DAY 67

 

67 DAYS

August 14, 2019 – 67 DAYS TO PERMANENTLY STOP BABY-T’s PROGRAM OF TRANS-FAMILY GENERATION

Trudeau is so stupid that he thinks Canadians will buy into the belief that you can transition a Muslim into a legally recognizable and emotionally stable member of a non-Islamic society.

Trans-Family Generation of the Muslim crew to be a normal member of the Canadian family has as much reality as Transiting a brood of blackened vipers into a flock of snow-white doves.

ONE – NO MUSLIM CAN BE GENUINELY HUMILIATED BY HAVING THEIR CITIZENSHIP QUESTIONED

No Muslim is legally a Canadian Citizen!

fadwa-alaouiNOT A CANADIAN

Canadian woman turned away from U.S. border after asked questions about religion and President Donald Trump.

“I felt humiliated, treated as if I was less than nothing. It’s as if I wasn’t Canadian,” Alaoui told CBC News in an interview Wednesday.

‘We found videos on your phone that are against us,’ Fadwa Alaoui says she was told by a border agent

According to the agency, an average of 1.2 million people a day try to enter the U.S. at all crossings. Of those, an average of between 300 and 500 are denied entry for various reasons.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/canadian-woman-turned-away-from-u-s-border-after-questions-about-religion-trump-1.3972019

It was a wise decision not to permit Fadwa Alaoui entry to the United States. She is not legally a Canadian. She is a Liar and as all Muslims claiming to be Canadian 100% guilty of Citizenship Fraud.

They all will soon be coming under blanket prosecution through our Criminal Justice system and face expulsion from our nation.

Like all Muslims Fadwa Alaoui is a sanctified Liar Through Speech

There are two forms of lying to unbelievers that Muslims are to employ in order to defeat their enemies. One is al-Taqiyya: Saying something that isn’t true if it relates to preserving the true Muslim identity and intent. By definition Taqiyya means deception; the Islamic word for concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies.

Two is Kitman: lying by omission through deliberately leaving something out. An example is when Muslims quote only a fragment of a verse such as from Al-Ma’idah 5:32 that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind”. They try to insinuate that Islam does not condone murder while neglecting to state that the rest of verse 5:32 and verse 5:33 mandate murder in undefined cases of ‘corruption’ and ‘mischief.’

Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection and advances sharia.

Like all Muslims Fadwa Alaoui is a sanctified Liar Through Actions

Further, Muslims also practice both Tawriyah, which is intentionally creating a false impression, and Muruna, which is ‘blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others. These were practices employed by the 9/11 hijackers through going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well that the host of a popular American television show, John Walsh, claimed well after the events of 9/11 that their bar trips were evidence of ‘hypocrisy’. No, there was no hypocrisy in the 9/11 twin towers boys. They were simply following the Qur’anic directives for jihad.

An-Nahl 16:106 establishes there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.  “Whoever disbelieved in Allah after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a great torment.” The Muslim may renounce his religion, or participate in actions that deny his religion, while his heart remains secure in his faith. There is no sin on those who say or do things which are contrary to what they believe in their hearts if it achieves the goal of Islamic domination. They can lie without any guilt or fear of accountability or retribution when it is in their interest to do so and it is beneficial to the cause of Islam. For devout Muslims, the concealment of a truth in any manner, is not an abandonment of Allah’s truth in any manner, if it benefits Islam in any manner.

These people do not lie because they are simply liars by nature, they are Allah ordained systematic liars by choice. The overall principle guiding the Muslim is that one should consider the bad consequences entailed by lying to the consequences entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging to Islam, one is entitled to lie.

There are many circumstances when a Muslim may be compelled to deceive others for the greater purpose of ensconcing sharia. And the Quran and hadith state this unequivocally.

Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman to have sex and (4) to facilitate one on his journey of advancing Islam.

I will provide you a few examples and you can examine an in-depth outline of all pertinent scripture and hadith showing Taqiyya (lying, deceiving, illusion) is Islam’s most important ideological …  war tool. This is a fairly massive resource base surrounding taqiyya in all its aspects. So first watch the next video link.

