investigations as required. When possible criminality is identified, the HCU draws on other Service resources, including support from the Computer Cyber Crime and the Technological Crime Sections of Intelligence Services.”
Hate propaganda is defined as, “Any communication that advocates or promotes genocide or makes statements, other than in private, that promote hatred against an identifiable group”. An identifiable group is defined by the Criminal Code as, “Any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation”. The consent of the Ontario Attorney General is required for hate propaganda prosecutions.
Take particular note: Neither section 318 or 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code specifically addresses hate on the Internet, but they both have been used to stop Canadians from posting what some special interest groups consider hate propaganda. This has been done through back doors such as the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals. However, no proceeding under s. 318 or s. 319(2) of the Code can take place without the consent of the Attorney General of the province where the offence took place and such consent often proves to be very difficult to obtain. Why? Because it must be proven that the accused intentionally acted out of hatred. As well, the accused can easily defend themselves through the defence of good faith expression of opinion on a religious subject or spiritual belief when based firmly on religious text.
However, under s. 320.1 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which came about due to the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001, a judge can now order hate propaganda removed from the Internet even where the intent to advocate genocide or the wilful promotion of hatred cannot be proven and regardless of whether the content provider is also prosecuted under ss. 318 / 319 or not. In other words, a judge can use the law to push forward their own particular bias and this occurrence has increased with alarming frequency in the past decade. So, pay particular heed to the Canadian Criminal Code 320. Warrant of Seizure published intact.
- WARRANT OF SEIZURE … / Summons to occupier / Owner and author may appear / Order of forfeiture / Disposal of matter/ Appeal / Consent / Definitions / “court” / “genocide” / “hate propaganda” / “judge”..
- (1)A judge who is satisfied by information on oath that there are reasonable grounds for believing that any publication, copies of which are kept for sale or distribution in premises, within the jurisdiction of the court, is hate propaganda, shall issue a warrant under his hand authorizing seizure of the copies.
(2) Within seven days of the issue of the warrant under subsection (1), the judge shall issue a summons to the occupier of the premises requiring him to appear before the court and show cause why the matter seized should not be forfeited to Her Majesty.
(3) The owner and the author of the matter seized under subsection (1) and alleged to be hate propaganda may appear and be represented in the proceedings in order to oppose the making of an order for the forfeiture of the matter.
(4) If the court is satisfied that the publication referred to in subsection (1) is hate propaganda, it shall make an order declaring the matter forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province in which the proceedings take place, for disposal as the Attorney General may direct.
(5) If the court is not satisfied that the publication referred to in subsection (1) is hate propaganda, it shall order that the matter be restored to the person from whom it was seized forthwith after the time for final appeal has expired.
(6) An appeal lies from an order made . under subsection (4) or (5) by any person who appeared in the proceedings
(a) on any ground of appeal that involves a question of law alone,
(b) on any ground of appeal that involves a question of fact alone, or
(c) on any ground of appeal that involves a question of mixed law and fact,
as if it were an appeal against conviction or against a judgement or verdict of acquittal, as the case may be, on a question of law alone under Part XXI , and sections 673 to 696 apply with such modifications as the circumstances require.
(7) No proceeding under this section shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.
(8) In this section,
(a) in the Province of Quebec, the Court of Quebec,
(a.1) in the Province of Ontario, the Ontario Court (General Division),
(b) in the Provinces of New Brunswick, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, the Court of Queen’s Bench,
(c) in the Provinces of Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland, the Supreme Court, Trial Division, and
(c.1) [Repealed. 1992, c.51, s.36.]
(d) in the Provinces of Nova Scotia and British Columbia, the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories, the Supreme Court;
NOTE: Definition “court” amended 1993, c.28, s.78 (to come into force April 1, 1999) by re-enacting para. (d). the text of para. (d), which is not yet in force and therefor printed in italics, reads as follows:
(d) in the Provinces of Nova Scotia and British Columbia, the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut, the Supreme Court;
has the same meaning as in section 318 ;
means any writing, sign or visible representation that advocates or promotes genocide or the communication of which by any person would constitute an offence under section 319 ;
means a judge of a court. [r.S., c.11 (1st Supp.), s.1; 1974-75, c.48, s.25; 1978-79, c.11, s.10; R.S.C. 1985, c.27 (2nd Supp.), s.10; c.40 (4th Supp.), s.2; 1990, c.16, s.4; 1990, c.17, s.11; 1992, c.1, s.58.]
A MIX of DEFINITIONS with ETHNIC and TECHNICAL LANGUAGE BASES can further compound the issues surrounding EQUAL application of Canadian Law from Coast to Coast. This has shown itself in the appointment of the new Governor General of Canada with the baggage of her personal prejudices and nuances attached.
Julie Payette with her ‘scientific wisdom’ has all the foolishness of her buddy Justin Trudeau emanating from the common beaker of their brains. These are truly Godless spiritually odious people and thus a reminder of 1 Timothy 6:20-21: “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: which some professing have erred concerning the faith.”
The profane and vain babblings of this pair are further defining the DESTRUCTION of THE NATION OF CANADA through their Islamic and gender bent lunacy. It is thus Justin Trudeau’s Crew continues to ensure that Blood Shall Flow In Canada as posted on February 11, 2018 And, it is all Trudeau’s rotted political appointments that should be totally rescinded with such societal vermin crawling back under the rocks from whence they came.
It is a righteous action with God that this take place.
Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?