It will probably help you to accept the truth through listening to an Arabic speaking former Muslim carefully explain to you Ale-Imran 3:28, and just why a Muslim can lie to you with impunity.

{ لاَّ يَتَّخِذِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ ٱلْكَافِرِينَ أَوْلِيَآءَ مِن دُونِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَمَن يَفْعَلْ ذٰلِكَ فَلَيْسَ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ فِي شَيْءٍ إِلاَّ أَن تَتَّقُواْ مِنْهُمْ تُقَـٰةً وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ ٱللَّهُ نَفْسَهُ وَإِلَىٰ ٱللَّهِ ٱلْمَصِيرُ }

 “(Let not the believers take) the believers ought not to take [the hypocrites:] ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy and his companions [and] (disbelievers) the Jews (for their friends) so as to become mighty and honourable (in preference to believers) who are sincere. (Whoso doeth that) seeking might and honour [by taking the hypocrites and disbelievers as friends] (hath no connection with Allah) has no honour, mercy or protection from Allah (unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them) save yourselves from them, (taking (as it were) security) saving yourselves from them by speaking in a friendly way towards them with, while your hearts dislikes this. (Allah bideth you beware (only) of Himself) regarding the shunning of unlawful killing, unlawful sex, unlawful property, consuming intoxicants, false testimony and associating partners with Allah. (Unto Allah is the journeying) the return after death.” Ale-Imran 3:28       https://youtu.be/xHzFkky1qZI

Employing deceit is no problem to the Islamic mind. As just witnessed we see Allah telling Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to ‘guard themselves’ against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not, and truly do not feel that way.       U.S. Islamist Group: Fake Friendship with Non-Believers

The heart’s intent.

Found amid the instructions surrounding marriage are instructions explaining why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good. The context of these verses is clear in that Allah calls you to account only for the intention in your hearts.

Al-Baqarah 2:225: “Allah does not impose blame upon you for what is unintentional in your oaths, but He imposes blame upon you for what your hearts have earned. And Allah is Forgiving and Forbearing.”

An-Nahl 16:106: “Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced to renounce his religion while his heart is secure in faith. But those who willingly open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah, and for them is a great punishment;”

Makara

From Lane’s Lexicon, the most revered and scholarly English dictionary of the Arabic language, we find our definition of makara. Makara literally means deception, deceit: to practice deceit or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to exercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice stratagem.

So, prepare to bow down to Allah as the King of Makara, for Allah is the chief of deceivers and schemers.  In the following Qur’an verses, Allah reveals to us that he is the ‘best deceiver and schemer’.

Ali ‘Imran 3:54 “And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers (makir*).” Literal translation.

Al-Anfal 8:30 “And when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you, or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive, and God deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers (makir*). Literal translation.

*This word makir (schemer) is a very strong disparaging word and Abdel-Nour defines such persons as “sly, dishonest, cunning, wily, deceivers who set out to cheat you by deception. Such is the nature of Allah and his devout adherents.”

So I ask: humiliation for what reason Fadwa? Obviously being a liar doesn’t humiliate you.

Well, neither Allah nor his devout adherents will be able to deceive their way out of the Justice they will be facing through our Canadian Legal System in 2017.

Phinehas

 

TWOISLAMIC REALITIES – TRY HUMILIATING OUR MUSLIM MADMAN OF THE MONTH

London: 

Certainly > 7:40 radical Islam lunacy is being preached in London, Ontario  by Mazin Abdul Adhim an immigrant from Iraq.

Mazin Abdul-Adhim is leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Canada and as Mackenzie Institute herein documents he is “Providing the Mood Music to Which the Suicide Bombers Dance”.

Of the creatures I have looked at I believe that he displays the highest degree of intelligence in the manner he puts forth the ideology of Islam. However, he is also the most adept at manipulation of the Islamic view of reality, serving to entrap the novice into the hell coming upon earth through what he genuinely believes. Born and raised in Canada he has truly grasped the best ways to attack our nation is through the societal mental cracks of ‘one size fits all embracing of multi-culturalism and desire for fairness’ that is at he heart of Canadian desire for justice. Thus, through ‘Hizb ut-Tahrir’ he ideologically projects himself to be the ‘purest of the pure’ amid those representing Islam.

And this leader of “what may be Canada’s fastest growing Islamist group believes that all Canadian soldiers are war criminals.1  The perceived leader of the Canadian arm of the group says publicly that Muslims should not vote in elections unless they are voting for Sharia Law.  Hizb ut-Tahrir is able to grow as it has a fluid organizational system and receives considerable practical support from government officials such as the Mayor of Mississauga and the City of Hamilton.

The Canadian public frequently questions why Canada has produced a growing stream of suicide bombers, martyrs, ISIS propagandists and a string of jihadist fighters for a variety of Islamist causes.  One reason, and perhaps the primary one, is that Canada has a series of Islamist extremist groups that create the necessary social, political and cultural space for an extremist ideology to blossom into political violence; that is to say terrorism.”

“The leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir in the USA, Dr. Mohammed Malkawi, made his views on the role of Hizb ut-Tahrir clear at a conference in Jordan: “Let Britain, America, and the entire West go to hell, because the Caliphate is coming, Allah willing.”12

The leader of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Canada appears to be Mazin Abdul-Adhim, a Canadian citizen of Iraqi descent living in London, Ontario, a hotbed of Islamist views.  He was originally recruited by Maajid Nawaz (now at the Quilliam Foundation) into Hizb ut-Tahrir while they were both in London, UK.  As the perceived leading ‘Imam’ of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Canada, it was Abdul-Adhim who openly stated, “No Muslim should honour the memory of those war criminals by wearing a poppy, just as no one would honour a criminal that killed his or her mother and father.”13

Read the documentation and then listen to Mazin speak about > 55:44   The Group, The Method, and The Progress So Far of the political system organized as Hizb ut Tahrir in 1953.

After watching this ask yourself two things: 1) “Just how many grains of rotted Islamic rice has Hizb ut-Tahir spread throughout the Canadian social, cultural and political system?” The answer is obvious in the state of decay is it not? 2) “How long do we allow our Government to fund and permit the agents of sedition and treason to speak freely against the overthrow of the Canadian democratic system?” The answer is obvious: we bring it to a grinding halt now.

 Read jewishinfo-News details of why it must be ground to a halt now

“Terrorist war is part of a total war, which sees the whole of society as the enemy and all the members of a society as appropriate objects for violent actions. It is absolute war because its goal is absolute destruction of society and it accepts annihilation of persons as an appropriate means. Terrorists are the shock troops in a war to the death against the values and institutions of a society, a Western society, and of the people who embody it.” – Jeane Kirkpatrick, Former United States Ambassador to The United Nations  

Read more about Hzib ut-Tahrir and Mazin madness telling Muslims Not to Apologize for the ISIS Suicide Attack by Aaron Driver on August 10 ,2016.  “Even if the information is true, we must not allow these sorts of events to cause us to be pressured to apologize for actions that we are not responsible for, nor should this cause us to become afraid of speaking the truth. The governments of the West kill and help kill dozens of innocent civilians every day, and the crimes they have committed against humanity through their foreign policies are orders of magnitude worse than anything these individuals have committed or tried to commit.”

Now, as spoken by Robert Spencer:  “This Toronto Sun story dates from January, and the video from November; we don’t usually post archival material, but this is important enough to make an exception. Mazin Abdul-Adhim says: “The problem is that we don’t understand our own system — the Khilafa (caliphate). And therefore, how do we support the people of Syria? We must send money and help the refugees that are coming here in every way that we can.” The Toronto Sun reports: “Helping Syrian refugees coming to Canada and building an Islamic caliphate are part of the same cause, according to a pro-Shariah speaker at an Islamic conference in Hamilton.” Read the article  Muslim speaker in Canada calls for “full implementation of Islam” stating Syrian migrant influx helps build the caliphate. Watch the video > 37:48 The Truth Behind the Syrian Refugee Crisis  https://youtu.be/rGRkOhDaOFY

This man is intelligent, an excellent speaker and advocate for Islam. But, Mazin Abdul Adhim also claims the Islam encourages rational thinking. Well, it is not too rational for him to be openly promoting hatred and genocide of the Jews at any time. And he was not too rational as posted on: 11/25/2016 that Mazin Abdul-Adhimexpressed joy over the fires that have broken out throughout Israel over the last few days and prayed that Allah would burn all of Israel. He posted on Facebook:  “Aside from the interesting coincidence that all these fires spread wildly due to ‘unusually strong winds’ just as they are trying to ban the Athan [call to prayer] across the lands they occupy, what’s even more interesting is how this event further exposes their severe weakness and near-total dependency on foreign help, as they beg for foreign assistance and aid to save them.”

The End All –

“Hizb ut-Tahrir, like many other Islamist groups, can be considered an extremist group as it openly advocates policies that run directly contrary to the Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  It is openly anti-democratic, anti-feminist and pro-Sharia.  Yet Canadian politicians regularly find a way to submit themselves to the will of such groups.  It is unclear if the politicians involved are incredibility naive, simple minded or perhaps knowledgeable, but find it easier to go along with them and not rock the boat based on the mythical belief in “community balance.”  Whatever the case, Islamist groups continue to grow in Canada while the lessons of the UK, France and Belgium remain lost on the majority of Canadians and their political class.

Meanwhile, the mood music for the suicide bombers and other extremists continues to play. Responsibility and accountability appear to still lie in the future.”

It is not too rational for Canadian politicians to think that the people who elected them will any longer permit them to acquiesce to Islamic extremists or their methods as being employed through e-411 and m-103. If they vote the motion in this week ad establish our potential Goodale Style Committee there shall be results for them far beyond the legal measures that, God willing, I presently look toward instituting. Establishing the potential committee will only increase the evidence, the number of charges and perhaps slightly alter some of the jurisdictional ball parks to bat the lot of the sharia exponents through. Not to employ the legal measures for certainly will result in further unleashing of the elements looking to ensure anarchy and all its potential blood flow occasioned along such path. Laws are made for the lawless, but they have to be enforced to stop all such persons from destroying the Canadian way of living free from coast to coast.

As to the high intelligence and low in wisdom subhuman Mazin Abdul-Adhim? He incites people to sedition, treason, violence, hatred and genocide. He should be imprisoned without trial, all citizenships of the family that raised him revoked and the rotted lot sent back to Iraq.

 

Phinehas

 

 

THREECONSTITUTIONAL LEGALITIES

THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION (The Commission)

Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, The Commission protects the human rights of all individuals lawfully present in Canada. It promotes a vision for Canada where all individuals have equal opportunity and are able to live their lives free from discrimination.

The Commission is responsible for dealing with allegations of discrimination. By law, it is bound to screen every discrimination complaint it receives. When possible, The Commission encourages people to try to solve their disputes informally. In the event people are unable to solve the matter themselves, The Commission may conduct an investigation. If it believes the complaint has merit, The Commission can send it to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal for further examination. Otherwise, the complaint is dismissed.

In some instances, The Commission can also appear before the Tribunal. This occurs when The Commission feels that the complaint deals with a matter of public interest. This includes decisions that have the potential to clarify, influence, shape or define human rights law in Canada.

The Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) is a statute passed by the Parliament of Canada in 1977 with the express goal of extending the law to ensure equal opportunity to individuals who may be victims of discriminatory practices based on a set of prohibited grounds such as sex, sexual orientation, race, marital status, creed, age, colour, disability, political or religious belief. But, it is also stated that while the Canadian Human Rights Act applies throughout Canada, that it is fully applicable only to federally regulated activities; each province and territory thus has its own anti-discrimination law that applies to activities that are not federally regulated.  Thus, we have a hodgepodge of jurisdictional matters and unequally applied laws due to unequal definition contexts from coast to coast; and the CHRC has been justifiably criticized over its investigations of alleged hate speech as well as its procedures regarding admissibility of evidence. Such criticism is probably even more warranted when you look at the activities of the Provincial-Territorial Human Rights Commissions established.

On May 17, 2016, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (Bill C-16) was introduced to the Canadian House of Commons, to add and include “gender identity or expression” to the legislation, by the Liberal Government of PM Justin Trudeau. If enacted the bill will add “gender identity or expression” as a prohibited ground of discrimination. That would make it illegal to deny services, employment, accommodation and similar benefits to individuals based on their gender identity or expression. An individual who denies benefits based on the gender identity or expression could be civilly liable for monetary damages to the individual denied benefits. This prohibition supposedly would only apply to matters falling within federal jurisdiction.

The bill also proposes to amend the Criminal Code by adding “gender identity or expression” to the definition of “identifiable group” in section 318.  That amendment would make it a criminal offence to spread hate propaganda based on gender identity or expression, contrary to section 318, and would also make it a criminal offence to advocate genocide based on gender identity or expression, contrary to section 319 of the Code.

The bill also proposes to add “gender identity or expression” to section 718.2 of the Code. This section is part of the sentencing provisions and would make it an aggravating factor to commit a criminal offence motivated by the gender identity or expression of the victim.

These criminal prohibitions would apply across Canada.

THE PROCESS OF ENACTING FEDERAL BILLS

A bill must pass the legislative process in the House of Commons, then the Senate, and finally receive Royal Assent before it will become law.  In Canada, the Governor-General may give assent either in person at a ceremony held in the Senate or by a written declaration notifying parliament of his or her agreement to the bill. If the Governor General of Canada is unable to give assent, it can be done by either the Deputy of the Governor General, or the Chief Justice of Canada—or another justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. It is not actually necessary for the governor general to sign a bill passed by a legislature, the signature being merely an attestation. In each case, the parliament must be apprised of the granting of assent before the bill is considered to have become law. Two methods are available: the sovereign’s representatives may grant assent in the presence of both houses of parliament; alternatively, each house may be notified separately, usually by the speaker of that house. However, though both houses must be notified on the same day, notice to the House of Commons while it is not in session may be given by way of publishing a special issue of the Journals of the House of Commons, whereas the Senate must be sitting and the governor general’s letter read aloud by the speaker.

Final approval of the Federal Bills in Canada is assent through the lieutenant governors of the provinces and their offices can become a “pass the buck process of delay due to political designs of incumbents”.  A lieutenant governor may defer assent to the governor general, and the governor general may defer assent to federal bills to the sovereign authority over the province. The lieutenant governors are plain and simply a process of patronage and attempted political manipulations. While required by the tenets of constitutional monarchy to be nonpartisan during their time in office, lieutenant governors have frequently been former politicians and some have returned to politics following their vice regal service. Canadian lieutenant governorships have also been used to promote women and minorities into a prominent position.

In Canada, a lieutenant governor is the vice regal representative in a provincial jurisdiction of the Canadian monarch and head of stateQueen Elizabeth II, who resides predominantly in her oldest realm, the United Kingdom. On the advice of his or her prime minister, the Governor General of Canada appoints the lieutenant governors to carry out most of the monarch’s constitutional and ceremonial duties for an unfixed period of time known as serving at His Excellency’s pleasure—though five years is the normal convention. Similar positions in Canada’s three territories are termed Commissioners and are representatives of the federal government, however, not the monarch directly.

These appointments are usually done in consultation with the relevant premier of a province or territorial head.   In 2012, the Advisory Committee on Vice-Regal Appointments was established to create a non-binding shortlist of candidates to be presented to the prime minister when the appointment of a lieutenant governor is upcoming.

Incumbents are constitutionally mandated to serve for at least five years, unless the federal parliament agrees to remove the individual from office. Also, the prime minister may recommend to the governor general that the viceroy remain in the Crown’s service for a longer period of time, sometimes upwards of more than ten years. And, in some provinces, the associated chief justice has a standing appointment as the provincial administrator. Besides the administration of the oaths of office, there is no set formula for the swearing-in of a lieutenant governor-designate.

To sum up:  “a lieutenant governors’ primary task is to perform the sovereign’s constitutional duties on his or her behalf, acting within the principles of parliamentary democracy and responsible government as a guarantor of continuous and stable governance, and as a nonpartisan safeguard against the abuse of power. The office is the core of authority in a province.

For the most part, however, the powers of the Crown are exercised on a day-to-day basis by elected and appointed individuals, leaving the lieutenant governors to perform the various ceremonial duties the sovereign.”

The system truly does not function as a non-partisan safeguard against the abuse of power, and to say it does is hypocritical.

 THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

But, it is through the Canadian Human Rights Commission which administers the Canadian Human Rights Act that much of our legal morass has evolved and not just the judicial bodies we call our Courts of Justice.  The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) was established in 1977 by the government of Canada. As stated in the foregoing, it is empowered under the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) to investigate and try to settle complaints of discrimination in employment and in the provision of services within federal jurisdiction.

The Employment Equity Act of 1995    Employment equity (Canada)

The CHRC is also empowered under the Employment Equity Act to ensure that federally regulated employers provide equal opportunities for four designated groups: women, Aboriginal people, the disabled and visible minorities. The CHRC helps enforce these human rights and inform the general public and employers of these rights. The Act states that “employment equity means more than treating persons the same way but also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences.”

Barriers to employment are to be removed for the four designated groups and the term reasonable accommodation is often used for the removal of such barriers to employment. Examples of employment barriers are wheelchair inaccessible buildings, or practices that make members of a designated group uncomfortable, such as holding management meetings in strip clubs. Employers are also required to institute positive policies for the hiring, training, retention, and promotion of members of the designated groups.

The Employment Equity Act is federal legislation, and as such, applies only to a narrow group of industries that are federally regulated under the Canadian constitution. Overall, federal employment equity legislation covers only 6% of the Canadian workforce, thus the scope of the Employment Equity Act is quite limited, and the vast majority of employers, including nearly all retailers and manufacturing companies, fall outside its jurisdiction.

The Canadian federal government also administers the Federal Contractors’ Program (FCP). This is not part of the Employment Equity Act, but rather is a non-legislated program that extends employment equity to organizations beyond the scope of the Act.  The FCP states that suppliers of goods and services to the federal government (with some specified exceptions) must have an employment equity program in place. This is basically a federal government form of coercion; if the contractors desire the funds available through federal contracts they must have the equity program with all its rules in place.

Some provinces also use the term employment equity in conjunction with their enforcement of provincial-level human rights legislation. However, while every province has human rights legislation to prohibit discrimination against women and various minorities, no province has a law that is an analogue to the federal Employment Equity Act.

Oversight of employment equity is shared among three federal government agencies, of which the Canadian Human Rights Commission is but one. The CHRC deals with both private and public-sector employers that are federally regulated, and it is also responsible for conducting audits of employers’ compliance.

However, Employment Equity is surrounded with controversy and has in some areas further muddied the waters of what best designates hate/bias crimes.  But, in ways it is distinct from other propounded human rights concepts.

The Canadian Human Rights Act has long prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity, and certain other grounds.  But the key distinction between the two laws is that the Canadian Human Rights Act merely prohibits discrimination, whereas the Employment Equity Act requires employers to engage in proactive measures to improve the employment opportunities of the four specific groups listed above. Note that the Canadian Human Rights Act protects a wider range of minorities, such as sexual and religious minorities, while the Employment Equity Act limits its coverage to the aforementioned four protected groups. In Canada, employment equity is a specific legal concept, and should not be used as a synonym for non-discrimination or workplace diversity. Neither should employment equity be confused with pay equity, which is an entirely distinct concept. Pay equity, as a Canadian legal term, refers to the legal requirement that predominantly female occupations be paid the same as predominantly male occupations of equal importance within a given organization.

Once again Trudeau into the Trenches with his Woe Begotten Wenches. She could not perform satisfactorily within the Liberal Ministerial ranks. This naturally qualified her to become the first female Provincial lieutenant-governor. What did Newfoundland and Labrador do to have this foisted upon them?

And, what more can Trudeau do to ensure that Blood Shall Flow In Canada as posted on February 11, 2018   Trudeau and his stooge appointments must be terminated.

 It is a righteous action with God that this take place.

Phinehas

Galatians 4:16    Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.